Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
No Logo Lights On UA Tails What's Up W/ That?  
User currently offlineUALPHLCS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1693 times:

I noticed for sometime that UA did not light up there tails at night. With the dark paintjob UA planes are black holes roving around the airport at night. I finally asked a pilot who told me that UA eliminated the lights years ago in a cost cutting measure. I think its time to replace those bulbs and get some free advertising.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7447 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

Really,how much would a couple bulbs cost ?


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1660 times:

Let's see. About $5.00.  Yeah sure

Come on United... Get Real...

Watch them have an incursion one of these days.


User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1653 times:

Well there are other lights that are lit on, underneath and around the plane that make it visible. So the tail light isn't on? Big deal. Obviously, if the FAA didn't deem it safe then UAL wouldn't do it.

I'm not saying that it's an excellent idea on United's part. But it is pretty acceptable.



Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

I heard the main reason for tail lights was for advertising. I believe this was started by TWA in the 70s on their 747s. In no way does this have to do with safety(although it may help in some cases).

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineKestrel From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2002, 93 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1597 times:


I've also heard the reason for tail lights was purely to advertise the airlines logo, not as a safety requirement. All the a/c in our fleet of DC10's/Boeings/Airbuses have them, except for 4 of our 757's - which were ex-Eastern aircraft, and I believe around the 2nd,3rd,4th & 5th off the production line


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

I think UPS has their tail lights deactivated as well. I would think that it is mainly for advertising purpose but it can (in a way) be for safety, well, at least to an extent anyway.

User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1588 times:

FINALLY SOME ONE POINTS THIS OUT ! , i use to watch UA744 depart from AKL for LAX at about 8-9 pm ....which is pitch black and they never seem to have any lights on at all....so i could never got the reg of UA .....maybe its about time they either buy some light bulbs or change there c/s !

nzjet100


User currently offlineSkystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1582 times:

Logo Lights can enhance safety by increasing the visibility of the aircraft - I don't think anyone's going to complain about "glare" from the lights.

User currently offlineUPS Pilot From United States of America, joined May 1999, 871 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

UPS does not use logo lights. They are deactivated. This was done because it wasn't necessary to waste money on bulbs (they cost alot more than $5.00 as stated by a previous poster). UPS leaves from the cargo ramps @ most airports. These are typically nowhere near the passenger terminal. Even if they were they are so well lit you can see it's UPS. How many spotters are out taking photo's at night anyhow? The logo lights are usless for UPS.

User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1926 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

Logo lights are a big waste of money. The bulbs burn out often (cost is $30-$50), use up precious maintenance man hours (MD-11's take about two hours to replace) and are another exterior light which could cause a flight delay (exterior lights are the #1 mtc. delay item at DL). I agree that they do look cool, but if I see one on, I'll go up and turn it off.


This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

Everyday there are 2 UA B744s that fly into Singapore from the US and never once I saw any of their B744s have at least one logo light turned on. Some of them even have their runway turnoff lights burned out!


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4083 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1458 times:

well, if you're a UAL pilot at O'Hare, at night, and the controller says 'Follow Company Seven-Five to taxiway Tango,' those tail illumination bulbs...probably the equal to a McDonald's Value Meal #6 in cost...would help out. I'm with the earlier poster who brought up the incursion factor. Even if you're not a UAL pilot at O'Hare, but rather a pilot for some other carrier, you'd want to be sure you were looking at the right plane if the controller said to follow some 'black' 757 from taxiway to taxiway.

Chris in NH


User currently offlineUALPHLCS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1431 times:

This really isn't a saftey issue. I knew that when I wrote the post. I didn't realize how much logo lights cost. 30 to 50 dollars per bulb times 2 on every plane in the fleet. UA has How many planes in the fleet? Roughly 500, so lets slit the difference and say the buld cost $40x1000 thats $40,000 plus add in the extra bulds for inventory and the labor to reactivate and replace the bulbs when they burn out.

I'd rather have my retro check so I change my mind this really insn't free advertising.


User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

chrisnh,
when you sit in a dark room while you taxi, you probably don't have that big of problem seeing the company jet right in front of you. While WE sit in the cabin and the lights are dimmed somewhat, we have a problem seeing the planes out our little portal, they don't have that same problem.

united has a cool paint scheme(IMO) and who cares if they don't turn their logo lights on. I would like it, that's UAL and remember we are hurting right now. Innocent


ual 777 contrail


User currently offlineUALPHLCS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

UAL777contrail,

I just read the "other info" line in your profile. Chicago Bears to the Superbowl 2002 2003!!!??? Is there anyway I can take you off my respected user list. I need a new respected loser list.  Wink/being sarcastic

Bears are going to be crushed tomorrow, by the team that IS going to the Superbowl this year. The Eagles baby all the way.  Acting devilish

Off topic I know I'm sorry but had to be done.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No RNO-ORD On UA? posted Tue Sep 19 2006 04:56:40 by Cleared2land4
Why No Unlimited Upgrades On UA? posted Tue Aug 17 2004 19:01:20 by ORD2PHL
AS710 PDX-PHX On A 4+ Hour Delay? What's Up? posted Tue Jun 22 2004 08:54:48 by Flashmeister
No Seat Assignments On UA International Flights? posted Sat Jan 3 2004 16:16:32 by Ams
No CC Required On UA Now. posted Mon Sep 1 2003 16:40:57 by UN_B732
No Advanced Seats On UA? posted Sun Aug 25 2002 17:20:22 by Parisien
Why No BUR-ORD On AA Or UA? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:47:40 by Travelin man
No More E+ On UA (for *G/S And Full Fare Pax) posted Wed Sep 13 2006 19:57:12 by ManchesterMAN
Why No Late-night JFK-SFO/LAX Flights On UA/AA? posted Fri Feb 17 2006 06:47:30 by RJpieces
Logo Lights No Longer Used posted Thu Jan 19 2006 19:22:57 by A300 American