Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F-Series Fighter Planes?  
User currently offlinePoadrim From Norway, joined Oct 2008, 174 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 32767 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi,

I have done a quick Goggle search and didn't come up with any good answer.
My question is why are there not following order? i.ex:

F-10
F-11
F-12
F-13
F-14 Tomcat
F-15 Eagle
F-16 Viper
F-17
F-18 Hornet
F-19
F-20
F-21
F-22 Raptor

Why jump over F-10/11/12/12/17/19/20/21


Good judgment comes from experience. Good experience comes from someone else's bad judgment.
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTGIF From Sweden, joined Apr 2008, 277 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Wikipedia might help (though handle with care...  Smile) when Google doesn't:

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but here's a start:
F-10
F-11
YF-12 - would have been named F-12 if introduced?
YF-17 - Lost to F-16
F-19 has never been used AFAIK
F-20 - Only 5 built.

Does not cover your whole list but it's perhaps a start..


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2124 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

They don't get skipped, generally speaking. The F-10 was a later version of the F-3D Skynight. The F-11 was the Grumman F-11F-1 Tiger. Then there's the Lockheed YF-12, an interceptor version of the A-12 Blackbird. I don't know what the F-13 was. The F-17 slot was given to the Northrop YF-17, a competitor to the F-16 for the light fighter role in the air force and the precurssor to the McDonnell Douglas F-18 Hornet. The F-19 was widely believed to have been the stealth fighter (F-117) back in the day, and the Air Force may have just let that misconception stay. The F-20 was the Northrop F-20 Tigershark... a very advanced and capable version of the F-5 perhaps for the Air Force but also for export. Then there is the F-21 Kfir, an Isreali Aircraft Industries version of the Mirage, which the Navy and Marines used for dissimiliar air to air combat training (think Top Gun) for a few years.

Some gaps are just planes that never made it into production.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlinePoadrim From Norway, joined Oct 2008, 174 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 32767 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Alright, thanks alot mates!


Good judgment comes from experience. Good experience comes from someone else's bad judgment.
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Prior to 1962 the Navy had a system of identifying their aircraft and the Air Force had a different system. In October 1962 the Defense Department revised the numbing system for all military fighters. The last fighter aircraft using the Air Force system was the F-111. Several then current Navy aircraft were re-identenfied using the new system. Here are the F series aircraft from F-1 through F-11. The Lockheed YF-12A was the first aircraft built using the combined numbering system.

North American F-1E previously known as FJ-4 Fury
McDonnell F-II Airways (Italy)">2D previously known as F2H-4 Banshee
McDonnell F-3C previously known as F3H-2N Demon
McDonnell F-4E previously known as F-110 Phantom II
Northrop F-5A previously known as N156F Freedom Fighter
Douglas F-6A previously known as F4D-1 Skyray
Convair YF-7A previously known as YF2Y-1 Sea Dart
Chance Vought F-8E previously known as F8U-2NE Crusader
Grumman F-9J previously known as F9F-8 Cougar
Douglas .F-10B previously known as F3D-2 Skyknight
Grumman F-11A previously known as F11F-1 Tiger


User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting 474218 (Reply 4):
McDonnell F-II Airways (Italy)">2D previously known as F2H-4 Banshee

Don't know what happen there, should read:

McDonnell F-2D previously known as F2H-4 Banshee


User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 years 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

What became the F-4C was originally known as the F-110A. F-4E never carried any kind of F-110 designation.


Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineAreopagus From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1374 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting 474218 (Reply 4):
McDonnell F-4E previously known as F-110 Phantom II

The F-110A was called Spectre, but when redesignated F-4C, was also redesignated Phantom II to match the Navy's name.


