Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Customers For The New T-50  
User currently offlineTomh From United States of America, joined May 1999, 960 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 8 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4491 times:

The Lockheed Martin/KAI supersonic T-50 trainer flew for the first time on August 20, 2002. News releases indicate that the aircraft will be marketed worldwide, and that it will prepare pilots to fly sophisticated aircraft such as the F-22 and JSF. I find that last claim to be quite interesting.

Has USAF or USN shown any interest in the T-50?

Has USAF planned for a T-38 replacement, or will we have it in the T-50?

If USN is interested, do they need to continue production of the T-45?

If US forces do receive this aircraft, will they really designate it the T-50? After all, the new Raytheon trainer is the T-6A. Really, must we in the US continue with this whimsical trainer designation nonsense that has been going on for a decade?

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 9 hours ago) and read 4417 times:

The USAF/USN's plans do not involve the T50.

The T38 is being upgraded w/ new inlets that optimize the a/c for subsonic flight, as that is where the vast majority of the flight training envelope is (as well as other improvements/ primarily avionics).

The T45 was budgeted in the 1990s w/ potentially a 40 yr service life, and has only been in service since the mid 1990s. As was learned from "navalizing" the BAE Hawk from which the T45 was derived, it is highly unlikely the T50 would even pass a preliminary review for naval service.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Customers For The New T-50
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Aircraft For The New Nato Countries posted Mon Mar 29 2004 20:55:09 by Vio
Aurora - New Fuel For The Fire posted Wed Jun 14 2006 23:58:28 by RichardPrice
New VIP Aircrafts For The German Goverment posted Sun Jan 15 2006 13:51:15 by Columba
Looking For The Red Flag Accident Video posted Fri Oct 20 2006 21:35:14 by RichardPrice
Replacement For The Superhornet posted Fri Sep 29 2006 17:50:02 by 747400sp
Winglets For The E-6 Mercury posted Sat Sep 16 2006 20:57:56 by 747400sp
Why Not A B-736 For The Army's Sigint? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 01:57:52 by DEVILFISH
Why No Military Name For The JT8-D? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 01:37:35 by 747400sp
Super SeaSprites For The RAN, Is It The End? posted Mon May 15 2006 09:59:38 by Ozair
Was There Replacement For The F-8u posted Sat Apr 22 2006 19:27:24 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format