Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Re-engining C-5s, B-52s; MD-11 Tanker  
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 952 times:

These jets are quite elderly, but they both still have long service lives ahead of them. I know that the C-5 is getting an upgraded digital "glass" cockpit from Collins (I might have the manufacturer wrong). When you consider how much it would cost to design new aircraft to replace them, the economics of upgrading make sense. Also, what do you think the MD-11's potential to be a tanker/transport similiar to the KC-10 is? I'd like to know.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Robert Pichler



6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAC_Veteran From Taiwan, joined Jun 1999, 726 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 874 times:

The MD-11 was -seriously- considered as an additional tanker/airlift model for the USAF but the idea was dropped. A designator number given as "KC-10B" for this model was brought up several times. It featured the strengthened floor and cargo handling of the KC-10A with a much more massive fuel offload/carry capability. At the time it was being considered, the C-17 was in a state of doubt and the fleet in service then was just entering into a period of strain.

Air Mobility Command, (then Military Airlift Command) was looking at several "off the shelf" airlifters like this one and a modified 747-400F model. (Of the 747-400F proposal, 12 models were being considered, 6 each at Travis AFB and Dover AFB respectively.) The primary mission for these "off the shelf models" were to handle channel AMC flights moving pre-planned cargo movement like military household goods, maintenance parts and so forth to overseas US bases. Post-Gulf War there was a -very serious- airlift shortfall with the C-141B operating under restrictions due to severe wing cracking outboard of the #1 and #4 engine pylons, which restricted altitude, payload, range and speed.

Add to that a remarkable uptick in overseas deployments after the Gulf and the result was pretty dire. I wont forget it. It worked out by contracting movement of channel frieght using air freight carriers like Southern Air, Konnie Kalitta, International CharterXpress, etc. This bought some valuable time and flexibility.
The C-141B fleet was fixed, overseas deployments eased -slightly-, the C-17 enters service at KCHS. Things started to settle down. So the idea to buy "off the shelf" airliners like the 744/MD-11 was then put to bed. I dont expect to see an MD-11 wear AMC grey, but it almost happened.

As for engine upgrades, it's very possible the C5 -could- receive a CF680 engine upgrade. Depends on weight and of course -cost- (G) The B-52 has also been the subject of engine upgrade studies to include PW,GE and even RR powerplants.

Regards
MAC


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 859 times:

The remaining P&W TF-33 powered B-52H models are to be re-engined with the same RR engines used on the 757. I believe the Air Force is contracting Allison to license build these engines for conversion to a four-engine B-52.

User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1010 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 856 times:

The Air Force has not contracted to re-engine the B52's. There have been studies, and it appears to be the wise move, but nothing has been funded yet. Hopefully it will be. I personally think it would be wise to use the PW2043 instead of the RB211E4B as the PW2043 is already on the C17, so in theory, it should simplify spares acquisition, cost, and storage, as well as possibly lowering the cost of all PW's for the C17's and B-52's. The improved readiness and dispatch reliability of the C5 with new GE's, PW's, etc. coupled with the new avionics suite looks like a great program. There however is not enough money for all of these programs, so which would you pick?

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 846 times:

Thanks for correcting me on that, I am in the NY Air National Guard and we get the AF Times newspaper every week. I remember seeing an article last year about the B-52 re-engining project where they were looking at the RR engine used on the 757. They were looking at having Allison license build them just like they did with the turbofan engine used in the Vought A-7D Corsair II attack jet which was a license built RR Spey.

User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1010 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 844 times:

I didn't know that about the Allison license build. That's good to know. Where are you located with the Air Guard?

User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 839 times:

109th Airlift Wing, NYANG
Schenectady NY

Our unit was responsible for airlifting that female doctor with breast cancer from the South Pole a few months ago. We are the only military unit that flies the LC-130 Skibird.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Re: MD-11 operators posted Thu Mar 4 1999 02:42:19 by MD-11
RE: MD-11 posted Thu Feb 4 1999 01:31:35 by United777
Ethiopian's MD-11: What's With The Tail? posted Thu Mar 5 2009 19:30:19 by ETStar
UPS 1441 Heavy CLE-SDF MD-11? posted Tue Feb 17 2009 20:11:34 by TrijetFan1
MSY Spotters: MD-11 On The Way posted Wed Jan 14 2009 10:32:30 by MSYtristar
Saudi Arabian MD-11 In LAS posted Wed Dec 31 2008 18:11:41 by Kleiner
Centurion Cargo Gets EX Gemini MD-11 posted Wed Dec 17 2008 06:22:48 by N27UADIESEL8
Does KLM Still Send The MD-11 To SFO? posted Wed Nov 26 2008 13:22:10 by Norcal773
Unmarked MD-11 At HEL Vantaa posted Tue Nov 11 2008 19:34:18 by LAXspotr
KL605 AMS-SFO - Mix Of 772 And MD-11 This Winter? posted Mon Oct 27 2008 01:45:26 by N593HA