United777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2517 times:
Do you ever think what Boeing would be without the 777 series aircraft. Where do you think Boeing would have been in the 90's if they just went ahead with another model of the 767 series like the 767-400. The 777 was made because airlines wanted a aircraft between the 747-400 and 767-300. If Boeing just came out with a stretched 767 for that do you think it would have as popular as the 777-200 /-300?
Thadocta From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 397 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2513 times:
Hard to say - remember that the 777 was developed based on airline requirements, yet one of the airlines which was instrumental in evolving the requirements - Qantas - did not go on to purchase any.
I do not think the 764 would have markedly increased sales if the 777 did not happen - something *MUCH* larger was needed, and the orders probably would have gone to Airbus, probably for the A330 - who knows, in the absence of an aircraft which suits the mission like the 777 does, perhaps Airbus would have evolved their offerings a bit more than they have.
AA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5947 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2435 times:
IF Boeing had not built the 777, McDonnell Douglas would still be around cranking out MD-11s and MD-12s as fast as they could. And, hopefully, they would have gone ahead with the MD-11-50.... and addressed the existing MD-11-30's range and economy... concerns, shall I say.
PW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2594 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (12 years 20 hours ago) and read 2374 times:
Hmmm. No 777?? Lets see.
The evolved MD-11 and MD-12 would rule the world like the 777 does now;
The world would have never seen 180 min ETOPS;
MDC would have taken over Boeing and closed down by now the 757/767;
Everett would be rolling out MD11/12s;
The 744 line would be closed by now, since the MD11/12 [and -F] would have taken over;
A380 would start revenue service next month with BA;
Longbeach would be rolling out an MD90/95 every single working day;
Aviation experts would be arguing with each other when Renton would be producing the last 737;
Even the moving assembly line couldn't save the 737;
The number of MD narrowbodies in Americans fleet would be beyond any imagination [500+];
Only Airbus would be producing big twins;
Thus Continental would be 100% Airbus;
The world would have never seen 115.000 lbs of thrust [from a single turbofan];
Oh yeah, and Alan Mulaly would have been asked to run United Airlines. . . .
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
ScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 17 hours ago) and read 2305 times:
What are you talking about with A370?? Do you think even need built new Airbus A370 or maybe not? I am serious about something was goes on for next generation of the new Airbus jet. Anyone please tell me what is going on this posted for me, please? Thanks!!
Rickb From United Kingdom, joined May 2003, 243 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2080 times:
Whilst the 777 is a great aircraft from an economic point of view - with excellent range/payload capability I am at a loss as to why any passengers would rate it highly (I try and avoid it it if possible although I have still accumulated about 50 flights on one). The cabin layout in both economy (2-5-2 or 3-3-3 or even 3-4-3) and business class (2-3-2 or 2-4-2) means from a passenger point of view its less comfortable than a 744 or an A330/340. The 744 offers a much better cabin with higher ceilings giving the impression of much more space - It also in my opinion has a much smoother ride than 777.
The 777 may be a wonderful aircraft from an airline point of view (i.e. economy) but from a passenger comfort point of view - the 744 whoops it.
Srbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2062 times:
If Boeing had not built the 777, they probably would have developed a 747-400SP, essentially a 747SP-NG. A shorter-bodied version of the 747-400 that would have seated a max of 300 pax, and incorporating the technological advances into the old SP design. They would have have two versions of it, the 400SP would have a slightly lesser range than the 747-400, and the 400SP-ER, which would have been the true successor to the original 747SP. I think that the customers that would have bought it would have been current customers of the 747-400, like BA, United, NWA, Korean, and JAL. Airlines like Delta, Continental, and AA probably would have gone with MDD's widebodies instead of adding the 747-400SP. MDD would have by then created the best version of the MD-11, with the range problems fixed (and also able to modify the earlier MD-11s to the new standard), and the MD-12 would have been the launch aircraft for the GE-90 engine, as MDD decided to make it twin-engined in order to compete against the A330.
AvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2478 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (11 years 12 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2025 times:
Without the 777, Boeing would be in way deeper straits than they already are. It and the 737NG are the only really decent sellers in their product line, though the 717 hasn't been bad as of late. The 747 & 767 hang on but aren't fluorishing and the 757 has been mired in a serious sales drought. Boeing should be thankful it had the foresight back in 1990 to go with an all-new design, rather than an enlarged 767. Hopefully, it will have the same foresight to forge ahead with the new Super-Efficient medium-sized transport, rather than just continuing to tweak the 757 & 767 in hopes of a few more orders.
Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1922 times:
I too think that the 777 is a perfect aircraft except that i do not like the seating arrangement in economy. same for business although we have SQ's generous 2-2-2 but other airlines seem to have 2-3-2....
When it comes to abreast arrangements, I would say the 767 and the A330/340 is the best, especially the 767..
The Coachman From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 1431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1905 times:
Dare I say it, UA wouldn't have last this long. Without the B777, UA would have kept ordering B747-400's and it would have gone under at least a year ago. The superior economics of the B777 on long-thin routes have kept it alive IMO.
Boeing would be in deep dung without the B777. The A340 would have been ordered in massive quantities without any fear (whether justified or not) of ETOPS regulations.
RIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1792 times:
Much more 340s (and, may be, more 330s), quite likely MDD still alive with MD11s and derivatives.
747 more comfortable than 777? Probably, as it is simply larger (wider and "less circular"). But this is the interior of 777 (and 764) that makes it so special and outstanding - feeling like you are not inside it! You may not notice it - until you fly again on 747 or MD11 or 330/340 or older 767 soon after you were on 777/764...
LH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 19, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1736 times:
I don't think McDonnell Douglas would be around still. The main reason Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas was because of MDC's military contracts. In the grand scheme of things, the commercial aspect of MDC's business was not close to what they made in military deals, so Boeing may just have gone ahead with that deal, 777 or no 777. Just look at how fast they closed down the MD-11 and MD-80/90 lines. They probably would have shut down the MD-95 (717) line too, if that aircraft wasn't showing as much promise as it did when the deal went through.
I don't think the MD-11s sales would have increased that dramatically, because, as beautiful a plane she is, she still had drastic range problems, and I'm sure a lot of the orders would have gone to the A340 and A330. I think if Boeing hadn't built the 777 then, they would have eventually. Or they'd be facing a dark future of becoming a largely narrow-body manufacturer. The 737 and 757 lines would continue to be strong, the 764 probably would have seen increased sales, especially from smaller carriers who bought the 777, like Air Europe and maybe Lauda, or something along those lines.
It would have been different to say the least.
« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry