Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Neighborhood(s) Around Kai Tak..  
User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1198 times:

On the numerous pictures I've seen, Kai Tak is almost completely surrounded with those tall buildings...
Are those like the "Chinese" projects cause I don't know anyone who'd live in that big of a building near an airport? or are they in a respectable neighborhood. It musta be kinda cool for spotting puposes to live in one of those buildings, but probably sucks cause of all the noise..
I don't see how a plane never crashed into one of those buildings... With all those heavies flying so low over the buildings, you'd think some plane would have messed up and crashed...

Is this the reason Kai Tak was closed...

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFarman From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2002, 27 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1166 times:

Kai Tak was closed mainly because it had reached its capacity, there was no way of extending the airport and to give the long-suffering people of Kowloon City a break! The buildings near the vicinity of the flight path were restricted to 12 storey height and the whole skyline of this part of the territory was quite uniform in this respect, Now with Chek Lap Kok open, much higher buildings are being constructed.

As for plane crashes into the buildings, I cannot recall an incident of an airliner crashing into the buildings around Kai Tak, there have been several instances of mishaps on the runway (or aircraft ending up in the harbour) but most airliner crashes occurred on the opposite side of the airport on the ridge between Mount Parker and Braemar Hill which was responsible for the crash of a Cathay Pacific C-47 (VR-HDG) in 1949 and a Thai DC-4 of POAS in 1951, both incidents occurring in bad weather.


User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1095 times:

Farman is correct, I didn't see any potential danger with the buildings. I lived on one of the buildings just to the left of the approach (Beacon Hill) and it was great for spotting (if I had taken it up then). I couldn't see how a plane would have hit any buildings on approach unless it dived down very very low. But I think what has to be taken into account is that airliens that flew into Kai Tak, put their best pilots for this route.

Considering amount of aircraft Kai Tak handled, it's had less mishaps than many other 'normal' airports.

Again, as Farman pointed out, the closure was due to the airport reaching its capacity.

Trevor Slack



People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Do The Pilots Miss Kai Tak? posted Tue Jul 26 2005 15:31:58 by Emrecan
Only The Biggest In The Fleet To Kai Tak? posted Fri May 10 2002 20:24:57 by Godbless
How Long Was The Runway At Kai Tak? posted Mon Feb 4 2002 07:36:10 by Tristar2000
What The Checkerboard At Kai Tak? posted Tue Dec 25 2001 02:22:00 by Saab340
CNN Discusses The "scareports" (including Kai Tak) posted Thu Apr 6 2006 04:48:08 by SuseJ772
What Was The Last Flight Into Kai Tak? posted Wed Mar 8 2006 21:54:15 by Rossbaku
Kai Tak. SXM Of The East? posted Thu Aug 4 2005 00:10:16 by Pawsleykat
Sydney Airport, The Next Kai Tak? posted Mon Mar 22 2004 09:42:07 by Fuffla
The Kai-Tak Puzzle posted Tue Nov 5 2002 16:01:46 by Asgeirs
Video Of The Checkerboard Aproach At KAI TAK posted Thu Oct 3 2002 01:32:50 by Luisca