Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swedish MOD: Gripen Was'nt Best Choice For Norway  
User currently offlineMortyman From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3701 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 7053 times:

The Swediss minister of defence admits that Gripen was'nt the best choice for Norway, considering Norway's needs.


The Swedish defence minister still disagree that the Gripen would be much more expensive for Norway than the F 35 and he also dislikes the way the news of the desicion to scrap the gripen was presented.


However he admits that the gripen plane was not the best choice for Norway, taking into account the demands that Norway had set for a new fighterplane.


First of all he says that wanted a fighter that can perform solo attacks against ground targets after having flown over enemy territory, defended by airdefence artillary and next generation fighters.

- In such a perspective, stealth capabilities become a central factor.

The Swedish MOD admits that the Gripen is not designed to operate on lonely solo tours without adittional airsupport radar. The Gripen is constructed as a system to be a part of a bigger system.


Number 2, Norway wanted an aircraft that could operate and engadge in a fight far away from it's base. Also here, the stealth capabilities of the F 35 will be of significance to Norway.

Number 3, Norway wanted a plane with big and heavy weapons ment for ground targets in adittion to full armour for selfdefence.


- The Gripen is not particularly adapted for this.

- Since Sweden and other possible export countries, don't priorities heavy attackcapabilities, the Norwegian assesment says fairly little about gripen having weaknesses,compared to our needs, says the Swedish mod

He added however that Gripen is an excellent aircraft for defending land and seaterritory

- Gripen is very well capable for survailance and control of airspace


The Sedish mod. is however surprised that Norway has put so much focus on bombing capabilities.


Article in Norwegian:

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article2878696.ece

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 7012 times:

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
The Swediss minister of defence admits that Gripen was'nt the best choice for Norway, considering Norway's needs.


No problem!

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
The Swedish defence minister still disagree that the Gripen would be much more expensive for Norway than the F 35 and he also dislikes the way the news of the desicion to scrap the gripen was presented

We never forgive you for that!  sarcastic 

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
First of all he says that wanted a fighter that can perform solo attacks against ground targets after having flown over enemy territory, defended by airdefence artillary

Iran? Irac? Afghanistan?

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
Number 2, Norway wanted an aircraft that could operate and engadge in a fight far away from it's base. Also here, the stealth capabilities of the F 35 will be of significance to Norway.

Iran?,Irac? Afghanistan?

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
Number 3, Norway wanted a plane with big and heavy weapons ment for ground targets in adittion to full armour for selfdefence.

Iran? Irac?,Afghanistan..?

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
He added however that Gripen is an excellent aircraft for defending land and seaterritory

Like Norway??

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
- Gripen is very well capable for survailance and control of airspace

Not the main objective obviously

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
The Sedish mod. is however surprised that Norway has put so much focus on bombing capabilities.

Don't also forget that the F-35 is an American made!
        

[Edited 2009-01-25 05:41:59]


It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineKiqaboy From Sweden, joined Feb 2006, 170 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6965 times:

Hej hur ar lagert, jag forsoker inte glomma Svenska.

I m not trying, but lets get back to the topic, i think that the client has always right, when a client comes to me i always have to agree what he reacquires, if he wants a crane to shot his clip i have to hire one, if he want's to edit his clip on final cut pro then i hire some one that has that.
BTW Gripen is a great AC i hope that my country some day will be able to make some money and bye some AC the Gripen would just be great for a territory like Kosova.

Kiqa



once upone time
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 6945 times:



Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 2):
Hej hur ar lagert, jag forsoker inte glomma Svenska.

Your Swedish is almost perfect  bigthumbsup 

Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 2):
I m not trying, but lets get back to the topic, i think that the client has always right, when a client comes to me i always have to agree what he reacquires

Absolutely! no one blame Norway for needing the F-35.

Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 2):
BTW Gripen is a great AC i hope that my country some day will be able to make some money and bye some AC the Gripen would just be great for a territory like Kosova

Just give SAAB a call  Wink



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineF27Friendship From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 1125 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 6927 times:



Quoting SAS A340 (Reply 1):
Don't also forget that the F-35 is an American made!

don't also forget that Norway is a member of NATO and Sweden is not. So all the similiarties your 2 countries might have do not apply for its military needs.


User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6903 times:



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 4):
don't also forget that Norway is a member of NATO and Sweden is not. So all the similiarties your 2 countries might have do not apply for its military needs.

