Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United's Place In The LHR Four (Bermuda II)?  
User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

Sorry if this has been discussed but which American airline do you think will replace United in the Heathrow Four (The 2 American and 2 British carriers allowed to operate transatlantic service to LHR according to Bermuda II) if United does not manage to survive? Let's not forget that both United and American got their Bermuda II rights because the original designated carriers went bankrupt. Interestingly enough, we may have the same situation again....Methinks, it will be Delta but what do you think? And it will be great if you are familiar with the process of choosing carriers for that agreement to share with us.

Thanks in advance and best regards,
VS11

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16862 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

(IMO) If UAL goes under DL will take UAL's NRT hub and beyond rights and CO will take the LHR operation, but CO does not need or want all those LHR flights so I would assume there would be some serious lobbying to allow CO and DL to split UAL's LHR slots in exchange for letting BMI into the LHR-US market.

Making it three US and three British carriers operating US-LHR, Good compromise (IMO).

Also allowing the 6 carriers with Heathrow-US flights the right to fly from any US city without restriction to LHR, thus allowing DL to fly from ATL and CO to fly from IAH to LHR.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1532 times:

I do not think that it will go that far to negotiate the whole BII treaty. It will not make sense to have a new treaty in place as the EU and US will have in the foreseeable future a blanket agreement to cover all air traffic issues.
If United goes under, it will be up to the US government to appoint a new carrier. I am not sure if the UK needs to approve the US government choice but the question in my opinion will be which US carrier will the US government pick, and why?

regards,
vs11


User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12436 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

The departure of UA from LHR, if it comes to that (and I think it will) may actually solve problems in that it means that the new US operators will come into LHR without new slots having to be created, something which would be very difficult with the current limitations.

Ironically, the problems in its STAR Alliance partner would allow BMI British Midland to enter the US market, which would be a part of the deal to allow new airlines in. I doubt if it would be restricted to just two airlines. NW and US will want their share as well. When there was a proposal for AA/BA to give up a large amount of slots at LHR to allow more US carriers in, the plan was to allow DL to operate four or five JFK routes, to ATL and (I think) one to CVG. I think CO was to operate to IAH and EWR and NW, to DTW and MSP.

One interesting development would be the change to the cities allowed to access the US from Heathrow. Previously, IAH, ATL and DFW have all been stuck with LGW. Obviously, with the new developments, ATL and IAH would move to LHR and BA would presumably move its IAH and ATL flights to LHR. But what about DFW? Both airlines operate their flights from LGW, but it hardly seems fair for DFW to be stuck with LGW while IAH gets access from LHR? Might there be a change here?


User currently offlineUsairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3402 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

its not as easy as just letting everyone move from LGW to LHR. IF UA ever gives up its LHR slots there are a lot of them, however there aren't enough to had out to all the other US carriers, NW, DL, US, CO; then to allow BA to switch its flts from IAH, ATL, and DFW to LHR, and then finally allow BMI to start service into LHR.

The BA/AA deal is a whole other story, it could happen whenever, 3 months from now or 3 years from now, and IF UA ever gives up its slots that could be whenever. IF the two ever happen they could be 2 years apart.


User currently offlineOrd From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

"Let's not forget that both United and American got their Bermuda II rights because the original designated carriers went bankrupt."

The above statement is completely false. United bought Pan Am's LHR rights in October 1990 (and started service in April 1991), prior to Pan Am filing bankruptcy. And American bought TWA's LHR rights shortly after, again before TWA went bankrupt.

United's LHR rights aren't going anywhere. They will not make the mistake of selling them off.


User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1482 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

First of all, UA won't be in any rush to give away their LHR rights, that will only happen if the money men decides United needs to offload some of it's assets.

If (big If) UAL does leave LHR, me thinks Delta is the most likely, but NW and CO might not be too happy at the prospect of DL getting all LHR slots. If these slots become available then i expect open skies agreement to begin with Dl leading the pack for the slots. Don't forget BMI who'll be sniffing around for these slots too.

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

I think B747-437B said something like this in another post:

The same agreement that allows CO to place its code into LHR also guarantees them first dibs should LHR rights become available.