User currently offlineHunterson From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Based on simple memory, and also to keep things as simple as possible, I believe that this is how things went at the time ( ie. after 1962 ) :

F-1 Fury
F-2 Banshee
F-3 Demon
F-4 Phantom
F-5 Freedom Fighter ( and F-5E Tiger 2)
F-6 Skyray
F-7 Cutlass
F-8 Crusader
F-9 Panther/ Cougar
F-10 Skyknight
F-11 Tiger
F-12 ( YF-12 prototype, never went into service )
F-13 ( never used for obvious reasons )
F-14 Tomcat
F-15 Eagle ( and F-15E Strike Eagle )
F-16 Fighting Falcon
F-17 ( YF-17 prototype which lost to the YF-16 )
F-18 Hornet ( AF-18 and AF-18E Super Hornet )
F-19 ( reported as some "stealth" prototype which never entered production, or did it ? )
F-20 Tigershark ( upgraded F-5E Tiger which never entered service )
F-21 Kfir ( Israeli - modified Mirage-3 used for a while by aggressor squadrons )
F-22 Raptor
F-23 ( prototype Yf-23 which lost to YF-22 )
F-35 Lightning 2 ( aka JSF )


I hope I did not skip anything, but if I did, please let me know.


User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Hunterson (Reply 8):
I hope I did not skip anything, but if I did, please let me know.

Prefect, except for the F-7 was the Convair YF2Y-1 Sea Dart


User currently offlineHunterson From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Appreciate that, but what about the ( F-7 ) Cutlass ?

User currently offlineGsosbee From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 825 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Hunterson (Reply 8):
F-12 ( YF-12 prototype, never went into service )

Was this the A-12 or the F-12?

Also, somewhere in the numbering (coud be for the "R" series) were several black projects.


User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Hunterson (Reply 10):
Appreciate that, but what about the ( F-7 ) Cutlass ?

Didn't make the list, kept its Navy F7U-3 designation. The Cutlass was removed from service in 1957.

The interesting aircraft they included in the re-number was the F-7 (YF2Y-1 Sea Dart) only four (4) were ever built and the program was canceled in 1956?


User currently offlineHunterson From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Many thanks to ( 474218 ) for the interesting info. I certainly never thought before that the F-7 designation belonged to the Sea Dart which I always believed had kept its original Navy designation YF2Y, with the F7U Cutlass getting the F-7 mark instead. well, at least that is now corrected.


In reply to ( Gsosbee ), yes indeed it was A-12, which was the Lockheed designation of the original ( Skunk Works ) programme. It led first to the prototype YF-12 which was supposed to be developed into a high-performance all-weather long-range interceptor in conjunction with the XB-70 Valkyrie strategic bomber. The two programmes were cancelled, however, and the only remaining bit was that which eventually led to the SR-71 Blackbird. Essentially the same aircraft as the original A-12 / YF-12, but optimized as a strategic recce unarmed aircraft, which gave glorious service with the USAF for nearly 3 decades.


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4006 posts, RR: 18
Reply 14, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting 474218 (Reply 12):
The interesting aircraft they included in the re-number was the F-7 (YF2Y-1 Sea Dart) only four (4) were ever built and the program was canceled in 1956?

Correct, it got F-7 'for some inexplicable reason' according to a book by Robert F. Dorr.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1403 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 32767 times:

I remember having read somewhere that some of the Soviet types introduced for dissimilar combat training got a F- designation.
At least some examples of the MiG-15, MiG-17, MiG-19 and MiG-21 saw limited use.
This could explain some of the "missing links" (F-19? F-24 and so on)

Ciao

Stefano


User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2990 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (6 years 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Steman (Reply 15):
At least some examples of the MiG-15, MiG-17, MiG-19 and MiG-21 saw limited use.
This could explain some of the "missing links" (F-19? F-24 and so on)

These aircraft actually got F- designationa in the 1-teens range. Grey cells seem t remember MiG-21 as F-113 and MiG-23 as F-115....



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1403 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Spacepope (Reply 16):
These aircraft actually got F- designationa in the 1-teens range. Grey cells seem t remember MiG-21 as F-113 and MiG-23 as F-115....

True,
I think you´re right.
I remember that they got a F designation and now that you mention it, I think I remember they were in the F-1xx range

Ciao

Stefano


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2124 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting Gsosbee (Reply 11):
Was this the A-12 or the F-12?



