Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Airbus Flights For New Orleans!  
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6564 posts, RR: 51
Posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2402 times:

As of 2/1/03, both F9 DEN-MSY nonstops will be flown with A319's. This is good to see, as MSY already sees too many 737's on a daily basis.

On a side note, it looks like US Airways will be expanding A320 service into New Orleans next month, with about 5 flights a day on that aircraft. Also, look for Sunday A321 service to Charlotte to start next month.

And for something completely unrelated to the topic but still pretty damn cool, starting 1/1/03, seven out of nine Delta flights from Atlanta to New Orleans will be flown with Boeing 767's. Gotta love it!

Tom..what's the scoop with jetBlue moving to Concourse C? Seems like they should have used gate C1, they would have had it all to themselves.
I also heard that CO is moving to the Delta lobby very shortly.


Steve in New orleans

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2378 times:

Arent C1, C3, C5 reserved mostly for int'l arrivals (TACA and charters)? I know F9 took one of them. Perhaps moving B6 into another would be too much...

From what I hear, WN is to someday take all of Concourses A and B, just as "soon" as CO, US, and NW can be moved elsewhere.

Also, you may be thrilled if the rumors are true and LH chooses to initiate nonstop service here. My only hope is that they'll use one of their neat new A330s (not likely) instead of those yucky A340s.


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2301 times:

My only hope is that they'll use one of their neat new A330s (not likely) instead of those yucky A340s.

Why should it matter, the cabins are nearly identical. The A330 isn't any more comfortable......



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2287 times:

"Why should it matter, the cabins are nearly identical. The A330 isn't any more comfortable......"

No technical reason other than the fact that I generally prefer traversing longhauls aboard twinjets as opposed to quads. Also, the eerily silent A340 cabin gives me the creeps... I tend to take comfort if I can hear a good hum from the engines, dont know why that is.

Heck, I dont really care what they use, I'd just be happy to see MSY finally reestablish nonstop transatlantics on a reputable carrier.


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2274 times:

Too much of a hum is not always a good thing. One could think the engine may be running at too high of a power which isn't dangerous.

It doesn't matter whether the plane I'm on has 2, 3, or 4 engines. In terms of extra safety, of course 4 engines are safer than 2 engines.

As for preference, it doesn't matter to me.

I assume you like the Concorde because of your name. The Concorde has 4 engines.  Smile



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2260 times:

of course 4 engines are safer than 2 engines.

Let's hear it for anecdotal statements! I'm guessing you didnt fair well in statistics, correct?  Big grin

I assume you like the Concorde because of your name. The Concorde has 4 engines

I assume you like BA, because of your name. Ever known that BA operates Concorde almost completely to ETOPS standards because of its twinjet-like flight characteristics as well as the proximity of its engines (which has been known to cause its own share of problems, especially during uncontained failures)? Lowers their insurance, keeps pilots happy, etc...


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Lets have a big round of applause for ETOPS.... making our quads safer.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

N


User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6564 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

Apparently JetBlue will share gate C3 with Frontier. C1 (former Vanguard gate) is used by United to overnight an aircraft as well as Intl. charters, and C5 is Taca's gate.

Concordeboy, I would LOVE to see MSY get a Transatlantic flight, and I think an airline like LH could make it work, thanks to the tons of connections from FRA, and the booming tourist and cruise ship market in New Orleans. I think a twice-weekly ot thrice-weekly Airbus 330/340 nonstop would do great.

Steve in MSY


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2231 times:

I'd personally rather see AF send one of their A332s or even their soon-to-be-defunct 763ERs over here..... but not gonna happen any time soon. Aside from Star's current UA woes and the dread of having to ride a @#$%! A340, I'd love to see Lufty here as well!  Big grin

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2222 times:

Let's hear it for anecdotal statements! I'm guessing you didnt fair well in statistics, correct?

I'm sorry, but you just can't deny this fact. It should be commen sense and should not be argued. An A340 even with it's weak little engines can stay up in the air with 1 engine operating. That's losing 3 of it's 4 engines. On the A330, it can only lose 1 engine and still stay in the air.

Losing 3 engines or losing 1 engine? This shouldn't be a hard concept.

I am not in ANY way saying twin engined aircraft are unsafe. I fly on the 777 more than any other aircraft now when it comes to transatlantic crossings and I absolutely love that aircraft. Infact, if you check my profile. It's my favorite modern airliner. Turbofan engines advanced greatly over the years and have become extremely reliable that twin-engined aircraft like the 777 are extremely safe.

However, you cannot deny that having more than 2 engines is safer. Even me, a 777 lover doesn't deny this fact because it's the truth. Life is a risk, and if an accident is going to happen, it's going to happen. Which is why it doesn't matter whether I fly a 777 or a 747. They are all safe aircraft. However when something does go wrong, you cannot deny the fact that having an extra 2 engines is better.

It's simple logic. Anyone can see that.

