Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Flybe.  
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1544 times:

I work for flybe. based in Exeter, UK with large bases at Birmingham and Belfast City airports. We have recently changed our name from British European to flybe. We have also taken this opportunity to introduce a new colour scheme.

Basically i would like to know your opinion on our new colours, and if you have flown with us recently, what you thought of your flybe. flight. The following two photos are here to help those who don't know who we are, in any case, what do you think of our colours in general?

BAe 146-300 G-JEBE

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tamsin Zvereva



Dash 8 Q400 G-JEDL

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dean Barnes



Call it a bit of 'unofficial markey research'!

many thanks

regards

mike

42 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24936 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

I have to admit, I havent seen the new Flybe colours yet, but from the photos they look neat  Big grin
The British European c/s also look decent as well  Big grin



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Sorry old boy but to be perfectly honest I think it's simply ghastly.

It's unclear what the airline is called. I keep wanting to call it "Flibe" or "Fly-bee" and it all sounds terribly awkward.

Maybe MacJimmy thought it was a good idea, and perhaps the airline needed a more 'modern' and less 'British and regional' feel, but to me it makes you look like one of those awful summer charter operators and deserves a place in the Book of Bad Rebrands under the chapter 'Worst'.


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1504 times:

Like them.Yea.Saw G-JEDK at GLA in May and liked the scheme from the start.

User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1493 times:

Actually, I think I'm beginning to realise why I don't like it. It reminds me of Channel 5.

Plus your own airline name shouldn't be ambiguous. That's the first law of branding.

Just my opinion, and I suspect you'll get a lot of people saying they like it. Although I hope they give a more convincing explanation other than "it looks neat on photos"...  Insane


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1471 times:

Its more distinct than other other livery I can think of.With their shift towards the 'low-cost carriers' this may be perceived a a good thing.

User currently offlineBritair From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 933 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

I think the new scheme in itself is quite cool looking.....that is if you are a low cost airline. I think the name "Flybe" is ridiculous. After all the hoo-ha getting the "British European" name!! I think you guys have fallen into the identity trap. To the consumer it is very confusing to be both no frills and full service at the same time (that goes for bmi british midland and bmi baby too!!!). It seems such a shame to go from an award winning quality niche carrier to having a serious identity crisis! I have never flown BE/flybe but i had heard great things of the London City operations and Premium Economy product. Seems poor strategy for a fledgling carrier to turn its back on a great image just as it was beginning to gain recognition.

User currently offlineFpdonald From United States of America, joined Aug 2002, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1454 times:

fly.be.

What's with the two dots on the BAe-146-300? Perhaps a web page, but it pulls up nothing entered as such in my browser?

No, never flown on you . . . who are you?

Colors? Blue and skyblue surely aren't the best choice of a flying aircraft? However, not seeing it in person. Who is british european [small letters], and what is the significance of the red/orange/yellow blocked line? The tail flybe. logo is inconsistent on the Dash 8 and very difficult to read.

Billboard titles are one thing, but they have to be clear and free from clutter?

Where does this airline fly to?


User currently offlineBHXviscount From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1438 times:

fpdonald- British European use to be Jersey European and have now changed their name to FlyBe and they fly to domestic and european destinations from various UK airports From BHX - CDG(operated for AF)GLA,EDI,BRU,BHD(Belfast city)JER,GCI,SNN,ORK and TLS
HUYfan- I think the new colours are a breath of fresh air old livery was tired looking. Do you know why the EXT-BHX route was dropped?



No officer, its NOT a surface to air missile its a camera..for taking photographs.
User currently offlineAirchabum From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 769 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

Sorry, I thought 'British European' was a strong name but 'flybe' is a bit nothingy...doesen't really roll off the tongue! Maybe in a few years time every airline will be called buzz/go/zip/fly/toss or whatever but I prefer a name that gives you a rough idea of what it is (ie an airline) as opposed to something that sounds like a lawnmower or brand of washing powder!

I must admit I preferred the old colours. I've no idea what the logo was (something to do with Walker Steel maybe??) but they were bold and colourful and stood out, whereas I think the new livery is a bit plain.

Is the onboard service different from when the airline was BE/JEA or is it just a re-branding?



Biggidy biggidy bong
User currently offlineFpdonald From United States of America, joined Aug 2002, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

Thanks BHXviscount:

I looked through the drop down menu of our [Airliners.net] database and didn't find a single listing for flybe, but did find Jersey European Airways - some eleven pages thereof. Quite a few old, old colors, and many hybrids, but I think I can pick out the old color scheme. Indeed, I didn't search for flybe. or fly.be.

