Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AirTran/Vanguard/Pan Am(III) Nibbles On USAirways  
User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1272 times:

First, I would like to say I had to take a leave
of extended absence from this board due to one of
my uncle's death. It feels wonderful being back on
this board again.

Now, has anyone noticed that AirTran, Vanguard,
and Pan Am(III) are starting to add flights in
Pennsylvania, USAirways' territory? Vanguard and
Pan Am(III) will be moving into Pittsburgh while
AirTran appears to be opening a mini-hub in
Philadelphia. I'm thinking that these airlines
believe USAirways' FA's will strike. What is
your opinion on this issue?

I would like to hear from you people and start
conversing again like old times. Take care, and
good night to all.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRominato From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 268 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

I don't think the moves are made specifically on the premise that the FA's will strike... However, if that happens, it can't hurt those three. I think Pan Am III will be in and out in no time. They just don't seem serious about trying to be a legit air carrier. Case in point, visit their website. Parts of it haven't been updated in months... it's terrible.

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10992 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

Of the three, only Airtran is anywhere near a threat. And on top of that, they aren't setting up a hub in Philly. 5 flights that aren't to ATL does not equate a hub, I'm sorry. On top of that, US ran them out of Philly and Dulles once already, and that was before Metrojet. They can do it again.

US has a lot more to worry about with other airlines such as UA and DL and their labor issue.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineHypermike From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1001 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1057 times:

I still believe that the true threat to US Airways in a labor strike will be Southwest. Again, Southwest is sitting on two gates at PIT. Those two gates can mean upto twenty flights a day for Southwest, and don't think for a minute that Herb isn't thinking about this.

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10992 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

Yeah, well, Herb just also lost a plane. Don't forget that they are stretched to their limits and can't get planes fast enough. If it had not been for their BUR mishap, they might have been able to do something at PIT. But, now it's doubtful.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineCritter From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 267 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1051 times:

I think it is ironic that Airtran's new director of route planning and markets is a former USAirways employee. I believe that he was instrumental in setting up the Metrojet ordeal before W&G got and now can't decide what they want to do with it. Airtran loads are very good out of PHL and don't be surprised if they start doing more point to point flying as they recieve more 717's

I also agree with Rominato, PanAm III is just a flash in the pan. They really don't seem to be whole hearted in their attempt.

P.S. Southwest is overated!!!!!!!


User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1024 times:

I saw that there is a new Concourse F under construction at PHL airport, however, it looks like that it is destined for USAirways. You think if things go to hell for US, it will go to AirTran?

Take care, and good night.


User currently offlineAirplanekid From United States of America, joined May 1999, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1023 times:

Concourse F will be the new commuter concourse for US Airways Express.

User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1002 times:



Airplanekid wrote:
-------------------------------
Concourse F will be the new commuter concourse for US Airways Express."

That's even better! The terminal would be perfect for AirTran's 717s.


User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1000 times:

US used MetroJet to run AirTran out of Dulles. Personally, that wasn't necessary. United had more of a threat from AirTran than did USAirways. Unfortunately, United has decided to punish MetroJet at Dulles and they are actually succeding.

Yes, AirTran did poor with the PHL-BOS route, but I don't think AirTran will be ran out of PHL so easily this time around. Sure, Wolf can put all of his energy on AirTran and then what do you have, an FA strike because he failed to meet their needs, instead, wanted to drive a low-fare out of PHL. After all he can only do one thing at a time. And then AirTran can return and profit from USAirways' absence.


User currently offlineLHMark From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 7255 posts, RR: 48
Reply 10, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1005 times:

US Airways had better watch out! Look for them to buy several new A319s and fire up the price war machine to keep the new Pan Am off of theat oh-so-profitable cash-cow Portsmouth NH-Pittsburgh route.


"Sympathy is something that shouldn't be bestowed on the Yankees. Apparently it angers them." - Bob Feller
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10992 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

Dudes. I think there are an awful lot of mistaken people about UA vs. Metrojet, and Metrojet vs. Airtran. First off, the big rampup that UA did when US started building on IAD had only one shared route with US: IAD-BOS. And that came a whole year after US began 15 daily flights IAD-BOS and return. So, to say that UA beat US and MJ at IAD is really silly because people really aren't doing their homework.

Second, MJ didn't run Valuejet/Airtran out of the IAD-BOS market, mainline US Airways did, and again, this was long before UA got off its duff and did anything but bleed. UA didn't even match Airtran's fares. I know this from experience because I travel this route very frequently.


"Yes, AirTran did poor with the PHL-BOS route,"

You mean they got their butt kicked...

"... but I don't think AirTran will be ran out of PHL so easily this time around. Sure, Wolf can put all of his energy on AirTran..."

