Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Recent PHL Closure  
User currently offlineJET_A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 735 times:

Does anybody know why PHL was closed February 24th at around 2000? Last Thursday night, I was aboard UA 1776 from IAD to PHL. If anybody knows UA well, they know about Channel 9 (From the Cockpit). I was listening to this and well after we were transferred to PHL approach control they decided to tell us that the field would be closed for an unknown amount of time due to a VIP arrival. We were given holding instructions, and the hold time got longer and longer. Our crew had to call dispatch to find out what to do since we were loaded light on fuel because of the great weather. We ended up going back to IAD to refuel where they put on "more than enough" fuel. So in United's efforts to save fuel by loading super light, they ended up wasting a lot! Anyway, does anybody know who the VIP was?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 644 times:

VIP movements are almost always The Prez or Veep. The airlines never get specific times as to when they'll be arriving or departing an airport, only the general hour. For example, the movement might be in the 2000z hour, but that could be anytime from 2000z to 2059z. If you UA flight was scheduled in *after* 2100z and the movement was running behind schedule (not an uncommon occurence), yeah, he didn't have the fuel for it. At least The Prez wasn't getting a haircut, like he did at LAX that one time.

All airlines, not just United, plan mimimum fuel loads where safety, legality, and weather allows. If airliners flew around with full tanks all the time (as is the myth) then fares would be much higher to compensate for the waste in hauling fuel around that's not needed. After all, fuel *is* weight, and the heavier the aircraft is, the more fuel it takes to keep the aircraft aloft. Proper planning (that's what I do, among other things) and monitoring of conditios ensures that fuel loads are appropriate to the operational circumstance. That may mean an occasional diversion, but you're not gonna run out of gas. I know Avianca 52 did just that back in 1990 neark JFK, but under the rules applicable to that foreign airline, their dispatcher wasn't monitoring the progress of the flight as was the case with US domestic airlines.


User currently offlineJET_A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 624 times:

I understand completely about the factors concerning fuel loads. I am a fueler for United; we work closely with load planning and the flight crews when concerning fuel service forms. The point I made was that with poor planning and not having enough fuel to anticipate this minor glitch, United wasted FUEL, the EXPENSE of fuel, and the TIME of all pax, crew, fueler, and controllers. This was an unnecessary delay. I feel that you got the impression that I was concerned about the safety of the flight. That is not true.
Please don't take my posts so personally, I'm not attacking your profession. It's one I hope to enter soon.

P.S. In your Topic: bar, you say, "You're PHL Experience." The proper phrase would be "Your PHL Experience."


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 618 times:

JET_A wrote:
-------------------------------
.he point I made was that with poor planning and not having enough fuel to anticipate this minor glitch, United wasted FUEL, the EXPENSE of fuel, and the TIME of all pax, crew, fueler, and controllers. This was an unnecessary delay. I feel that you got the impression that I was concerned about the safety of the flight. That is not true.
--------------------------------

Lot's of non-industry folks on here, and I didn't see you were a fueler from your profile. My point, perhaps missed, was that yes, it was indeed an unecessary delay in retrospect, but was it *preventable*? I don't know. If a VIP movement is running late, we're *not* updated due to security reasons, so it may have been something as basic as AF1 running lreally late. (I hate campaign season).


>>>Please don't take my posts so personally, I'm not attacking your profession. It's one I hope to enter soon.

Didn't take it that way at all. Again, didn't know you were in the industry.. Where will you be going to school for your ADX?

>>>P.S. In your Topic: bar, you say, "You're PHL Experience." The proper phrase would be "Your PHL Experience."

Mea culpa. 56K brain, 300 bps fingers.  


