Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SK To Decrease Seat Pitch  
User currently offlineCaravelle From Norway, joined Aug 2000, 666 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 11 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1183 times:

According to the chairman of a Danish Pilots´Union, SK is to increase seating capacity in their current fleet by 5 - 7 percent, writes nettavisen.no.
The idea is to cram more pax in planes to make room for price cuts.
Is this a good idea, and will any of the other majors follow?

- caravelle


Trains and boats and planes....
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTR From UK - England, joined May 2001, 953 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1170 times:

Many airlines already operate with an awfull pitch of 31" or less in economy. SAS currently operate with 32". Since SAS only operate with a load factor of 70-75% there should be no need to cram more seats into the aircraft thereby reducing the comfort dramatically. There is a great difference between 31 and 31 inches of pitch though it may not sound of much!

User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1825 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1167 times:

In their economy class on narrow body planes like B736, B738, MD81, MD87 and MD90 I think they have a regular seat pitch that's difficult to think they could decrease, maybe they could reduce the number of rows designed for Business class they usually use for Economy due to the low demand.



User currently offlineSkystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 1127 times:

TR,

"There is a great difference between 31 and 31 inches of pitch though it may not sound of much!"

Hey, I don't find too much difference between 31" & 31"!  Smile

Typically, 'healthy' airlines operate with 75% load factors - if it's too high, it means that you're leaving pax behind at peak periods, and obviously if it's too low, you're not filling your planes up.

So, when you consider that the increased seating capacity would allow for more pax during peak "full" flights, there is some business sense in it. It's a very easy to way to reduce seat mile costs too.

As a passenger, I'm not going to laud such plans though.


User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1121 times:

Since SAS only operate with a load factor of 70-75% there should be no need to cram more seats into the aircraft thereby reducing the comfort dramatically.

People often assume that when a carrier reports a load factor of 70-75% that it means all the planes go out like that. Continental often has a similar load factor, but huge amounts of planes on many routes go out at 100% every single day. There are routes that have low loads and routes that are always full, and then of course there are some at 70-75%. The reason for the capacity increase is so that the flights with the ability to take more pax ...can

Jeremy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Seat Pitch - Threat To Health posted Mon Apr 4 2005 21:21:27 by ZRH
Delta To Increase Economy Seat Pitch posted Wed Oct 6 2004 15:46:18 by Ord
F Class Seat Pitch, AA 763 To HNL/OGG posted Wed Feb 11 2004 07:48:30 by HNLFlyboy
SQ Seat Pitch--B777-300ER posted Sat Dec 2 2006 01:50:37 by Iloveboeing
SK To Expand? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 14:13:13 by SK909
MEA / Bmed A321 Seat Pitch posted Thu Aug 3 2006 15:07:34 by Angelairways
AA Y Class Seat Pitch posted Mon Jun 26 2006 15:25:59 by Monkeyboi
EK Seat Pitch On 332 And 777? posted Fri Jun 9 2006 11:16:39 by Parisien
Have You Been Flying 10h+ With 29.0 Seat Pitch? posted Sat Jun 3 2006 18:49:06 by Bofredrik
SK To Be Fined For Chinese Attendants posted Tue May 30 2006 21:32:39 by EuroBonus