I agree with you on that,never claimed anyting else,but reading Norweigen newspaper,it was not that uninportant that it was American made! No contract,less contact! was the word from US so i don't blame any NATO member for claiming it's choise regarding to future NATO op.
 covereyes 



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineKiqaboy From Sweden, joined Feb 2006, 170 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6901 times:

Yep i think i should call SAAB and tell them that I'm from the Ministry of Security of Kosova and just say bring 5 pics of Gripen and then i might put my government in trouble with SAAB  biggrin 
Tack so mycke jag tanker at komma til Sverige i Sommarn.



once upone time
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6892 times:



Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 6):
Tack so mycke jag tanker at komma til Sverige i Sommarn.

Välkommen!  wave  (Welcome)

Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 6):
Yep i think i should call SAAB and tell them that I'm from the Ministry of Security of Kosova and just say bring 5 pics of Gripen and then i might put my government in trouble with SAAB

Maybe you should keep a low profile  Wink



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineKiqaboy From Sweden, joined Feb 2006, 170 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 6871 times:

Actually I'm not from the government, btw witch countries has the Gripen now in their service beside Sweden


once upone time
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6711 times:



Quoting Kiqaboy (Reply 8):
Actually I'm not from the government, btw witch countries has the Gripen now in their service beside Sweden

Hungary has 14. (NATO)
Czech republic has 14 (NATO)
South Africa has 26
Thailand have 6 to be delivered and another pos. for 6 later on.
ETPS has 2....i think...not sure! (European test pilot school)

Swiss are in the finals to make a decision on 20-30 fighters where rumors says that Gripen has good chances.

Usefull link: http://www.gripen.com/en/MediaRelations/Image_base.htm?intcmp=123456



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineTGIF From Sweden, joined Apr 2008, 276 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 6619 times:



Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
considering Norway's needs

It's a shame Norway didn't manage to include these needs in the RBI. It would have saved Saab some  dollarsign  dollarsign  dollarsign 

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):
Norway wanted a plane with big and heavy weapons ment for ground targets in adittion to full armour for selfdefence.

No doubt the F-35 can carry more munition when using external stores, Gripen NG isn't half bad as a bomber. If I got my numbers right, any of the following four configurations will be quite sufficient:
- 6 NSM (JSM?)
- 8 GBU-12
- 4 GBU-10
- 24 SDB


User currently offlineJabs From Portugal, joined Feb 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 6402 times:



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 4):

don't also forget that Norway is a member of NATO and Sweden is not. So all the similiarties your 2 countries might have do not apply for its military needs.

In the past the Danish used the SAAB Draken.


User currently offlineF27Friendship From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 1125 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6302 times:



Quoting Jabs (Reply 11):
In the past the Danish used the SAAB Draken.

and how is that relevant for the current situation?


User currently offlineTGIF From Sweden, joined Apr 2008, 276 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6276 times:



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 12):
Quoting Jabs (Reply 11):
In the past the Danish used the SAAB Draken.

and how is that relevant for the current situation?

I think he was referring to the fact that Denmark was part of NATO when they operated the Draken (the true 'F-35'  Smile ) Perhaps they learned that sharing a platform with NATO allies Norway, Netherlands etc is better than sharing one with non-NATO members Sweden, Finland and Austria.


User currently offlineJabs From Portugal, joined Feb 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 6176 times:



Quoting TGIF (Reply 13):
Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 12):
Quoting Jabs (Reply 11):
In the past the Danish used the SAAB Draken.

and how is that relevant for the current situation?

I think he was referring to the fact that Denmark was part of NATO when they operated the Draken (the true 'F-35' ) Perhaps they learned that sharing a platform with NATO allies Norway, Netherlands etc is better than sharing one with non-NATO members Sweden, Finland and Austria.

That's right!


User currently offlineJabs From Portugal, joined Feb 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 6171 times:



Quoting Jabs (Reply 14):
Quoting TGIF (Reply 13):
Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 12):
Quoting Jabs (Reply 11):
In the past the Danish used the SAAB Draken.

and how is that relevant for the current situation?

I think he was referring to the fact that Denmark was part of NATO when they operated the Draken (the true 'F-35' ) Perhaps they learned that sharing a platform with NATO allies Norway, Netherlands etc is better than sharing one with non-NATO members Sweden, Finland and Austria.

That's right!

The US put some pressure on Poland to choose the F-16 and not the Gripen.


User currently offlineF27Friendship From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 1125 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6065 times:



Quoting TGIF (Reply 13):
I think he was referring to the fact that Denmark was part of NATO when they operated the Draken (the true 'F-35'   ) Perhaps they learned that sharing a platform with NATO allies Norway, Netherlands etc is better than sharing one with non-NATO members Sweden, Finland and Austria.



