Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AirTran's Next Aircraft?  
User currently offlineSWALUVFA From United States of America, joined May 2002, 277 posts, RR: 5
Posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2379 times:

737-800 or A320 ???

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIronchain15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Just a rumor, but I thought I heard something about MD-80's for long range flights.

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

Seeing how they just agreed to lease a couple of dozen more 717s (ex-AA/TW), I don't see either the 737 or A320 in their future. More likely, IMHO, that you'll see them pick-up used MD-80 or -90 series aircraft for the longer flights, so they can have at lease some degree of commonality with the 717s. Don't know if the pilot type ratings are common, but at least some parts would be...

User currently offlineNonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

It's the CRJ.

Brian


User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2257 times:

I actually don't think it would be a bad idea for AirTran to stick with the 717 and basically flesh out their current niche; that is, no transcon service, no international service, but continue to focus on building profits and customer base for the next three or four years.

Steve


User currently offlineFlyer732 From Namibia, joined Nov 1999, 1367 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

Yeah, its the CRJ.

And Boeing owns a bit of us, so I bet we stick with Boeing.


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 6, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

I've heard they've been looking into the A319/A320 and 737-700/800.

MD-80/90 was brought up a while ago, but I think AirTran wants an aircraft that actually has a long future ahead of it.

While the MD-80/90 will be around for a long time, they are no longer under production, so there future isn't as vast as the A320 series or 737NG series.

I bet they'll get 737-800s. I remember someone mentioning that they want a much larger aircraft than the 717-200 when they begin long-haul routes.

I wouldn't rule out Airbus either.

NonRevKing,

Not really. The CRJ will be owned and operated by Air Wisconsin. They will fly under the AirTran JetConnect name for AirTran. Like United Express for United.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offline9V-SVA From Singapore, joined Aug 2001, 1860 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

I should say the Boeing 737-700/-800 winglet-equipped aircraft. Boeing owns a stake in AirTran and AirTran is obligated to buy Boeing aircraft.

9V-SVA



9V-SVA | B772ER
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2152 times:

FACT:

AirTran is not considering any new aircraft at this time. The 737-800 was looked at, but the showcase model was returned to Boeing. At this time, AirTran's expansion and route plans call for more 717-200s, and that is all.

The only new aircraft for AirTran right now is the CRJ-200, operated by Air Wisconsin as AirTran Jet Connect.

And no, type certification of MD-80/MD-90 and 717s is different, largely because landing/takeoff characteristics are different and the cockpit of the 717 is all glass, while the MD-80/MD-90 are mostly standard avionics (though some have been replaced in some models by digital readouts).

OPINION:

AirTran will eventually pick up either the 737-800 OR convince Boeing to start construction of the 717-300, the larger, longer range version that is only in blueprint, while picking up MD-80s/MD-90s to fill out the routes until the 717-300 can replace them.



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2111 times:

How about AirTran want getting new B737-900?!? Y'all guess what are you think about with AirTran want goes on 737NG.

User currently offline717fan From Switzerland, joined Nov 2001, 2017 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2046 times:

They're still hoping that Boeing builds the 717-300. Read FlightInternational of last week!

User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2033 times:

Ain't gonna happen!
.
.
.
.
.
.


User currently offlineGr8slvrflt From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1608 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1989 times:

I think the 737-800 is likely but not for a couple years at least. However, the industry is changing so fast its hard to predict. If the majors continue to scale back operations as much as they have been, the LCCs will have a lot of opportunities to expand. AirTran is already much larger than it expected a year ago and expected growth for 2003 is also more than planned just a few months ago. Who knows?


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 12 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

AirTran will not acquire any MD-80-90 a/c because they do not want any a/c in their fleet that are out of production. If AirTran can convince Midwest Express to come onboard the project, the 717-300 may be a viable program. Midwest Express will need to replace their MD-80 family a/c a few years down the road, and AirTran needs an a/c with longer range and more pax capacity. With AirTran being the largest 717 operator, Boeing will do what it takes to keep AirTran happy, and away from buying any Airbus products. It would take more than just an order from AirTran to launch the 717-300; the plane is still on the drawing boards so to speak, and a final design has yet to be finalized. The question is how many 717-300s would AirTran need? My guess is that they would need between 25-40 717-300 for future growth, and such a small number of a/c does not start up a new production line. With the other 717 operators (and future operators) added to this, there may only be a demand for under 100 of these stretched 717s from current operators. But perhaps if Boeing does launch the 717-300, it may get orders for them from airlines that currently operate MD-80 family a/c, but considering the state of the industry right now, to only companies that seem to be getting new a/c are the leasing companies.

User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7669 posts, RR: 27
Reply 14, posted (11 years 12 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1908 times:

Ummm 25-40 aircraft is certainly a HUGE order (for expansion for that matter) for an airline the size of AirTran. Think of all the other fixed costs associated with that much expansion in terms of labor and capital.

You don't think these type of carriers too are waiting to see how things shake out. Obviously they know that their future could become more difficult too. The big question is what will happen when the playing field becomes more level and the cost structures level out between the "Majors" and "Low Fares" Its obvious, that in one way or another the majors that do survive are going to have much lower costs. Its also a fact that the current young low-fares carriers are going to experience a rising cost structure as the airline matures. It will be interesting to see how market share and customer preferences shake out. These airlines aren't gonna be expanding at break-neck pace until some sort of certainty develops again in this industry.


User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1802 times:

PSU.DTW.SCE -

I don't think the order of 25-40 aircraft is very large at all. AirTran just announced the delivery of 23 additional aircraft for next year, and ORDERING, certainly does not mean they will all be DELIVERED in one lump sum. Look at the number of A320s on order at jBlue. An order of 30 aircraft to be delivered at a rate of 1 - 1.5 a month for expansion purposes is certainly within the growth infrastructure of AirTran, especially as we condense the fleet to one aircraft type (finally) and can truly "look forward".