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 610 times:

JET_A wrote:
-------------------------------
.he point I made was that with poor planning and not having enough fuel to anticipate this minor glitch, United wasted FUEL, the EXPENSE of fuel, and the TIME of all pax, crew, fueler, and controllers. This was an unnecessary delay. I feel that you got the impression that I was concerned about the safety of the flight. That is not true.
--------------------------------

Lot's of non-industry folks on here, and I didn't see you were a fueler from your profile. My point, perhaps missed, was that yes, it was indeed an unecessary delay in retrospect, but was it *preventable*? I don't know. If a VIP movement is running late, we're *not* updated due to security reasons, so it may have been something as basic as AF1 running lreally late. (I hate campaign season).


>>>Please don't take my posts so personally, I'm not attacking your profession. It's one I hope to enter soon.

Didn't take it that way at all. Again, didn't know you were in the industry.. Where will you be going to school for your ADX?

>>>P.S. In your Topic: bar, you say, "You're PHL Experience." The proper phrase would be "Your PHL Experience."

Mea culpa. 56K brain, 300 bps fingers.  


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 604 times:

Name: OPNLguy
Date: 2000-03-02 20:13:15

JET_A wrote:
-------------------------------
The point I made was that with poor
planning and not having enough fuel to
anticipate this minor glitch, United
wasted FUEL, the EXPENSE of fuel, and
the TIME of all pax, crew, fueler, and
controllers. This was an unnecessary
delay. I feel that you got the
impression that I was concerned about
the safety of the flight. That is not
true.
--------------------------------

Lot's of non-industry folks on here,
and I didn't see you were a fueler from
your profile. My point, perhaps missed,
was that yes, it was indeed an
unecessary delay in retrospect, but was
it *preventable*? I don't know. If a
VIP movement is running late, we're
*not* updated due to security reasons,
so it may have been something as basic
as AF1 running lreally late. (I hate
campaign season).


>>>Please don't take my posts so
personally, I'm not attacking your
profession. It's one I hope to enter
soon.

Didn't take it that way at all. Again,
didn't know you were in the industry..
Where will you be going to school for
your ADX?

>>>P.S. In your Topic: bar, you say,
"You're PHL Experience." The proper
phrase would be "Your PHL Experience."

Mea culpa. 56K brain, 300 bps fingers.


User currently offlinePhilly phlyer From United States of America, joined May 1999, 317 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 610 times:

At 10pm it would have been the departure. The President was in town for a fund raising dinner.

I flew in from St. Louis earlier on that afternoon and found out that it was just before he arrived.


User currently offlineJET_A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 608 times:

Philly Flyer: Thank you for finding my question and not diverting the topic like OPNLguy and I did.

OPNL guy: My apologies, I probably overreacted to your response. I may have taken your feedback a bit personally myself. No, I am not currently enrolled at a school, but I am researching them. I'd like to get some actual experience in OPS before fully diving in. Right now, I'm planning to shadow some zone controllers and load planners in DEN, then dispatch in ORD. Any insight or helpful facts from you about the profession are truly appreciated!


User currently offlineJET_A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 599 times:

******************************************

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 595 times:

Info forthcoming to your email address...  

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ACY Wants To Be EWR/PHL Reliever posted Thu May 3 2007 07:03:12 by Vega
High Turnout @ FAA-PHL Airspace Public Mtg. posted Wed May 2 2007 13:50:13 by PHLBOS
PHL Accident? posted Wed May 2 2007 05:23:24 by Silentbob
PHL International Routes Of The Past posted Mon Apr 23 2007 23:02:29 by RafflesKing
A321 PHL -> SFO With Pit-stop posted Fri Apr 20 2007 20:07:39 by BWphoto
Help With Recent CO Flight's Registrations posted Mon Apr 16 2007 19:40:24 by STT757
1950 Aerial Pic Of PHL posted Sat Apr 14 2007 22:32:31 by Timz
How Has PIA Been Doing With Recent Aircraft Ban? posted Sat Apr 14 2007 08:10:54 by AlitaliaMD11
US To Expand MSY-PHL Service posted Fri Apr 13 2007 03:47:35 by MSYtristar
US Drops Seasonal PHL-ACK posted Sat Apr 7 2007 20:09:08 by Ack426