Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is 717 A Regional Jet?  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2086 times:

I saw an advertisement showcasing some of the best or widely used regional aircraft including commuters and such which also included a picture of a Boeing 717. Why?

Furthermore, when is a plane considered regional? (Note: I may have asked that question before a while back...don't remember though)



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2068 times:

Difficult to say. I would actually classify the B717-200 as "RA" = Regional Airliner. Aimed at regional routes but above Regional Jet standart. Into this group the EMB-170/175/190/195 and the FA7 and FA9 belong, too.

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders




Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineIronchain15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2063 times:

I do not know exactly, but I think that describes the 100-seat market. I have heard the older DC-9 Series 10 be called a regional jet before, even though I honestly do not think it is.

User currently offline717fan From Switzerland, joined Nov 2001, 2017 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2044 times:

Regional Airliner, thats the perfect name I think. Its an airliner who is flying on regional routes, who can be handled at small airports etc.....

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2027 times:

If a rule is made without regards to a particular size just operation, then they must apply to all aircraft!

So if a very large aircraft (your choice) happens to be "flying on regional routes, who can be handled at small airports etc.....", is it still a regional airliner?

I see a double standard.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineTurbolet From Cape Verde, joined Nov 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2005 times:

One could make an argument both ways.
I myself don't think the 717 is a regional jet. At its maximum passenger occupancy, it can take over 100 ppl, that's my first reason. Secondly, it can fly quite a distance. I would put it in the same category as A319/320, MD-80 and 737-300/400/500
-turbolet


User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1983 times:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/836207/4/


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1384 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1920 times:

Same thing applies for the RJ100-Bae 146-300 it can hold well over 100 passengers in a 1 class 6 abreast config. but is it RJ yes because of the type of routes they normally fly. The 717 and RJ100 are because of range, the fulfill a Niche along with the Fokker 100.


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

This is a difficult question. Whenever I am asked this question, I immediately think of the DC-9 series (which includes the MD-80 and MD-90) since the 717 is truly a DC-9 series aircraft.

It's design is based entirely on the DC-9 series and was infact considered a shortened MD-90 by McDonnell Douglas before they were bought by Boeing.

Lets not forget that when McDonnell Douglas was still around, it was called the MD-95.

Saying that the 717 is a regional jet is like saying the entire DC-9 series are regional jets. That's how I see it. Some may disagree.

These days, the term "regional jet" is really irrelevant. Regional jets like the CRJ are flying routes that 737s used to operate on and even longer ones. Therefore they aren't so "regional" anymore. They're being used on routes that a regular airliner would fly on.

The 717 really was an aircraft designed to fly routes a 737 would to some extend. The 737 has more range, however there are so many routes 737s fly that a 717 could fly. This is what I believe the 717 was designed for.

While originally true regional jets like the CRJ, Avro RJ100, ERJ-135/140/145 series aircraft were designed to fly routes that turboprops currently fly and slightly longer routes.

However we all know that's changed. We're seeing CRJs cross 2/3 of the United States now.

Simply put, no the 717 is not a regional jet. Just like it's old brother the DC-9-10. I have never ever heard the DC-9-10 being called a regional jet and it isn't classified as one either.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

That's right i don't think the 717 is a regional jet either. Remember this plane is really an MD-95 and Boeing just renamed it the 717. True none of the DC-9's are classified as regional jets so why the 717?

User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2173 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1700 times:

Just a reminder, the 717-200 is MUCH larger than the DC9-10 was.

Travis


User currently offlineBucky707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1028 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

I think the real question is, are the Bombardier and Embrear aircraft "regional jets"? The only difference between a regional jet and a non regional jet is the label. The so called RJs are being used on long routes that certainly are not regional. On the other hand, some airlines use 757s for flights under 45 minutes, which is certainly regional.

User currently offlineBwc1976 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1516 times:

Isn't there also usually a difference in how large a bag you're allowed to carry-on? I'd be curious to know exactly which planes have room for the normal sized bag (same as you'd have on an MD-80, 737, and larger planes) and which don't have as much capacity and make you drop it off by the side of the plane.



User currently offlinePothiabs From United States of America, joined May 2001, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1472 times:

The definition of "regional" is never made, but airline management, as well as manufacturers like to use the word "regional", because it gives them an argument to impose lower wages for flight crews.

Regional route :
* Below a certain traffic threshold ? ( Paris-Papeete could become a regional route, although 16 hours flying distance apart )
* Below a certain distance ( miles or minutes ? ) (A Lufthansa A340 flying between FRA and MUC on a Monday morning would be a regional aircraft ?)

Regional airport :
* having less than a certain amount of passengers per year ?
* Having a runway that is less than X meters long ?

The discussion is extensive, but I would prefer to call the Embraer, Canadair and B717 alikes "small jets".

Many "small jets" are not able to fly into airports with relatively short runways, and are often used to increase frequencies on destinations that are already served in Narrow Body equipment, only to attract more high-yield pax.

Small jets , big money-makers !
("Regional" is just for those who buy it, for example pilots)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bright Future For 717 Regional Jet? posted Thu Oct 26 2000 06:06:01 by MCOtoATL
Delta/Comair Canadair Regional Jet 400.What Is It? posted Thu Sep 22 2005 21:22:33 by Motif1
SAS Is Re-joining *alliance Regional Jet Program posted Fri Mar 26 2004 17:50:25 by Eric
Just What Is A Regional Jet? posted Tue Jan 13 2004 10:38:05 by United4ever
717: Not A Regional Jet posted Sat Jun 1 2002 00:13:03 by BR715-A1-30
What Is The Best-Looking Regional Jet? posted Tue Dec 18 2001 21:53:24 by CanadianDC10
What Is The CRJ440 Regional Jet? posted Wed Dec 12 2001 00:36:38 by SFOintern
What Is Your Favorite Regional Jet? posted Wed May 30 2001 21:09:19 by NWA ARJ
What Is The Best Regional Jet? posted Wed May 9 2001 02:55:47 by NWA ARJ
JAL Delay Regional Jet Order posted Thu Nov 30 2006 19:13:40 by Dougbr2006