Quoting Hunterson (Reply 13):
In reply to ( Gsosbee ), yes indeed it was A-12, which was the Lockheed designation of the original ( Skunk Works ) programme. It led first to the prototype YF-12 which was supposed to be developed into a high-performance all-weather long-range interceptor in conjunction with the XB-70 Valkyrie strategic bomber. The two programmes were cancelled, however, and the only remaining bit was that which eventually led to the SR-71 Blackbird. Essentially the same aircraft as the original A-12 / YF-12, but optimized as a strategic recce unarmed aircraft, which gave glorious service with the USAF for nearly 3 decades.

F-12 was a totally seperate beast from the A-12. The A-12 was a single seat spy plane used by the CIA operationally from around 1965-1968. The SR-71 was a 2 seat spy plane, longer and heavier and slower, used by the Air Force. The Air Force had a fly off between the A-12 and SR-71 and went with the SR, which also made the CIA's A-12's redundant and so that program did end that year. The YF-12 was a 2 seat interceptor version of the A-12 of which 3 were built but that program was cancelled as well. It had cut chines (they started below the cockpit instead of at the tip of the nose) so as to facilitate the radar nose and also had a very large ventral fin in between the engines to make up for the reduced stability, and which could fold up on the ground for clearance. While we are at it there was also the M-12, a 2 seat modified A-12 which carried a Mach 6 D-21 drone piggyback style.  Wink



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineHunterson From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

( Quoting Gsosbee )


Again, most of the above info is basically correct . However, I do not think anyone would describe the A-12 / YF-12 / SR-71 as "totally different".
They were essentially the same family , sharing the same basic design and shape, as well as very similar dimensions.
Certainly, each member of that family was optimized for a different mission, hence the slightly varying specific details as far as performance and equipment was concerned. the A-12 was indeed marginally faster than the SR-71 and YF-12 ( Mach 3.35 compared to Mach 3.21),and also could fly slightly higher ( 90000ft compared to 85000ft ). The main difference was of course in mission profile, where the A-12 was supposed to fly over the target, while the SR-71 was a "stand-off" Recce aircraft with side-looking radar and photo equipment. Also correct is the fact that the A-12 was a single-seater, while the YF-12 and SR-71 were both 2-seaters.
On the whole, though, the 3 aircraft were very much part of the same design project and shared the same name, Blackbird.


User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 18):
The Air Force had a fly off between the A-12 and SR-71 and went with the SR, which also made the CIA's A-12's redundant and so that program did end that year.

Could you provide more information on this "fly off between the A-12 and the SR-71" such as where and when did it took place, etc?


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2124 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting 474218 (Reply 20):
Could you provide more information on this "fly off between the A-12 and the SR-71" such as where and when did it took place, etc?

I recently found a website showing declassified CIA documents while Googling something else. I spent several hours delving thru some interesting stuff on the Blackbirds and their programs... all declassified. However the website doesn't allow you to copy n paste, nor when I found pages pertaining to your question would the url in the address bar for that page be helpful... it gives a message directing you with a link to the homepage.

So, this is the best I can do.

http://www.foia.cia.gov/search.asp

Type in COMPARISON OF SR-71 TO A-12 AIRCRAFT and then click on the result of the same name

Type in OXCART/SR-71 INFORMATION FOR EXCOM MEETING and click on result of same name.

Type in HISTORY OF THE OXCART PROGRAM and click the result of the same name. Amazing reading! This is a history of the A-12 Program by Kelly Johnson himself!!

and on the NEXT PAGE click on PHASEOUT.

These show there was a commission to compare the 2 and decide if they should coexist or make the other unnecassary, but somewhere along the line last week I had read the word "fly off" and perhaps by Kelly Johnson... and I know for sure because that wording surprised me even though I was aware it wasn't a 'fly off' as in our F-14/F-15 demo flights for the Shah of Iran back in the day, but an on-paper fly off of capabilities and survivabilities of plane vs plane.

