Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAA Forced To Route Atlanta Flights Via Sal  
User currently offlineSAA201 From South Africa, joined May 2001, 512 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2475 times:

Hi all,

A local newspaper, Pretoria News, reports that new FAA legislation regarding fuel reserves on B747-400's is forcing SAA to route its non-stop Atlanta to South Africa flights via Ilha do Sal in the Cape Verde Islands, effective this week. This adds another 90 minutes to the journey. The New York to Jo'burg flights don't appear to be affected at this stage.

Are there other airlines who have been similarly affected by this legislation? (Perhaps Qantas etc. out of LAX?)

If this ruling remains in force for a while, I wonder if SAA might consider placing its new A340-600's, when they are delivered, onto the Atlanta route instead of to Hong Kong or Frankfurt. I have heard that the A340-600 is capable of operating full payload from Cape Town TO Atlanta non-stop (can anyone confirm this?), thus eliminating the need to stop at Sal in both directions. Also heard that the A340-600 is able to fly out of Johannesburg TO New York with a decent enough payload to make it a viable option.


21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32737 posts, RR: 72
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2374 times:

This is just wishful thinking, but I am hoping this means SAA leaves ATL and goes back to FLL or MIA. Highly doubtful with the strong Delta partnership, though, so it will not happen. SAA would love to make the stop FLL instead of SID, but since 9.11, the FAA has not allowed them too!


a.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

How is this news? South Africa to Atlanta has always been a 1stop... whether it was via Cape Verdes or Ft. Lauderdale

User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2359 times:

ConcordeBoy, it was non-stop one of the ways.

User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2356 times:

That is so stupid..I was on the ATL-CPT non-stop this summer and it was a cakewalk compared to the stop in Sal on the way back..Oh well what can you do though with the FAA..AndI bet the flight attendants and pilots would love to stay over in FLL rather than ATL.

Later,
Jay



Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

It was always Non stop from Atlanta but not from South Africa.


Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlineCMK10 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2350 times:

I took SA201 and 202 a couple years ago and on the way from JFK it was a non-stop and on the way back from JHB it was a one-stop. I didn't mind, I was able to take Isla De Sal as my eleventh country.
DC-10's Forever



"Traveling light is the only way to fly" - Eric Clapton
User currently offlineQantas777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 484 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2350 times:

wait wait, are you saying from ATL-South Africa there is a stop now?

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2338 times:

I have heard that the A340-600 is capable of operating full payload from Cape Town TO Atlanta non-stop


According to Airbus' website, the A346 has an 8631mi range at 380pax. ATL-CPT is 8129mi. Since SAA's 744s dont carry that much, if they were to install the same pax configurations in the A346 as in the 744, then they probably could operate the roundtrip nonstop. Though for them, it may make more financial sense to add more seats, and continue the westbound stop.


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3013 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2296 times:

Don't believe the hype on Airbus' website that the A346 can carry anywhere near 380 passengers. Speculation is rampant that the "real" capacity is somewhere around 320-330.


Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2277 times:

Of course it could carry 380 passengers or more - it depends on the cabin layout chosen.

A regular 3-class cabin will have much less, though.


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3013 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2278 times:

Also, according to the range performance charts at

http://www.airbus.com/product/a340_a600_performance.asp

The range at MTOW is right under 6000 nautical miles. Range at full pax+baggage is 7500 nautical miles. JNB-ATL is 7333 nautical miles according to Great Circle Mapper. They will only be able to take a little bit more cargo at full pax load, MTOW will be impossible with A346. Either that or less cargo, more passengers, but not both.

They could probably fly the A345 at almost MTOW from JNB-ATL

http://www.airbus.com/product/a340_a500_performance.asp

But it would be close.



Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2260 times:

Jtamu97 - I agree, being safe and all is so stupid!  Yeah sure

User currently offlineNonrevman From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1297 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2239 times:

According to the electronic schedule, the flights are still nonstop to either JNB or CPT from ATL. However, there was always a stop in the westbound direction.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2238 times:

Regarding FLL and so on, the SAA website has a lot of data and their future plans.

http://www.flysaa.com/about_saa/fleet_information/fleet_renewal.html

Not just planes but routes too. Its a PDF. You'll like it.

I wonder how much Cargo they're hauling on the 744 presently. If its not much, maybe full pax+bags would be fine for them. They could probably do a two class config that works well for them.

I'm amazed that JFK is 400nm closer than ATL. Great Circles never cease to amaze me.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

"Don't believe the hype on Airbus' website that the A346 can carry anywhere near 380 passengers. Speculation is rampant that the "real" capacity is somewhere around 320-330."

