Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Few Comments On The 753s  
User currently offlineI LOVE EWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 852 posts, RR: 8
Posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

I normally would not post a report of a specific aricraft type, however I had the opportunity to fly a CO 753 yesterday. Since it is a relatively new aircraft type I want to comment on the plane.

A) It was a very, very, very long plane. The Lavortories are conviently located at 4 points thoughout the aircraft. On such a long plane this is a very convient feature.

B) I really appreciate the comfort of the plane. I am 6'5 290 pounds and I found a coach seat by the window very comfortable. I think the pitch may be 32 inches but it seemed like more than that.

C) We were a medium to heavy load and the plane had not trouble climbing to FL 35 in a matter of minutes. For that matter the plane used very little of the runway on takeoff.

All in all a very good airplane. I wish other carriers would look into buying it. I think it would fit into DL, AA and UAL routes and network well. It would be a very nice plane to fly TRANSATL. and to Hawaii (like ATA does). If you can try to get on one do it!!!


13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirplanetire From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1809 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

I really think that it is a good plane as well. I have never had the pleasure of flying it, but it does sound good, from a technical viewpoint and from a passenger's view point. Airlines must think it just does not fit into their fleet plan. It seems like a great plane though for lots of passengers but not a lot of cargo. Maybe it would be good for European charter airlines. I don't really know a lot about how they do cargo though, so maybe not. Not to get this thread off on a tangent, but I think that the 739 and 717 also fit into the category of good airplanes but that don't fit into fleet plans. I have had the pleasure of flying on a 739 (also of CO) and it was comfortable. It was nothing special, but it certainly was not bad. Still good I thought.

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1447 times:

The seat/mile cost of the 753 is the lowest of any aircraft. No doubt AA/UA/DL will have their eye on it when they return to profitability as a 762 replacement or 752 capacity jump.


Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineFly_ATA From United States of America, joined May 2001, 616 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

From what I have seen and heard ATA is very pleased with the aircraft. I get to work with the plane every night and the big knock on it was the time it took to enplane /deplane. I have yet to see any problems or delays related to that though.



User currently offlineTriley1057 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 1999, 461 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1343 times:

I too had the pleasure of flying a CO 753 from IAH to LAX. I couldn't get over how long the plane was. Of course, I was in one of the very last rows so it took forever to get off at LAX. I was really impressed by the plane itself though. I Love EWR, what route did you fly?

User currently offlineI LOVE EWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 852 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1301 times:

Triley1057, I am fortunate and play football for the university I attend. The route I flew was TYS-EWR on the charter after our game.

User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1253 times:

I've flown on ATA's 753s to PHX a couple of times this summer and I've been very pleased. Excellent flight attendants and decent IFE (I wish we had something like UA's channel 9) on a brand spankin' new plane with a new terminal in MDW...what more could you want? Keep your eyes open on Monday...more is coming!

joe


User currently onlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16820 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

Go Rutgers!

Go Monmouth Hawks Big grin



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5726 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

Correction- the 757-300 has the lowest seat mile cost of any NARROWBODY aircraft available. The widebodies- like the 777- will easily have a lower seat mile cost due to their terriffic efficiency and larger number of passengers.

This does not detract from the thrill of the 753 as being really cheap to operate.

HOWEVER- if you can't fill a Super 80 (AA), then why do you need a 753?

Randy


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 10 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1173 times:

Got reminded why I love the SevenFive tonight. Driving on I-95 the skyline of West Palm Beach in front of me....and a CO 757 (think it was a -200, though they do bring the -300 in here now and then) was barely three or four miles from where it left the concrete at PBI....and already halfway to Mars.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Well.... you know what I mean...

"...If it Looks Good.....It flies Good!..."


User currently offlineGlobalDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 237 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

the drawback to this plane is its range. It cannot do longer flights. It could never replace the 767-200.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7989 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1036 times:

However, the ATA 757-300's are flying the SFO-HNL route for Pleasant Hawaiian Holidays, so ETOPS operation is not an issue.

I think AA, DL and UA are kind of skeptical about getting the 753 because its sheer length means longer times for embarking and disembarking passengers; a plane wasting time on the ground doing this is not making money for the airline.


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7453 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

What is ATA's ETOPS rating ? Isn't it 6 hours to HNL. I flew LAX-LIH and it was 6 hours , on a UA 757ET . Doesn't a plane flying that long overwater need extra lifeboats ?


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7760 posts, RR: 16
Reply 13, posted (11 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

To fly mainland to Hawaii a twin needs ETOPS 180 certification.




Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Comments On The New DL Route? JFK-BOM posted Fri Dec 8 2006 09:16:17 by B773ER
Comments On The Terrorist Attacks posted Tue Sep 11 2001 21:19:34 by United Airline
Comments On The Worst Accident In Aviation History posted Wed Jun 28 2000 00:28:15 by Ben88
Positive Comments On The A340 posted Mon Jun 26 2000 06:58:25 by Dnalor
UAL Comments On U.S. DOJ's Decision On The Merger posted Sat Jul 28 2001 09:26:24 by United Airline
News On The UAL-US Merger. Comments? posted Thu Mar 22 2001 11:12:27 by United Airline
This Should Put A Smile On The Airbus Makers posted Wed Dec 20 2006 13:00:31 by Express1
AW Special Schemes On The A319, Candidates In SJO? posted Mon Dec 18 2006 08:23:42 by Tomascubero
FR Is Back On The London - Brussels Route posted Wed Dec 13 2006 11:59:13 by HBDAN
NZ Getting Real On The Tasman posted Mon Dec 11 2006 04:14:35 by Antskip