I'm splitting hairs, but was collectively asked . . . is the company fly.be. flybe. or british european? Again, why the dot between fly.be on the tail of the BAe-146-300? A fluke?

Why wouldn't the rebranding show more attention to overall detail, and carry over the familiarity of the old logo? If flybe. be it, was the red/orange/yellow so awful? As I brand, I think the more colorful stood out more than the blue/blue.

I'm an all or nothing guy, and on niche carriers I feel that attention to detail is even more important. Naturally, safety and service are ultimate.

The message in unclear, new colors OK, rebranding a failure. Flybe, connotates flybe [fly by] night. Not quite the message of a comrehensive rebranding, I'm sure.

Sorry, just being honest.





User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

ok........

looks like ive got a lot to answer to then. here goes:

firstly, i should clear the anme thing up. Our official name is now 'flybe', for ALL our flights, it is not a low cost sub of British European (which is what the 'be' stands for. I agree we have'nt specified this in full, and appreciate the confusion.

i can see the channel 5 thing happening  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

We offer a mid/low price no frills service. We have two products a) business on our LGW flights b) economy, where EVERYTHING apart from water,juice,tea and coffee is chargeable.

the two dots stand for the '.' in '.com' I also see the dots as confusing, they are not needed, but it is worth saying that on all our a/c the web address will be in full on each engine.

the orange/red/yellow line is a reminder of the british european colours our regular pax are used to, a sort of reminder of who we are.

EXT-BHX was dropped because we phased out the shorts360 and there were no spare Q200s in the fleet. I personaly think it woud be worth ordering another one, as the route did wel in terms of pax numbers, even if it was always half full with staff!

i didnt expect everyone to like the new flybe. and i am very grateful for your comments. Keep them coming and be sure i will keep everyone informed about the latest developments at flybe.

regards

mike


User currently offlineTwaneedsnohelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1377 times:

I'll join the chorus of posters in questioning the new name. "Flybe"? Stupid Stupid name. British European is much nicer - should have kept that.

That being said - the new color scheme is nice - refreshingly minimilistic and I'll tell you that Dash 8-400 is a very pretty plane. Much more attractive then the BAE.

Flybe? Don't like that at all.


User currently offlineJayce From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 520 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1376 times:

I agree with Backfire. It looks very unprofessional. I was a big fan of Jersey European and the old color scheme. It had class and a character all its own. This looks like some kids with spray paint attacked the airplane.


"Trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1327 times:

It works for me, much better than just turning the arrow around again as in the Jersey to British transformation  Wink/being sarcastic

I think the branding will catch on and there are certainly much worse liveries out there!

Cheers

Paul


User currently offlineBHXviscount From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1323 times:

well if like me you live in catchment area of airport that operates Flybe you will hear the annoying jingle advert does my head in but that may the point easy to remember and rebranding as 'low cost' as apposed to 'no frills' seems to be working from BHX, the jury is still out as far as name change for me but the Dash8 400Q's look great in Flybe colours Big thumbs up

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Derek Pedley




No officer, its NOT a surface to air missile its a camera..for taking photographs.
User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1294 times:

Hey - anything is better than the Air France livery you guys used to have all over your planes! At least people now know it's sort of a British airline they're flying with...

I like the new livery. But the rebranding exercise did end up a bit flawed - a few people on my course thought you were yet another no-frills, low-price airline, which, I think, is not entirely the case. I thought you were quite the opposite - some sort of niche business flier airline (with all those premium economy adverts).

The main threat is of drowning in all the confusion of new low-costers. Buzz, Go, Flybe, BMI (advertising itself as bringin low fares to LHR), BMI Baby, ....

I think people in the UK are getting confused about what each airline stands for. Ryanair and Easyjet are the only two low-fares brands that are sufficiently well-known. BMI seems to be desperate to try and confuse their passengers (going transatlantic and low-fares at the same time), and now flybe is joining in the club of confusers...

Next thing will be BA - probably rebranding themselves as Bee-Aye! - the low cost airline for people who like to spell!
(or the low-fares airline for "the world and his wife"? - nah, Buzz already jumped on that slogan after the BA adverts on TV, I think!)
 Wink/being sarcastic

Regards

Ikarus


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1288 times:

i see your point, but i have to say that the majority of our customers are regulars, and our biggest pax bases are BHX and BHD where we have almost EVERY black cab in flybe colours!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

We are advertising heavily, but i agree that it needs to be more clear about what EXACTLY we offer.

