Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Taxpayers money  
User currently offlineDL757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Why does't the US charge for IFR flights, IFR approaches and landing fees like they do in Europe. It's great when your a pilot but if not it's your taxpayers money that is pumped into it. Also for weather stations etc. I'd would like to see them put it in eductation so that the US can stay ahead in this world.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Because the government is not going to control the industry as the do in Europe.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineDL757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Could you be a bit more specific, CX747 ? This is not about control, it's about how much something costs and how much you charge for it. It's called subsidizing (like Airbus remember ?)

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Thats right and they are not going to subsidize the aerospace industry.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineSpeedbird From Australia, joined May 2004, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Landing and useage fees depend on the weight of the aircraft.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29690 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 594 times:

The FAA and its tower operations are funded by fuel taxes. This way the more you fly the more you contribute to the mantaince of the system.

Charging for each service rendered is a idea that will either kill pilots or general aviation.

If you charge for filing a flight plane then there will be a number of pilots (Me Included) who rather then filing a flight plan with flight service will plan out a flight and then leave the plan with a friend who if you don't get back in time would then call in for help locating you. A lot of people I know who fly into hunt do this because it isn't unusual for a trip to take a couple hours or days longer then usual and flight plans work strictly with the clock. You of course are going to have more guys who arn't even going to leave a plan with anybody at all. Either way not as many people are going to be filing so either the FAA with have to raise the price (in effect forcing more people not to file) or you are going to have to make it mandatory.

Ditto for IFR clearences. If you charge for them you will have more people flying MVFR, Which can be done safely but not by somebody who doesn't do in regularly or not flying at all in. Either way they are going to be taking the cheeper way and you are going to increase the accident rate.

Don't belive all of this stuff that is coming out of captial hill about how the airways system is on the verg of colapse. With the current fuel taxes that are in place the trust fund the access money goes into is worth right now 8.1 billion. At least that is the number I got this off ABCnews the other night. Airlines want to lower their fuel taxes so they are pushing this idea that general avaition is getting their services for free. But if you think about it a general avation pilot is paying his fuel taxes entirely out of his pocket, a airline is splitting the cost of it's taxes amoung the twenty,hundred or four hundred people in the back of the airplane. With the current system everybody who flies is paying their share.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (15 years 2 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 594 times:

Forget that US/Europe different way of doing things and think on this:

When you park your car in a parking place, very often you have to pay, right?

When an aircraft lands on an airport, it's using the airport ground work and services. This means costs to the airport. So, it's fair to charge that fees to airlines.

Mirage, Faro, Portugal


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UK Taxpayers Make Money Off Airbus posted Tue Nov 12 2002 01:43:15 by Trex8
YX Gets More Money From Republic. Skywest Out posted Mon Jun 8 2009 15:41:57 by TVNWZ
Is Your Airport Receiving Stimulus Money? posted Thu Apr 30 2009 12:10:47 by ThegreatRDU
Problem Solved: How Gulf Airlines Make Money... posted Thu Mar 19 2009 11:27:00 by Kleinsim
Earning Money By Cleaning Aircraft! Help? posted Sun Mar 15 2009 01:59:33 by Virginblue4
Citigroup Used Bailout Money On $50 Mil Jet. posted Mon Jan 26 2009 13:45:52 by FXramper
Is CO Actually Making Money Off Of Me? posted Sat Nov 29 2008 18:55:03 by Lincoln
Another Money Making Scheme For Ryanair! posted Sun Aug 31 2008 03:42:17 by Cumulus
CO Charging Money For Voucher Redemption?! posted Mon Aug 18 2008 01:57:00 by Ushermittwoch
Air Namibia F/A Attempts To Extort Money From PAX posted Tue Aug 12 2008 20:25:51 by MHTripple7