User currently offlineJrlander From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1104 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1388 times:

If UA stops serving LHR, whether through restructuring or through liquidation, I think either NW, CO, or DL will get the rights. I think that Delta might be able to benefit the most from them, due to its market shares in NYC, BOS, southern Florida, and the DC markets. CO could benefit from their EWR hub. NW could benefit as they could serve DTW and MSP ( I think that Ber II allows a US carrier to serve LHR from MSP, though I could be wrong ). But these two markets are not as big as the JFK and BOS markets. In any case, if the proposed CO/NW/DL alliance goes through, I would expect whichever carrier gets the access to serve LHR from all cities with major operations of one of the 3 carriers. For instance, if DL got them, I would expect them to fly to LHR from JFK, BOS, EWR, DTW, MSP, etc.



User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1380 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If DL gets access to LHR, JFK,BOS,ATL,CVG are routes that are certain to be commenced.




In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineJrlander From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1104 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1362 times:

Arsenal@LHR,

Bermuda II would have to scrapped or at least changed to allow service to ATL and CVG. If Delta gets the rights under the current treaty, ATL and CVG service would remain from LGW.


User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

ORD -

I admit that I am not entirely familiar with the transferring of LHR rights from PanAm and TWA to United and American, but I do believe that the rights were sold because of financial diffulties. Again, I may be wrong but I do not think that TWA and PanAM would have sold their LHR rights if they did not have to. Even if they sold them prior to filing bankruptcy it must have been more of a better timing issue, in terms of getting a better deal out of it. At least, in the case of PanAm, it went bankrupt in 1991 I believe so the few months do not really count. I do not know TWA's story, I admit.

regards,
vs11


User currently offlineCoronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1175 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1314 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

NWA may have the lift capacity for LHR and support DL and CO. DL is parking is MD-11's. NWA continues to operate over 30 747's another 23 DC-10-30's and has 36 A330 on order or on option with deliveries starting in 5 months. If NWA needs to move some aircraft to increase service to London from SLC, ATL; JFK; ORD; etc KLM probably can cover for them on other routes.

NWA seems experienced enough in operating international service from airports that are not their primary gateways including international service from BOS; LAX: SFO: SEA: IAD; LAS etc.



The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1299 times:

VS11--TWA didn't sell the London routes(BWI and PHL-LGW went, too) because of financial difficulties. Carl Icahn(who raped...er, excuse me, owned) TWA at the time progressively cooked the books to make the London routes unprofitable. Yeah, right.

He then sold them to AA for $400M+. Amazingly, AA made money on them and TWA sunk further into financial ruin. Anyone who forces UAL to sell LHR routes is certainly not interested in running an airline.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16862 posts, RR: 51
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1252 times:

CO and DL still have plenty of aircraft waiting to be pulled back from the Dessert (DC-10s, MD-11s etc) and plenty of furloughed pilots who want to work, they also have lots of defered aircraft Boeing would love to delivery.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1246 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Bermuda II would have to scrapped or at least changed to allow service to ATL and CVG. If Delta gets the rights under the current treaty, ATL and CVG service would remain from LGW.

Indeed. If UA goes down under and sells LHR slots, i expect Bermuda 2 talks to start again immediately with UA's free slots available. Nobody's gonna wait around when LHR slots are at stake.




In Arsene we trust!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Spotting Place In The World? posted Tue Nov 5 2002 06:27:04 by Spark
What's The Point Of Bermuda Ii?!? posted Thu Oct 25 2001 00:08:28 by Airplanetire
What Is The Oldest Plane Flying In The LHR posted Wed May 16 2001 18:49:27 by Westjet_8
United Interested In The A3XX! posted Fri Oct 6 2000 03:39:04 by BA
United Airlines In The Early/Mid 80's posted Fri Aug 13 1999 20:49:27 by Dazed767
If Bermuda II Isn't Lifted In The Next Few Years.. posted Wed Apr 11 2001 17:33:35 by Englandair
Longest CRJ-200 Flight In The United States? posted Tue Dec 5 2006 20:37:33 by B737-112
All-male United Airlines Flights In The 60s posted Mon Jul 31 2006 21:16:56 by Incitatus
United Airlines Logo In The Eighties posted Thu Jul 6 2006 17:12:37 by NA
Google's 767-200 Registered In The United States posted Thu Jun 15 2006 05:42:46 by UA777222