I dont think we should keep our business class product, as it doesnt fit well with our no frills economy product.

One other major factor is the aircraft we operate. The 146-100/200s are showing their age internally now, the -300s are'nt too bad, but are still dated by todays standards. The Q400s are a great plane for our crews and accountants, but the pax still shudder at the thought of 2 hours in a prop to Toulouse! I personally like operating on the 400s, they are VERY economical. The Q300s and 200s are ample for the markets they serve. The CRJs are up for sale so they play no great part in our future fleet plans. Obviously we studied the stretched CRJ 700/900 when BAe cancelled the RJX programme, but they are not suited to our routes. Our front runner is sewcond hand ARJs or F100s as 146 replacements. We hope to standardise around two types within the next 3-5 years, the 146-300 and the Q400 dash 8, this should help in streamlining our fleet for a more efficient operation.

It is my persoanl opinion that we should have done something similar to what NAS did by changing to a low cost, 737 operating carrier with main hubs in BHD, BHX and LGW. All of our BHD and BHX routes could support 737 services if they were sufficiently low cost.

regards

mike


User currently offlineAirX From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1277 times:

Hello,
I travel with flybe regularly and I generally am pleased with the service I receive. My last flight with them was in August on a BAe 146 LGW-GCI and again the crew were friendly,food/drink acceptable and the comfort average.
I like the prices they are coming up with; £50 to London is very good compared to what BA offer on their regional flights.

The colours are nice,I think they have put life back in to the BE aircraft especially on the 146 which was looking quite old and ugly.The name is ok but I prefer the more distinctive British European.
I will definitely carry on flying the airline as long as I receive the same level of satisfaction I normally get when flying them.

Regards Adrian.


User currently offlineBFS From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 739 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1241 times:

To be honest I have gone off flybe in teh past year or so, without having actually flown with them for quite some time. I live in Sheffield and go to Belfast quite regularly, so LBA would be quite handy for me. Having said that, the fares are just too bloody high, especially for a "low-cost" carrier. Aside from that I imagine they are fine - I last flew with the uner the Jersey European name, and was quite impressed.

By the way, what is happening with the uniform? Whenever I see any cabin crew at BHD they are wearing what I think is still the same ghastly JE uniform from the mid-90s, with the old logo on it and the big scarf. Is that the case, and is it to change?



User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 20, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1234 times:

F100s are an interesting choice - but do you get them into LCY? Thought that only the F70 is approved for this type of ops - and there are barely any F70 on the market. Same for second-hand Avros: none on the market yet with a very few coming the next two or three years, mostly ex-Swiss ARJ85/100. Is the EMB170/195 shelved for sure at BE?

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1221 times:

we are supposed to be getting new uniforms on Dec 1st  Smile/happy/getting dizzy and yes, we know, those 'tent wrap' things our hosties are made to wear are bloody awful!

in regards to a new aircraft, we would'nt need the F100 to operate into LCY, the Q400 is ample for all our LCY routes. The only reason the F100 is being seriously considered is because of the huge surge in used machines that will come about as a result of the AA/US fleets being taken out of service. Personally, i don't think we will go for the Fokkers, as nice as they are  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

the ERJ is still being evaluated after recently making a trip to our HQ in exeter. I've just seen some cabin pics, i would love to work on them! Alas, it is pretty well known company wide that the company doesnt want to add another type to the AOC, and so i am 70% ish sure will go for the ARJ-100 when they become available.

thanks again for everyone's input

regards

mike


User currently offlineBy738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2319 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1203 times:

any chance of flybe GLA-BRU?

User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1200 times:

no chance i'm afraid, we could'nt live up to the competition from Ryanair out of prestwick in terms of price, and our Edi-Bru route was'nt a great success anyway, same as the Newcastle. Personally, if it were up to me, i would put one of our CRJs on the route, but i dont run the company so.....

