Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BUR (Burbank) - No New Terminal  
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5803 posts, RR: 15
Posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1370 times:

The Burbank Airport Authority voted yesterday to drop plans for a new terminal to replace the current complex. The new terminal has long been tied up as area residents attempted to tie building a new complex to imposing nighttime curfews. The FAA has wanted the terminal replaced since the existing building sits only 300 feet from a runway centerline.

This may turn out to be only the latest chapter not the final word. Behind the scenes politics may still be going on.

Various media stories on Friday's decision:

http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200%257E20954%257E980026,00.html
2 different LA Times edition articles
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/burbank/news/la-blr-letter9nov09,0,2113629.story?coll=la%2Dtcn%2Dburbank%2Dnews
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-burbank9nov09,0,5760655.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dpe%2Dcalifornia




"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFedExHeavy From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 226 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1320 times:

I'm not surprised, Burbank has quite a few NIMBY'S, leave it to some jerks to ruin the possibility of expanded ops at BUR because they can't a hear a few minutes of Survivor what a bunch of crap. BUR is long overdue for a change, although I personally have no problem with the current terminal and how it's set up, let's face it, something better can be built. This also goes to show the selfishness of those who oppose the new terminal, although it would no guarantee that Burbank would get more connections to more cities because of a new terminal, it was a possibility and might have given some relief to the growing problem with not having enough gate space at other L.A. area airports, which has been discussed on this forum many times. I find this news sad and hopefully, eventually BUR will get it's new terminal..., well I can dream can't I?

"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."
Have a nice day! Smile/happy/getting dizzy
FedExHeavy



So far this is the oldest I've been.
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1301 times:

I'd rather see increased service than a new terminal, in any case. So hopefully airlines will work what they can with the existing facilities.

Steve


User currently offlineFedExHeavy From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 226 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1297 times:

I agree that increased service is more important than a new terminal, but every little bit helps.

On a similar note has anyone heard of increased service at BUR, besides Aloha?
Have a nice day! Smile/happy/getting dizzy
FedExHeavy



So far this is the oldest I've been.
User currently offlineJabpilot From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 423 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

Aloha is adding a BUR-OGG flight in February. DB Air charter airline is supposed to start BUR-JFK in December but for now I'll call them "Don't Bet" on it Air!

Other BUR news...AA is down to 3 daily flights to DFW, cutting back to 2 a day after the 1st of the year. The morning UA flight to DEN is now a A319, which is the first time UA's brought Airbus equipment to BUR.

Jeff

User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1242 times:

When I worked for Los Angeles County Aviation Division from 1984 to 1987, I represented the County at numerous BUR Noise Committee Meetings, and the plans for a new terminal was an often discussed topic. That was over 15 years ago, and the thing still hasn't been built, or even approved, and from the above, appears that it might not ever.

Leave it to the NIMBY's, enviromentalists, and the bureaucrats (I can say that: I'm both originally from LA, and I work for city government at MSY) of California to screw up and either forever delay (as they did with the 210 Freeway extension), or terminate a project. No wonder nothing gets done in California in a logical length of time.

I've wasted too many of my already limited number of brain cells on the BUR terminal issue. If the locals want keep using that old relic (although it does have a certain charm and history to it), so be it. I'll keep on flying into ONT or SAN to see my family.

Tom in NO (at MSY)



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5803 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1207 times:

Leave it to the NIMBY's, enviromentalists, and the bureaucrats (I can say that: I'm both originally from LA, and I work for city government at MSY) of California to screw up and either forever delay (as they did with the 210 Freeway extension), or terminate a project. No wonder nothing gets done in California in a logical length of time.


Fortunately, they seem to live mainly in the coastal areas around LA and the Bay Area.

California has become a state split into East and West instead of North and South. Much of what people consider California to be about is true along the coast but not the inland areas. High housing costs, freeway traffic jams, NIMBYism, etc. originates in Western California. For example, Gray Davis (the more liberal of the major candidates) was reelected governor last week. But look at how the counties voted:
http://vote2002.ss.ca.gov/Returns/gov/mapB.htm
He carried almost no counties east of the coastal mountains. Same thing happened in 2000 with Bush/Gore.
http://vote2000.ss.ca.gov/Returns/pres/mapA1A.htm

Those wanting to do business in California are realizing the inland areas are the new growth areas. Also, families pushed out by high housing costs are now moving inland. Yes, we're subject to some of those state laws passed by the coastal areas, but less of the local craziness found in Western California.






"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BUR & City Of Burbank Reach New Agreement posted Thu Jun 24 2004 20:50:15 by FATFlyer
FAA To BUR: No New Term? Give Back Our Money posted Wed Jul 2 2003 19:23:32 by FATFlyer
FAA: BUR Does Not Need To Build New Terminal posted Fri Dec 20 2002 18:12:52 by FATFlyer
Would A New Terminal Help Bur? posted Fri May 25 2001 02:40:54 by FedExHeavy
SXM New Terminal Update? posted Fri Dec 15 2006 00:56:13 by Daron4000
OneWorld At JFK And AA's New Terminal posted Wed Nov 8 2006 20:22:20 by NYC-AIR
RDU Airport- New Terminal C posted Sun Nov 5 2006 05:49:21 by MEACEDAR
SXM - New Terminal Opens Wednesday 25 October posted Mon Oct 23 2006 18:56:43 by ACAfan
Saint Martin - Opening Of New Terminal posted Wed Oct 18 2006 16:17:09 by DernierVirage
Extreme Engineering: JetBlue's New Terminal posted Wed Oct 18 2006 05:25:43 by TacSupport1