Travi


User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1763 times:

Travis, What do you mean 1-1.5 a month. Are they going to deliver half of the aircraft and then deliver the next half next month  Big grin  Smile

In answer to the question, It will be either N997AT or N979AT  Smile


User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

Simply means delivery of 18 aircraft in a year. Some months may be 1 aircraft, some months two, but would average 1.5 aircraft a month.

Travis


User currently offlineBA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8564 posts, RR: 54
Reply 18, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1741 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I understand Airtran are asking Boeing for a longer range 717-200 first.That is not such a difficult task,however Boeing won't want to until additional or new customers to commit to the type before they fork out money to modify and certify a new model.

Given the current market conditions the market looks very bleak for the 717.The CRJ-700/900 and soon EMB-170/190 will do the same routes for far fewer $.While the A318 has few orders at the moment,it does have the range and it has the advantage of being built along with the whole A320 family, so it is not a stand alone production line.

Boeing are under pressure from all sides.They need to make a stand and decide if and what they are doing with the 717.

Rgds

BA319-131



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlineLymanm From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 1140 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1695 times:

In addition to Midwest Express, could Spirit also within the next 5-10 years be looking for an MD80 replacement? These two, combined with Airtran, could perhaps generate enough of a market for Boeing to go through with the relatively low R&D cost of the 717-300. Just a thought...


buhh bye
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7669 posts, RR: 27
Reply 20, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1654 times:

Spirit's business model does not go for the purchase of new aircraft. They have a near endless pool of used MD-80's to draw from as necessary. They do just fine using previously owned aircraft and their cost structure does not support being able to pay for a fleet of brand new aircraft.

User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1615 times:

There is some misconception here.

Boeing approached AirTran about launching the 717-300, not vice versa. The reason AirTran doesn't want it as proposed? The 717-300, as designed, does not have an MD80 wing, but rather a DC9-50 wing. It is not a replacement for the MD80 series of aircraft. The increase is in capacity, not range. A 717-400, or redesigned 717-300, both of which would be YEARS away, would be more likely to fit AirTran's needs.

For the short term, AirTran is therefore looking at an increased-range 717-200 model to address it's expansion plans. But a second aircraft type will surely be decided upon in the latter half of 2003.

Travis


User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6646 posts, RR: 24
Reply 22, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1593 times:

I think over time Boeing is going to try to wean AAI off of the 717 and move them into the 737.

There are few customers that have shown any interest in the 717. AA, CO, DL and WN (some of Boeing's most loyal customers) have all turned down the 717 and do not want another fleet type. NW wants to keep the DC9's around for another 10 years and after that they will replace the DC9's with a mix of A319's and RJ's. Few European, Asian or South American carriers have expressed much interest except for a few tiny orders which aren't enough to sustain the line.



User currently offlineManuel From Portugal, joined Aug 2004, 1 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day ago) and read 1455 times:

When stretching the 717-200, can't Boeing use parts of the MD-87 and MD-90 design? I know the characteristics of the 87 and 90 are to some extent different compared to the 717, but all three planes derive from the same basic design, so there must be commonality in many parts. This way they would have a 717-300/400 with a greater capacity and the greater range of the MD-87/90.
Just a thought....


User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (11 years 12 months 5 hours ago) and read 1344 times:

Yes, there is a commonality of parts between the 717 and the MD-87/88/90, but that commonality is similar to the commonality of the DC-90 and the MD-81/82/83. It doesn't make up enough of the aircraft to be all that incredibly similar.

However, you are right. I don't know the actual number, but I imagine the 717 and MD-80/90 series aircraft share about 40% commonality of parts.

And as far as the 717-300 having the DC-9-50 wing, that's the wing the 717-200 has. So I can't imagine that was a breaking point for FL ordering 717-300s. The 717 is designed to replace the DC-9, not the MD-80/90. There will probably never be an MD-80/90 replacement. The 737NG serves the same purpose.

And the 717-200ER concept could certainly be used. There is PLENTY of room in bin 2 of the 717 for additional fuel, similar to the MD-83. The real question is weight and balance.



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
25 BR715-A1-30 : And as far as the 717-300 having the DC-9-50 wing, that's the wing the 717-200 has. WRONG!!!! The 717-200 has a wing based on that of the DC9-34. Trav
26 Yyz717 : There was an AirTran article in a recent Flight Intl issue. The CEO stated that thet are not looking for a larger aircraft. They ARE interested in an
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airtran(FL) Aircraft W/winglets? posted Tue Aug 8 2006 19:36:45 by Stealth777
Next Aircraft For Midwest? posted Sat Mar 4 2006 00:47:39 by Steeler83
AirTran's 100th Aircraft posted Tue Feb 22 2005 18:29:48 by Travatl
What Will Be US Airway's Next Aircraft Purchase? posted Mon Aug 30 2004 15:45:20 by BoeingPride800
ORBIS's Next Aircraft? posted Sat Jul 19 2003 22:51:44 by CPH-R
Photo Of The Next Aircraft You Will Probably Fly.. posted Mon Jun 30 2003 17:06:22 by Hoons90
Flying Airtran Next Week, What To Expect? posted Tue Jul 9 2002 19:35:59 by Alitalia744
Airtran Next Cities posted Thu May 2 2002 03:50:17 by Usairways85
AirTran's Next Move.. Well Future Actually? posted Mon Jan 21 2002 04:50:15 by Jcxp15
Whats Boeing Next Aircraft Going To Be? posted Sun Feb 13 2000 00:29:10 by JetRanger2000