I also think it is stupid that we dont operate non stop GLA-CDG routes under the AF banner as on most of our BHX-CDG flights we get (usually) over 15 pax connecting in from GLA. A 3xdaily CRJ WOULD work, but again, it aint gonna happen :-(

I see that GLA needs a BRU service, but i think it would be more suited to someone like Bmi or bmibaby.

regards

mike


User currently offlineBHXviscount From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2002, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1161 times:

F100's!! er no thanks not at BHX -737 nice idea but no more 146's -146 capital of the world is BHX.
HUYfan-What has happened to milan from BHX is this route know not being considered as I think BE could take on BA on this route and win hands down!



No officer, its NOT a surface to air missile its a camera..for taking photographs.
25 HUYfan : the milan route was never even considered, it was a rumour that was spread by one of our pilots on his er.......unfortunate leaving the company! we co
26 Post contains images EGBB : Mike, You say the CRJs will be leaving the fleet now...When will this take place and will we see a CRJ painted in the new livery before they go? As fo
27 HUYfan : the CRJs will be leaving the fleet as soon as we acn sell them. There has been CONSIDERABLE interest and strong rumours going round that Sahara Airlin
28 Airchabum : Hi Mike It's probably been raised before but what are the reasons for getting rid of the CRJs so soon after they joined the fleet? The trend in the in
29 HUYfan : hmmmmmm....the CRJs, we love em, we hate em! If we had an ALL CRJ 100/700/900 fleet, they probably would be economical, but we only have 4. They are m
30 Post contains links and images HUYfan : sorry, you can cleary see the difference here: OLD (early version) View Large View MediumPhoto © Dean Barnes NEW (standard version) View Large Vi
31 Post contains links and images EGBB : Mike, Another new livery or did they run out of paint when they did this one? View Large View MediumPhoto © Derek Pedley Thanks for all the info
32 Kaitak : The new colours are fine by me, but my big concern is the fleet plan. I was actually very relieved when the RJX was cancelled because I hate the 146 w
33 Airchabum : Thanks for the pics...hadn't seen the 'old' version before. I would've thought the A319/735 or similar would be too big for most of the routes at the
34 Post contains images HUYfan : ok, here we go again EGBB, i have seen the a/c at bhx a few times,and don't know why it has'nt got the full livery, i would assume it had to be rushed
35 AirX : The low cost airline have not touched Jersey yet because the taxes are too high for the low cost operators.People want the low cost airlines but becau
36 Nighthawk : i believe FlyBE have been advertising for more cabin crew to be based at EDI. A new route on the cards or just having staffing problems?
37 HUYfan : in regards to the EDI base, we are recruiting cabin crew, our advert also mentions french speakers??? we are'nt taking back the EDI-CDG route as far a
38 SunCEO : Hey! I think it is great that people in the know are actually wanting our opinions... I like the new livery on the 146 but it looks a bit odd on the d
39 Post contains images EGBB : Mike, A couple more questions Q400s anymore on order? or is that it Exeter and Birmingham bases .. does this work well or do you think it would be bet
40 Post contains images HUYfan : i am not collecting opinions OFFICIALLY, it's a bit sad really, i work for one of the worst paying companies and i have only been with them a year, bu
41 Post contains images EGBB : For all that may be interested : I understand that Aircraft Illustrated will have a article all about Flybe when it comes out next week with some rath
42 Bmi : Ive flown BE on the BHX-EXT-BHX, BHX-SNN-BHX and BHX-EDI-BHX routes on SD360, 146-300 and Q400 aircraft and I must admit the best one was the lastest
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA & Flybe posted Sun May 3 2009 15:26:09 by Veeseeten
BBD; Bigger Q...eventually...Flybe Wants It posted Wed Mar 11 2009 01:51:07 by JoeCanuck
Anyone Think Air Southwest & Flybe Should Merge? posted Mon Mar 9 2009 09:38:08 by 8herveg
Current FlyBE EMB-145 Routes posted Sun Feb 22 2009 13:54:53 by NQYGuy
FlyBE -Book Flight & Get Free Redundancy Insurance posted Sat Jan 3 2009 03:59:33 by Gilesdavies
FlyBe ERJ145 And BAe 146 posted Tue Dec 30 2008 14:56:49 by Raid1wa
Flybe Pilot Cannot Make Landing, Returns posted Wed Dec 17 2008 15:05:18 by Golftango
Flybe. JER-HUY posted Wed Dec 17 2008 13:30:40 by HUYfan
Flybe Dropping NWI-DUB? posted Tue Dec 16 2008 02:08:23 by Signol
FlyBe Announces LGW-NQY posted Thu Dec 11 2008 12:12:34 by NQYGuy