Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Prefer Jet Or Turboprop In Shorthaul?  
User currently offlineWing From Turkey, joined Oct 2000, 1583 posts, RR: 23
Posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1595 times:

I have witnessed more than one occasion that people feel more safe if they fly with a jet engined aircraft rather than a turboprop airplane.When you have to fly short haul and if you had a chance to choose(lets say there is a flight departing now with a turboprop airplane and another one in one hour with a jet to your destination)which one would you prefer?


follow me on my facebook page" captain wing's journey log"
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSeiple From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1587 times:

The flight most convenient for me would be my choice, especially if it offers a shorter layover. Sitting around in airports in between flights isn't my idea of fun.

User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1582 times:

Gimme the 'prop!

joe


User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1579 times:

I always prefere a jet because it is more comfortable (and not that loud) but I also like it to fly on props, in the last year I flew a lot with the ATR 42 and with the ATR 72.

Patrick


User currently offlineCMK10 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1556 times:

In my experiance with short haul transports (Saab-340, Shorts-360, ATR-42 ERJ-140, ERJ-145). Ill take the Saab. But this is not indicitive of me always taking props, Ive just had the best experiances with the Saab.
DC-10's Forever



"Traveling light is the only way to fly" - Eric Clapton
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1540 times:

I havent had much experience with either (only regional flights were on Dash-8, J-31, Do-328, and Bae-146) but as long as it gets me where Im going on schedule, I dont think I would care too much...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1511 times:

Given that most regional jets and props have the same level of comfort, it doesn't matter to me at all. I think the props are more fun to fly in - they give that "old world" feel of lots of noise on start-up, taxy and take-off. I wouldn't want to deal with that for more than about 30 minutes, though.

User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6383 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1487 times:

The staement "that people feel more safe if they fly with a jet engined aircraft rather than a turboprop airplane" is really quite funny. Not that your statement was funny Wing, I've seen it also. My laugh comes from pointing out that the only real difference is that on one the fan is enclosed.

Now for my preference. Do.328-300 over Saab 340, DHC-8 over CRJ/ERJ, F.27 over anything. I will always choose high wing and don't care if the fan is shrouded or not.



it's getting harder not to tell people they are really odd if they think an airplan can be sexy.
User currently offlineSpence From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

Depends on which model of Saab340. The "A" model is poor, the "B" model is okay, and the B+ is quite comfortable and quiet.

Over all, I'll take any Dash-8 model because the engine RPM is lower thus less vibration.

Spence


User currently offlineFlyboy36y From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3039 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

I kinda like Saabs and ATRs. I wanna take them while I can.

User currently offlinePortcolumbus From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1616 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

Gotta love props, just anything but a Shuttle America Saab. Never again.

User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1469 times:

Can't really say because i've never flown on a turboprop before. But given a choice of say a CRJ or a Saab 340 i'd take the CRJ. Jets are faster, fly higher, quieter and smoother to fly in. Having said that i would like to fly on a turboprop just for the experience.

User currently offlineDouglas DC-9 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 303 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

I'd take a Beechcraft 1900D for a prop, and an Dornier/Fairchild 328JET for an "express" or shorthaul flight.

Thanks Much,
DC-9-32


User currently offlineAApilot2b From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 578 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1452 times:

I'll take the prop! Especially if its leaving now. I've flown in both regional jets and turbo props and to be honest, my most comfortable experience of them all was in an ASA, ATR-72. There was more leg room and cabin space in that aircraft than the CRJ or ERJ. My CRJ flights were horrible (my greatest dislike being the window at elbow level. I've read that Bombardier fixed this issue with the CRJ, but so far my times in those aircraft were not very pleaseant at all.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gregg Stansbery



User currently offlineStrickerje From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 723 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

I'd take the prop just for variety since I see and fly on RJ's often (namely CRJ's). I was on a turboprop for the first time in over 10 years just a few weeks ago - American Eagle Saab 340, SAN-LAX. My first flight ever, back in 1992, included a leg on a Comair Saab 340, CVG-YYZ, and I wanted to fly on one again - and I even made sure I got the same seat!

User currently offlineWing From Turkey, joined Oct 2000, 1583 posts, RR: 23
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

Actually while I was writing this post I was also thinking that this is not quite right place to ask such question.Because in a.net forums people are knowledgable or eager to learn something about aviation so they can think better than average people on the steet.Taking the a.netters a side most people doesn't have a clue about the difference between turbopropeller and piston propeller.I 've witnessed people in the waiting lounges talking about the plane's paint was old and would that be an unsafe situation.Or more interestingly even some of my friends who know I am an airline pilot asks me "we flew 3 times with A Airline it was not a bumpy flight but last week we flew B Airline and it was a turbulant flight why is it? Does A airlines has better pilots than B airline?"So I guess its normal that non enthusiasts can make such comments and its also normal that people who doesn't fly often can be stressed little more than frequent flyers.


follow me on my facebook page" captain wing's journey log"
User currently offlineERJ135 From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 691 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1425 times:

Safety is not really an issue for me when selecting a flight unless it's with an airline with a really poor record.
If the jet was an ERJ I'd go with that, but otherwise I'd take the most convenient option or earliest arrival.



I remember when the DC-3 was new!
User currently offlineLPL From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1055 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

I've flown the A330 from DUB to SNN and the ATP from LPL to IOM. Comparing these two, I prefer the A330 because it's quieter and less bumpy. Next year i'm hoping to go on an ERJ or a 717.

User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1408 times:

ARJ, Dash 8, F50, ATR, Do 328, CRJ - in that order. In three weeks, I´ll get a ride on the world´s first regional jet - watch out for my trip report to see how she compares to the others.

(Though I guess it would be rather difficult to find a route on which a CRJ and a Yak 40 are direct competitors  Smile/happy/getting dizzy )

Daniel Smile


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA To SSA And/or REC In '08 posted Sat Apr 21 2007 18:12:07 by MAH4546
BKK, HKG, And/or SIN In Delta's Future? 777LR's? posted Thu Apr 19 2007 18:07:32 by Rwy04LGA
Jet Or Prop posted Sun Feb 11 2007 04:37:43 by Flyboyseven
Jet Engine Noise In Cold Temperatures? posted Sun Feb 4 2007 23:50:16 by Falstaff
PIA 737 Or A310 In Sharm El Sheikh posted Tue Jan 23 2007 17:40:08 by 777way
Report: AZ Deal With AF Or CA In The Works. posted Sun Oct 29 2006 17:08:35 by Nycfly75
Antonovs Or Illyushins In Reg. Pax Service Today. posted Wed Oct 4 2006 04:08:09 by Mirrodie
Jet Star A320 In AMS. posted Wed Aug 30 2006 08:31:51 by Mptpa
Delta Jet Gets Stuck In Mississippi Mud. posted Fri Aug 11 2006 11:05:08 by Aeroplan73
"Targa Jet 246"? In NY OCA Now. Any Ideas? posted Wed May 31 2006 01:29:59 by RobK