Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PIA 743 At JFK Instead Of 74M On Wed 18th?  
User currently offlineBigmo747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 306 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1943 times:

I just saw on trackaflight.com that PK721/PK 722 on 12/18/2003 is a 743. This flight is the one weekly flight from NY to KHI without a stop in Lahore or Islamabad, however it is always most definately operated by a 742 mixed passenger/freighter aircraft. I would think that with the one grounded 743 at LHR, PK wouldn't have the flexibility to put another 743 on the usual 74M route. Anybody know why the switch??



7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGARUDAROD From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1517 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1929 times:



Just a guess, but with a heavy travel period, they need the
extra capacity of the B743?



Cargo doesn't whine, moan, or complain
User currently offlineBigmo747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

Initially i thought the same thing, but then again most of PIA's flights are oversold to Lahore, which according to many is a great source of passenger revenue for the airline. Karachi is a better source of Cargo revenue then the other cities in Pakistan. They uplift a decent amount of cargo from JFK on a weekly basis. People travelling to Lahore dislike connecting thru Karachi when flights are available to Lahore directly. In worst case scenarios they would opt for the ISB flights since ISB is a lot closer to LHE then is KHI.

I was thinking more on the lines of a technical problem with either of the 74M's.

Who knows?? maybe ur right--PIA is great with their variations of aircraft for whatever reasons.



User currently offlineGF-A330 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

Hi

Bigmo747

I saw the 743 depart today at MAN for New York (PK721). I thought it was unusual that the 74M was not operating on this flight.

I presume it would either be extra capacity needed or the 747-300 stuck at LHR (AP-BFV). Can anyone confirm whether the 743 at LHR has been moved ?

Could be the xmas, new year rush that people are flying back home. Will let you know, once I gather more details.

Regards
GF-A330

http://www.geocities.com/fly_pia/


User currently offlineGF-A330 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1899 times:

More info regarding the 747-300 nose gear problem at LHR.....

On Saturday 7th of December a Pia 747-300 Aircraft suffered a blown trye whilst taxiing to its departure runway. The aircraft returned to the gate, and the pasenengers were allocated to three 5 hotels around Heathrow Airport. The flight finally left using an inbound aircraft from Islamabad, on Monday morning at 12.30


User currently offlineGF-A330 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1895 times:

According to the PIA website, todays two London Heathrow flights:

PK 787 and PK 788 were both operated by the 74M. So this explains the a/c change. The 743 was swapped for one of the LHR flights.

Extra cargo consignments maybe, or as I said earlier additional capacity required for the MAN-JFK flight.



User currently offlineBigmo747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

GF-A330,

PK787 and PK788 utilize the same aircraft. PK787 is the inbound from KHI into LHR and PK788 is the return flight.

My younger sister is leaving on PK724 for KHI tomorrow night and i just hope she doesn't get a 74M as she is looking forward to the PTV's in coach on the 743. It's pretty boring travelling for 20 odd hours without a PTV.

I checked on PK's website and so far PK723/724 is still a 743. Let's just keep our fingers crossed.

regards


User currently offlineThud From Pakistan, joined Aug 2000, 204 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

Bigmo747,
I would advise your sister to take ample reading material as tea entertainment is not that interesting to say the least.

I presume she will be traveling on the upper deck. Much better service and much quieter


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pax Returning Home, Ends Up At MHT Instead Of MAN posted Thu Jun 8 2006 03:34:22 by Kearnet
PIA Emergency At JFK Yesterday? posted Mon Feb 14 2005 22:49:40 by Star_world
SAA A342/A343's To JFK Instead Of A346's posted Fri Jan 2 2004 11:01:43 by SAA201
WDL Instead Of FAT On CGN-ZRH posted Wed Sep 18 2002 19:23:40 by 717fan
Spotting At JFK (saw Some Of You On Dwings) posted Fri Dec 10 2004 23:48:22 by Nycfuturepilot
Pics Of AA MD-80 Gear-up Landing At JFK On posted Tue Sep 9 2003 19:00:00 by PSU.DTW.SCE
PIA 743 Grounded At LHR On Stand R34 posted Mon Dec 9 2002 23:35:11 by Leezyjet
Evergreen Supertanker At JFK On 11/16/06 posted Fri Nov 17 2006 17:53:14 by FlyDeltaJets
Any Signs Of Pan Am Left At JFK? posted Tue Aug 8 2006 06:05:56 by MSYtristar
Will B6 Take Advantage Of DL Cuts At JFK? posted Tue Feb 28 2006 17:42:28 by JFKLGANYC