Quoting Jabs (Reply 14):
That's right!

ow ok.. I thought you were trying to draw the opposite conclusion from those facts


User currently offlineJabs From Portugal, joined Feb 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6003 times:



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 16):
ow ok.. I thought you were trying to draw the opposite conclusion from those facts

No problem. I thought you were saying that was not a good idea a NATO country buying from a non-NATO country.


User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5967 times:



Quoting Jabs (Reply 17):
No problem. I thought you were saying that was not a good idea a NATO country buying from a non-NATO country.

I believe the Danish AF got very good service from the Drakens and I've never read that they had any real issues with the airplane. Bear in mind that Sweden builds fighters to meet its needs first and it follows they don't necessarily meet the needs of surrounding nations or nations around the world. Nevertheless, some nations find Swedish designed fighters meet their needs very well and this seems to be proving all the more true with the J39. I don't believe even the J35 saw as many exports as the J39 has and I suspect the newer fighter hasn't seen the last of its export possibilities.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5925 times:



Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 18):
I believe the Danish AF got very good service from the Drakens and I've never read that they had any real issues with the airplane. Bear in mind that Sweden builds fighters to meet its needs first and it follows they don't necessarily meet the needs of surrounding nations or nations around the world. Nevertheless, some nations find Swedish designed fighters meet their needs very well and this seems to be proving all the more true with the J39. I don't believe even the J35 saw as many exports as the J39 has and I suspect the newer fighter hasn't seen the last of its export possibilities.

Very true  Smile But the Draken was a far more success regarding nr builds,totaly almost 700 units where built and Sweden had 600 of them and about 100 where in service abroad. Gripen has as of today ben build in approx. 210 units where 60-65 are to be doing service with other air forces. Hopefully there will be a couple more  Wink
Weather Denmark will take the same road as Norway ore maybe even go for the Gripen ore the F-18..?..it will probably not be a "swede"  optimist 
 wave 



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineF27Friendship From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 1125 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5909 times:



Quoting Jabs (Reply 17):
I thought you were saying that was not a good idea a NATO country buying from a non-NATO country.

I was (and I did not see the relevance of it happening in the past for this particular competition)

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 18):
Bear in mind that Sweden builds fighters to meet its needs first and it follows they don't necessarily meet the needs of surrounding nations or nations around the world.

and that is the whole issue

Sweden's needs in this case allign with those of Hungary, Czech republic and south-africa (and Switzerland and Austria for that matter) because they are only interested in guarding sovereign air space. These countries do not have any expeditionary ambitions like Norway, Denmark or the Netherlands (or Belgium, but it seams the're gonna buy F-35 off the shelve or not have any fast jets in the future at all)


User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4690 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5903 times:



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 20):
Sweden's needs in this case allign with those of Hungary, Czech republic and south-africa (and Switzerland and Austria for that matter)

Alas, there was a "misalignment" in Austria's case.....  Wink

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Lofting
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Priesch - Spotterteam Graz




"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineF27Friendship From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 1125 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (5 years 2 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5842 times:



Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 21):
Alas, there was a "misalignment" in Austria's case.....  

jep indeed.. the Eurofighter deal certainly was not in the best interest of the Austrian taxpayer if you ask me..

but then again, these buys are always highly political and for similar reasons the swiss might buy tranche 1/2 frames from germany (for which they will get tranche 3 frames themselves)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Swedish MOD: Gripen Was'nt Best Choice For Norway
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Norway Requests Gripen Offer For F-16 Replacement posted Fri Jan 18 2008 03:06:39 by Art
Norway: Socialist Parties Go For JSF Over Grippen posted Tue Nov 4 2008 03:28:36 by Keesje
Was There Replacement For The F-8u posted Sat Apr 22 2006 19:27:24 by 747400sp
Gripen For Denmark -- The Future Has Arrived posted Fri Jan 6 2006 16:34:42 by Columba
Best Tanker Option For Usaf? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 15:08:24 by KC135TopBoom
Brazil Signs Air Force Deal For Mi-35 Helicopters posted Tue Dec 2 2008 09:30:29 by Keesje
Why Was The Mirage 4000 A Failure? posted Mon Dec 1 2008 23:28:27 by Max Q
Norway Celebrates Delivery Of C-130J posted Tue Nov 25 2008 11:35:17 by OyKIE
Norway To Buy JSF posted Thu Nov 20 2008 07:35:20 by Oykie
Beginning Of The End For Ares? posted Tue Oct 28 2008 02:37:51 by Connies4ever

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format