[Edited 2008-12-10 16:26:54]


Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 32767 times:



Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 21):

Thanks for the references, while I had seen a couple of those reports before (reproductions, not the originals) it was great to read them in their original form. I even saw something mentioned in one of those documents that when I saw it on a blueprint about 40 years ago I was told to forget I ever saw it. But I suspect you will find the "fly off" was done on paper. Both programs (Oxcart and the SR-71) were enormously expensive and there was no way both were going to get funded once both were operational. Additionally keeping the Oxcart program as a black program was getting harder, even with the SR-71's being used as a cover.


User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting 474218 (Reply 4):
McDonnell F-4E previously known as F-110 Phantom II

While there was the Vought F-4U Corsair.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bob Groenendijk
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joey Collura



Quoting 474218 (Reply 4):
Convair YF-7A previously known as YF2Y-1 Sea Dart

..... there also were the LTV EA-7L, TA-7C and A-7E Corsair II.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alastair T. Gardiner - WorldAirImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alastair T. Gardiner - WorldAirImages


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Lofting



Did these lead to the F-8 Crusader?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Dunn
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rod Dermo



[Edited 2008-12-10 19:25:38]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2990 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (6 years 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Actually it's the other way around, the F-8 led to the A-7.

The Navy system was too confusing. The F-4U was also the FG-1 when manufactured by Goodyear...

And then there was the difference between the F4F, F4U, F4H (later F-110/F4), and F-4D Skyray...



The last of the famous international playboys
25 474218 : The other way around the F-8 [F8U-2] came before the A-7. That was the Navy numbering system not the USAF or combined Department of Defense numbering
26 Ptrjong : The F4U, F4G and F4H were the fourth naval fighters from the respective manufacturers (the McDonnell series: FH Phantom, F2H Banshee, F3H Demon, F4H
27 Spacepope : Actually, G is Goodyear. F is Grumman, so the Wildcat should be F4F.... Incorrect as well. If it were NA's 4th fighter it would be F4J. FJ= F1J, the
28 Post contains links and images 474218 : There were four (4) FJ different fighters they were not sub-types of the same aircraft: FJ-1 View Large View MediumPhoto © Steve Williams FJ-2 V
29 Ptrjong : That might be true, but you were in the process of explaining the old Navy designation system and the FJ designation says they are subtypes of the sa
30 Prebennorholm : Or never used because that number would have been assigned to the Tomcat very shortly after the ill fated Apollo 13 mission.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic F-Series Fighter Planes?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fighter Series De-ice/anti-ice Equp posted Tue Jun 5 2007 05:02:12 by Ssflyboy25
Croatian Fighter Tender Cancelled posted Mon Nov 17 2008 23:37:46 by TripleDelta
F-14:US Fighter Speed King posted Sat Nov 8 2008 22:18:21 by SCAT15F
Fighter/Bomber Roll-Rates posted Wed Oct 8 2008 03:46:51 by Blackbird
Korean-War Jet-Fighter Question posted Thu Sep 25 2008 11:10:05 by Blackbird
World War II Fighter Question posted Wed Sep 17 2008 13:00:11 by Blackbird
New Aussie Fighter Clubbed Like Baby Seal posted Wed Sep 10 2008 19:52:56 by VHECA
US Navy Fighter Nosegear Design posted Tue Sep 9 2008 22:17:22 by Blackbird
U.S.A.F Planes To Ecuador posted Tue Aug 12 2008 21:01:00 by Airportmanager
Did Finland Ever Have Its Own Jet Fighter? posted Tue Aug 5 2008 07:55:07 by AeroVega
175th Tactical Fighter Group posted Wed Oct 26 2011 19:23:58 by fishmanz
"Pride Of China" Fighter Jet Nosedives Into Field posted Fri Oct 14 2011 11:35:48 by MadameConcorde
Fighter Pilots Age Limits posted Tue Aug 2 2011 09:12:07 by b767

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format