Ever known that BA operates Concorde almost completely to ETOPS standards because of its twinjet-like flight characteristics as well as the proximity of its engines (which has been known to cause its own share of problems, especially during uncontained failures)? Lowers their insurance, keeps pilots happy, etc...

Yes I know that, however my point being was that it's a 4-engined aircraft.

Lets have a big round of applause for ETOPS.... making our quads safer.

ETOPs has nothing to do with 4-engined aircraft with the exception of the Concorde.

ETOPs stand for Extended Twin Operations and determines how long a twin engine aircraft can fly over a body of water with 1 engine.

Aircraft that recieve 180 minute ETOPs can operate 180 minutes away from land. Many times ETOPs ends up making certain ocean flights longer than they could be if they are operated on a 4-engine aircraft since ETOPs doesn't apply to them.

This especially affects Asia flights which is why the 747 is still a popular aircraft for Transpacific crossings. Also as I'm sure you know, Asian flights are very high density which is another reason the 747 is popular for Asian flights. But that's besides the point.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineRick767 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 2662 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

This kind of thing crops up here every once in a while. 4 engines safer than 2 etc... load of rubbish.

"Aircraft that recieve 180 minute ETOPs can operate 180 minutes away from land"

"can fly over a body of water with 1 engine"


Must disagree with you on both of these counts. ETOPS has nothing to do with water and land, just suitable airports. We must fly ETOPS on the 767 down through Africa at night (when most airports close). There is no water involved here - just a lack of suitable airport availability.

Having 2 extra engines is not safer IMO. Twice as likely that something nasty will happen to them for one. A twin can fly fine one 1 engine, 3 hours from an airport at single engine cruise speed.

Ask yourself the question "why do multiple engine failures occur?". Two reasons really - fuel starvation / contamination and flight into volcanic ash. Unfortunately in either of these circumstances on your 747 / A340 all four engines will fail (and they have done in the past too!).

So you're no safer in a quad than a twin are you?



I used to love the smell of Jet-A in the morning...
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2204 times:

I tend to take comfort if I can hear a good hum from the engines, dont know why that is.

Well then, you'd hate the front rows of the 717-200. You can only hear the engine expel a whisper, but you ain't gonna get no hum. Maybe a short vibration or 2, but that is it. (Which is why I sit in the back)


User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

Sorry, guys, been out of pocket for a couple of days (gone from work, family matters). Here are some comments regarding the above:

1) CO's move to concourse D and the DL ticket lobby occurs overnight tonight, I believe. It's one of those 'last plane in, move computers, planes, everything during the night, restart everything from new area in morning' deals.

2) JetBlue is now loading at gate C3, with Frontier. Ticket counter to stay in DL's lobby for now. Hadn't heard the news about the 319's starting here. Good for us, now my 4-year old daughter can add more tail pictures to her Frontier montage in herroom.

3) All counters closest to the front doors are out, or coming out to make more room for the EDS machines which will be here imminently.

4) As far LH, I haven't heard anything new, as for me, just bring something in, I don't care if it's a twin or a quad.

5) Ultimate plan is for Southwest occupy all of A and B. But more gates are needed on D to accomodate US and NW (gates that need to be added on to D).

Tom in NO (at MSY)



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2200 times:

ETOPs has nothing to do with 4-engined aircraft with the exception of the Concorde.

BA, I disagree. You may be correct by matter of regulation, but not necessarily by policy.

More and more engines used on quads are developed to stringent ETOPS requirements, and more and more airlines are maintaining their quads with ETOPS procedures as well.

Many of the redundant systems necessary for ETOPS are being ordered as options by airlines for their quads as well.

This gives quads an advantage over their twin-engined siblings once again. Hence my comment... ETOPS, making our quads safer.

And others- please, we had this statistical debate not too long ago. Mathematically, a quad is safer than a twin given similar maintenance policy. There's nothing anyone can say or do to debate that. Whether is true in practicality or not, doesn't matter much.

Move on.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

I'm sorry, but you just can't deny this fact.
Considering that it's not an actual fact, I can very easily do so  Big grin


An A340 even with it's weak little engines can stay up in the air with 1 engine operating
At empty weight+fuel and with 0% deration, it might... but not with anythign remotely resembling a payload typical of an intercontinental operation. A340s dont even have to be certified to take off nor fly at anything less than 75% power!


However when something does go wrong, you cannot deny the fact that having an extra 2 engines is better.
Perhaps you should research the proper diction of the word "fact"  Laugh out loud.
From an mechanical perspective, your statement has somewhat of an arguementative value. From a non-operational point of view.... tell me this: in the event of a hijacking (a very REAL reality now), a fuel loss, an electrical failure, a medical emergency, the smell of smoke, etc; would you rather be within 2-3hr diversion distance, or have 2 engines for "safety"? Just wondering  Big grin


ETOPs stand for Extended Twin Operations and determines how long a twin engine aircraft can fly over a body of water with 1 engine.
Completely inaccurate assessment: ETOPS as an acronym stands for "Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards" and its criteria for certification is not related in any way whatsoever to whether or not an aircraft is equipped to operate over water.