Airtran is flying to US's fortress hub, to all of 3 destinations. Do you really think it requires much effort to fly more jets at lower fares to defend the hub? The yield management computers probably handle that already.

"... and then what do you have, an FA strike because he failed to meet their needs**, instead, wanted to drive a low-fare out of PHL. After all he can only do one thing at a time. And then AirTran can return and profit from USAirways' absence. "


I think you are quite mistaken on the roles of management. First off, any Chairman/CEO/President/etc. that can only do one thing at a time will find himself either fired, or run out of business awfully quick. That's just not going to happen. Currently, US is handling F/A negotiations, (surprisingly well, I may add), accepting delivery and introducing new planes to the fleet, orchestrating a possible merger with AA, organizing a new advertizing blitz at the conclusion of the F/A issue, and dealing with the little parasitic competitors like FL, Vangaurd and PA.

** I'm not sure if you meant to give a very onesided report about F/A issues, but please do realize that you can easily turn this around and say that the problem is also that the F/As failed to meet management's needs. It is a two way street.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineCritter From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 267 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1002 times:

You really think that anyone ran Airtran out of IAD? It's like this! The bean counters at Airtran looked at the route structure, loads, future markets, market share etc. and said, we can either stay in IAD and make money or we can open up more cities and make more money. Not to mention the fact that by opening more cities and adding more frequencies to various markets they can attract a larger customer base. This was all done in anticipation of adding point to point flights at a later date, as evidence by the now open PHL to Forida markets. As I already said don't be surprised to see Airtran adding more point to point flights as more 717's roll off of the assembly line at Long Beach.

Airtran turns a profit with a low 60% load factor and that is with fuel hungry DC-9's. That is only going to get better with time as the 717 becomes the predominant a/c in the fleet. The 717 is a mere 20% more efficient in fuel alone not to mention the savings in maintenance, spare parts, etc. This all translates into a harder time of running them out of any market when the competition has to fill 70% or better of their seats!


User currently offlineUA744Flagship From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 990 times:

Hey DLX,
Turning all Cali Surfer, eh? I guess the dude comeback has made its way to the east coast, as our "dude" fad/revival happened about a year ago  


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10992 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 975 times:

Dudes. I've grew up on that word. Believe it or not, in the suburbs of DC, it is quite often used, but not quite with the same tone as like those bodacious totally awesome Cali types.  


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week ago) and read 965 times:

D L X:
AirTran had several more routes out of IAD like IAD-MCO and IAD-MDW. I agree w/ you on the fact that US finished AirTran on IAD-BOS and IAD-MCO but MetroJet was the one that pushed the stake into AirTran's heart at IAD. IAD-MDW was going nowhere so AirTran abandoned it and said adios to their hub.

As for PHL, AirTran flies into Delta's fortress hub which is much worse than USAirways' PHL.(I think it is a mallot pounder to have a competitor w/ high frequency plus widebody aircraft) True they have less flights there but that doesn't mean things can change...

P.S. If Wolf performs all those multiple tasks then he must be one stressed man. (Or is he? Since BA is looking at him should something happen.....)

Critter:
AirTran makes money wherever they can(The philosophy of any low-fare). If they were making money in IAD I'm sure they would have stayed. If they felt PHL was also another money-maker, well hey, two hubs in the northeast isn't so bad now is it?!!  

P.S. I liked your point on the 717s w/ AirTran and how it will help them in the future.

Also, I have been told that the Gulfport/Mirage Resorts contract is expiring soon. If AirTran abandons Gulfport look for more flights. As of where, perhaps PHL, ATL, and/or MCO, or a new city.

Take care "dudes" and good night


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pan Am III's Limited Carry-on Policy posted Tue Nov 6 2001 17:01:48 by Panamair
Pan Am III Website Updated! posted Wed May 25 2005 16:26:17 by AkjetBlue
Yet Another Pan Am III (IV?) Thread posted Tue Mar 8 2005 03:57:33 by Kimmykun
Pan Am III Back In Business! posted Thu Jan 6 2005 22:05:41 by Akjetblue
Pan Am III - Now IV? posted Mon Nov 1 2004 00:40:05 by Theiler
Pan Am III posted Sat Aug 21 2004 21:22:38 by Clipperaurora
Potential Pan Am III Problems posted Tue Nov 26 2002 22:54:46 by Theiler
Pan Am Iii? posted Sun Nov 17 2002 03:22:37 by Laserjet
What's Happened To Pan Am Iii? posted Sun Sep 22 2002 10:42:51 by Laserjet
Pan Am III posted Fri Feb 15 2002 19:54:45 by Gsoflyer