Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Easy To Remember Airline Domains  
User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1092 times:

I haven't seen this discussed or mentioned here yet, so thought I would post it, even though it is a month old.

SITA in early November announced that a new standard in airline domains would be implemented as signed off by the IATA airlines at a conference in October.

The standard is basically that the IATA airlines will implement their 2 letter IATA designator as their website address. Some airlines are also expected to change their email system from their current to the new SITA standard.

3 airlines have so far signed up for this initiative:

http://www.ba.aero
http://www.cx.aero
http://www.nw.aero

SITA says this will be especially handy for frequent travellers who already know the 2 letter/number identifiers for their airline.

I would expect that most airlines would sign up for this new initiative, but I wouldn't expect their email systems to change much. The airlines, when dealing with the public would want to keep their "brand" in their email, but this will be especially attractive when it comes to communication between airlines, especially if they keep the Type B standard (as SITA has suggested) for the .aero domain.

I also wouldn't expect the airlines to get rid of their current domains altogether. Most of the are "brands" in themselves, and there is a danger for the airlines if they were to be forced to adopt this initiative, e.g. all airlines change over to this new system, along comes Joe Public who doesn't know the first thing about the airline industry. He lives in Dallas and wants to fly to Mexico on American Airlines. Not knowing the 2 letter designator for American, he puts www.am.aero into his browser, and gets taken to the Aeromexico site, and it results in a lost sale to American.

I know this is probably as dull as dishwater to most of you, but for those of us who have dealt with SITA products in the past, this is surely another step in the right direction for the group in streamlining their airline communications.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGF-A330 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1085 times:

A very good idea, if you ask me !

User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6573 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1081 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

not really.. if Mr. Public gets to aeromexico but wants to travel on american. he will go back and try to find american's site.

unless the aeromexico site forces you to buy a ticket..

i dont see many "lost" sales to happen this way. if Mr. Public doesnt care which carrier he flies (ie not to bother to find Americans web site) he prob woul use travelocity or similar to choose the lowest price

if he blindly buys just beacase he happens to be at one particular site he is better refered to as Mr. John Q Stupid



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1071 times:

I am just looking at the SITA website now and have found a couple more airlines which have also implemented this:

http://www.ae.aero
http://www.ci.aero
http://www.na.aero
http://www.ne.aero
http://www.ta.aero
http://www.un.aero
http://www.zb.aero

Other airlines which have also registered, but not yet made live their domains are

ay.aero
by.aero
qr.aero
s7.aero
ua.aero
ul.aero
vs.aero

Also, it seems that the .aero domain is really taking off in Russia in particular, with airlines such as Siberia, Transaero, AVL, Karat and others taking it on board quicker than airlines from the "west" (who seem to be staying with their .com).

It would be interesting to see exactly how many airliners.net members would know what airlines these represent without either going to them, or looking them up.


User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1067 times:

I would find some webpage faster than now but it is only an advantage for people who know the IATA designators. It is a nice idea but only when every airline would still have a regular web address like this: http://www.alitalia.com for all who do not know the two letter codes and http://www.az.aero for all who know the IATA codes.

Patrick


User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1056 times:

Mt99

How many times have you gone to a shop with the intention of buying ProductA, but when you get into the shop you see ProductB first. You pick ProductB up and see that it does exactly the same thing as ProductA and is of comparable price to ProductA. You then don't even bother looking at ProductA and take ProductB with you to the checkout.

Sound familiar?

The same thing happens with the net.

Plus with the net, you also have companies which take advantage of consumer errors (by mistyping the URL) and offer similar products to the company you meant to go to.

Here is a prime example, except the company in question has smarted up to this tactic and has registered the domain.

Type into your browser the following

B-I-R-T-I-S-H-A-I-R-W-A-Y-S.COM> with out the - in between each letter. Also note the spelling

If BA have cottoned onto this idea, there is something in it, right?


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2386 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1053 times:

It'll make for some boring airline billboard liveries! Somehow I don't thing Virgin Blue will want to change from www.virginblue.com.au on the side of the 737s to www.dj.aero!
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © David Morrell



User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1048 times:

You can also type in q u a n t a s .com an you will land on the regular QF site.

Patrick


User currently offlinePzurita1 From Greenland, joined Sep 2002, 1392 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1044 times:

Avianca, Aces and SAM all combined are Summa alliance.

Well, instead of av.aero, you get to summa.aero

PZ



Next flight: IAH-DBX-MRU-ANT
User currently offlineLZ-TLT From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1013 times:

Well....nice to see just another flop going on.

There was an attempt to introduce new top level domains in 1998/1999. However, is has not emerged from the need of new top level domains, but by political reasons between Network Solutions and various Internet Authorities. By then, main goal was to deprive the IANA(Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) of its responsibilities and transfer it to other organizations for commercial reasons. By this time, the IANA under the leadership of internet pioneer John Postle was pursuing a policy which prevented certain groups of further commercializing of the net(or choking more profits just for the sake of it). With John Postle's death in late 1998, the problem was solved for these groups. As for these ridiculous new top level domains - almost nobody took them in 1998, just a few have taken them since.

SITA's idea is just a plain ridiculous trial to push up these top level domains and bring them to popularity again. Altough it could make idea to use the 2-Letter Codes for some kind of internal structure(think of it just about a big SITA Intranet), the idea doesn't hold water, since it provides just a base for a think almost nobody needs. And for the regular customer - well, let's say it with Gordon Bethune and his "Row 5" test:

Given you want to implement this "innovation". Well, get onboard of an Ryanair or CSA flight, pick a passenger(if you want, pick somebody from row 5) and ask him, what he thinks about accessing the website of the airline he's flying just by typing in fr.aero or ok.aero He will stare at you and ask it what it's all about. Explain to him why it is so. He will say you're a jerk and ask you why not access the websites just by (even blind) typing in "ryanair.com" or "csa.com" Test failed. Enough said - another brainless "innovation" born in the brain of dumb managers.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Report Presses Easy Ways To Fix Airline Security posted Sun Jun 5 2005 06:30:51 by Schipholjfk
So Easy To Pretend You're An Airline Pilot... posted Thu Dec 30 2004 15:28:03 by Pe@rson
Easy/hard To Identify Airline Codes posted Thu Jul 1 2004 15:45:53 by September11
How To Speak Airline-Ese posted Fri Feb 2 2007 19:49:26 by Aviateur
Length Of Time It Takes To License Airline? (UK) posted Tue Jan 9 2007 05:22:05 by DCAYOW
News Article Gives Insight to New Airline - Paramount Airways India posted Sun Oct 29 2006 16:35:52 by Babumushai
What Does It Take To Be Airline Management posted Wed May 24 2006 22:44:28 by PAHS200
Is It Easy To Spot Federal Marshalls? posted Tue Apr 4 2006 09:13:40 by Superhub
Is Lax A Hub To Any Airline? posted Mon Mar 27 2006 23:12:36 by IAH744
Pilots:How Easy To Switch A/c Type When Replaced? posted Tue Jan 31 2006 18:57:22 by RootsAir