ETOPs has nothing to do with 4-engined aircraft with the exception of the Concorde
wrong again. ETOPS officially has nothing to do with Concorde, just that those aircrafts' operators have chosen to fly them to most of the standards dictated by ETOPS on scheduled routes.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

Everyone seems to be in a bad mood today. Little more confrontational than usual  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Relax everyone. Its a forum, its fun. We should all love each other, or some such shit.

N


User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6564 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2153 times:

Tom, CO and Delta will both operate out of only 4 gates on D? How are they going to swing that? I think DL has about 16 flights and CO has 15 I believe...31 flights for 4 gates seems like a lot for most airlines (except Southwest), especially since DL has all the gates occupied in the morning. Very interesting!

User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3013 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Please stop the off-topic posts about twins versus quads. It's tired and it's been hashed on this board many times. I do wish the mods would delete it.

BOT: (back on topic)

It's interesting to see that Delta flies so many 767's into MSY! Who is the largest carrier by terms of pax at MSY? I would guess it's Delta or Southwest. Anyone?



Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9628 posts, RR: 68
Reply 18, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2148 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

are there any photo spots @ MSY? Looks like I will be there beginning of Feb.

Royal


User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6564 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2143 times:

Southwest has the lead in terms of total number of passengers thanks to their 60 flights a day...Delta and Continental always fight for the second spot..I think Delta is number 2 currently.

All the 767's I've ever flown on into/out of MSY have been packed to the gills, except for the 767-400 which was a sub for a 762...not totally full.





User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2097 times:

are there any photo spots @ MSY? Looks like I will be there beginning of Feb.

Yes, by the Airline Adult Book store which is only a few dozen yards away from the threshhold of Rwy19, great spot.


Delta and Continental always fight for the second spot..I think Delta is number 2 currently.

Delta has, and has maintained, a significant lead over Continental for years.


User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 32
Reply 21, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

Some more comments from an MSY employee:

1) DL has four gates now on the south side of D with the addition of a new jetway at gate D-2. CO will have the three gates on the C side of D.

2) Southwest has been #1 for some time now in terms of both pax and movements. DL is #2, CO #3, although with the acquistion of TW, AA has moved up quite a bit.

3) Photo spots:
a) the above-mentioned photo spot is OK, but is better later in the day. I work on the airfield, so I'm more flexible in that area.
b) the parking garage is good for US and DL. A seven-floor garage addition is under construction, it should have some decent views.
c) parking lot neat the perishables/customs building on the south side of the airport is good, but the police will likely find you there.

4) Keep the twins/quads debate somewhere else, please. We haven't seen an Airbus larger than a 320 in a couple of years, so anything new is welcome down here.

Tom in NO (at MSY)



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6564 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1995 times:

One more question....

If Delta added a new jetway on D2, wouldn't that give them 3 total? I did see on the flymsy site that they have 2, 4, 6, and 8...do all 4 gates have jetways?


User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24928 posts, RR: 56
Reply 23, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1979 times:

Why do at American Airport, Airlines have assigned gates?
In the UK and Europe, airlines will go to any gate at the terminal they op to, thats free!  Big thumbs up



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

Why do at American Airport, Airlines have assigned gates?
In the UK and Europe, airlines will go to any gate at the terminal they op to, thats free!


Because the majority of non-fortress hub USA airports are geared primarily toward domestic flights by a small number of different scheduled carriers; who offer multiple frequencies to the same small number of destinations.

The fortress hubs often share similar characteristics, but typically include a designated concourse/terminal with multiple-use capability, usually the international arrival facilities. Prime examples: ATL, ORD, SFO, LAX, etc.

The euro-superhubs and Asian gateways often handle scores of different foreign airlines, many of whom have but a single daily/weekly frequency. They're more designed to cater toward such a market.


User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 32
Reply 25, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

Steven:

DL has single jetways at D2 and D4, and two jetways at D6, for a total of 4.  Smile

Tom in NO (at MSY)



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Airport For New Orleans MSY? posted Wed May 18 2005 15:07:47 by Squirrel83
More Lagos Flights For Virgin? posted Wed Mar 30 2005 08:50:07 by ETStar
Why All The Comair Flights To New Orleans Lately? posted Mon Oct 21 2002 06:47:42 by MSYtristar
More Airbus Deliveries For Finnair posted Fri Jan 5 2001 14:37:06 by The Ticketor
More Airlines And Flights For CVT posted Sun Oct 15 2006 13:15:15 by Humberside
AirTran Adds More New Orleans Service posted Sun Jul 9 2006 03:41:59 by MSYtristar
More One Demolition For The New York History posted Wed Nov 30 2005 17:39:47 by AwysBSB
New Orleans Refugee Flights posted Fri Sep 2 2005 05:08:57 by Spinkid
New Intl. Flights For Brazilian Airlines posted Wed Aug 24 2005 23:57:22 by PPVRA
FedEx: More New Orleans Flying posted Wed May 25 2005 02:18:42 by MSYtristar