I rarely believe much of anything Airbus spews... and sadly, Boeing has been inching toward that distinction lately (with all the Sonic Cruiser and Bat-wing B.S.) as well  Sad

Speaking of, is Airbus taking into account the weight of fuel on their graph of the A346's range? If not, then that contraption probably cannot carry the tonnage that they're advertising either. I see no specific mention of fuel being calculated into the graph at all.


User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2173 times:

Flyf15..All I am saying is thatSAA has flown this route for years...So why now is that they have to make a stop from ATL....Safety should never be jeopardized, however the FAA should have done something along time ago...I remember when United flew Non stop from JFK to South Africa and at one time was labeled the longest nonstop flight but no FAA restrictions then. Anyways, also once you go through the new security harrassment at Sal at 2 am you will see why trying to avoid Sal is on my list.

Later,
Jay



Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlineSAA201 From South Africa, joined May 2001, 512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2068 times:

Here is the story from available at: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20021209055456894C156980

Island stop makes SAA's Atlanta hauls longer

December 09 2002 at 05:54AM


All South African Airways flights from Atlanta in the United States are to take about 90 minutes longer because the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a directive that the carrier's planes must stop at Ilha do Sal, SAA officials announced on Sunday.

The FAA had said that SAA planes would not be allowed to refuel in Atlanta until manufacturers completed investigations into fuel pump reliability on all Boeing 747s and 737-800s, SAA's chief executive, Andre Viljoen, said in a statement.

This meant that long-haul flights from Atlanta would have to refuel on the Cape Verde island, off West Africa.

The change means that SA210, which leaves Atlanta at 10.30am each day, will stop in Ilha do Sal at 9.45pm for 90 minutes and arrive in Cape Town at 9.30am instead of 8am and in Johannesburg at 12.30pm instead of 11am.

SA212 is to leave Atlanta at 10.30am and arrive in Ilha do Sal at 9.45pm, Johannesburg at 9.45am and Cape Town at 12.55pm (all times are local).

Normal schedules are expected to resume by mid-January.

"As usual, SAA will take all precautions to make sure that the safety of its customers will not be compromised," Viljoen said. - Sapa


This article was originally published on page 5 of The Cape Times on 09 December 2002


User currently offlineSAA201 From South Africa, joined May 2001, 512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2045 times:

Also see: http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/972561/?PHPSESSID=4cf8afa976e0fc90dcc815749a990edd

User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2020 times:

Thanks SAA.. Now that makes total sense to stop in Sal now since they cannot refuel in Atlanta. I was under the impression the FAA changed the ruling on reserves and was making them stop in Sal even after fueling in ATL. It seems though that SAA could maybe leave a little earlier from ATL so we could still arrive in South Africa around the same times..Sure was nice to be one of the first Aircraft in Capetown for the day


Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1051 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

"The FAA had said that SAA planes would not be allowed to refuel in Atlanta until manufacturers completed investigations into fuel pump reliability on all Boeing 747s and 737-800s..."

Can someone explain this to me, please?
It sounds stupid and unfair to me. Why the heck are they not allowed to refuel at ATL? Other airlines are, right? DL would go bankrupt in 2 days if they weren´t allowed to refuel their A/Cs at ATL. Or does it mean no 747 and 738 are allowed to refuel at ATL at the moment?
Thanx in advance...

Stratofish



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 21, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1887 times:

I'd imagine it'd still suck for DL not to refuel their 738s in ATL.

N


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SA To Route JNB-IAD-JNB Flights Via DKR posted Sun Mar 26 2006 21:48:17 by SA7700
Future EK Flights To South America Routed Via FRA? posted Fri Nov 4 2005 20:11:09 by Avianca
SAA Codeshare To Vienna Via Zurich posted Fri Sep 23 2005 11:49:23 by CraigW
Air Atlanta Europe To End Gatwick Flights? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 09:38:47 by 747boy
Air Gabon Forced To Give Up Long Haul Flights posted Sun Jun 12 2005 16:29:26 by Soups
SAA Likely To Introduce Go-hungry Flights posted Tue Nov 2 2004 07:27:20 by ETStar
Abidjan Implodes,Air France Route Flights Via Lome posted Thu Mar 25 2004 22:37:24 by Donder10
SAA Soon To Go Daily On JNB-GRU Route! posted Mon Oct 27 2003 00:14:31 by Dellatorre
SAA Atlanta Flights posted Mon Jul 1 2002 23:51:45 by SAA201
QF 001/002 To Route Via HKG posted Fri Jun 15 2001 05:10:47 by BLACK BOX