Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
First C-5 Rerp Production Aircraft Inducted  
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5158 times:

The tail number is 83-1285, they have an error in the story...but from Lockheed-Martin
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/p...009/090819ae_c5_1st-mod-lands.html

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDragon6172 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1203 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5146 times:

Any pictures out of what the new glass cockpit looks like?


Phrogs Phorever
User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5127 times:



Quoting Dragon6172 (Reply 1):
Any pictures out of what the new glass cockpit looks like?

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives/2007/articles/jan_07/cockpits/images/cockpits/c5m_full.jpg



Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineDragon6172 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1203 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 5107 times:



Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 2):

Thanks!! Nice looking set up. The screens look about the same as the Rockwell Collins screens that are going into the C-12s I work on.



Phrogs Phorever
User currently offlineWingnut135 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 134 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 5062 times:

Anything change on the FE panel? I would assume it had, as I'm now working C-130Js and it's night and day to the C-130E.

Wingnut



A good friend will get you out of jail. A real friend will be there with you saying, "Damn that was fun!"
User currently offlineJohnM From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 5012 times:



Quoting Wingnut135 (Reply 4):

The FE panel didn't change too much for AMP mod. The old analog engine instruments are gone, and replaced with an additonal MFDU, the same as what the yoke yankers have. A few additional minor changes. Single battery, DC panel changed some.

The M model FE panel has a few more changes, but not too radical. APU egt is gone, now displayed on the MFDU. Engine electronic control power switches are new, and the AC pwr panel is different, as well as bleed air panel. MADAR is replaced with a new system that uses a MILTOPE laptop, looks somewhat like old MADAR. Fuel temp ind gone. Hyd, and fuel panels didn't change. DC panel is a bit different, the aircraft now has 2 batts, one being for the APUs.

Big changes with the circuit breaker panels. Legacy, AMP, and M models are pretty different. What was easy to find in the old days can be a challenge now.....Of course the T.O.s are at times very different.

However, get out of the cockpit, and the M model is a bit more different....


User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4938 times:

I have to say, the C-5M is quite impressive. They did a demo @ Dovers open house back in June, and they got it off the ground around 1800-2000 feet. There is a youtube video of it taking off somewhere...it was on the Saturday show (June 20th). Even from what I have read about Oshkosh AirVentures take off, alot of people were impressed on how quick it got off the ground. I'm looking forward to seeing 69-0024 getting back from PDM. The first "freshly painted" C-5M! That and I need to get its tail shot for my collection!

User currently offlineWingnut135 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 134 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4797 times:



Quoting JohnM (Reply 5):
Hyd, and fuel panels didn't change.

I would have thoght the fuel panel would be a big one to fix, I remember it being a pain in the a$$ at times when you're doing a long refuel. I guess the USAF spent too much money on the mood lighting on the flight deck of the C-130J.

Did they change the circuit breaker panels to ECBUs (Electronic Circuit Breaker Unit) like on the J? Instead of a physical breaker you tell the computer not to send power to the part (in a round about way).

Wingnut



A good friend will get you out of jail. A real friend will be there with you saying, "Damn that was fun!"
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4781 times:



Quoting Wingnut135 (Reply 7):

No, they are still physical breakers. I have some pictures of the arrival ceremony here on Fence Check; http://www.fencecheck.com/forums/index.php/topic,18279.0.html


User currently offlineHawaiianHobo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4614 times:

There are some other minor flight deck differences to the RERP C-5's versus the AMP'ed C-5's that the picture above doesn't show. The throttles on the RERP jets are brand new, getting rid of the "lollipop" looking ones on the picture above. The throttle movement is much smoother and more responsive and the linkage isn't subject to the same fouling up the old linkage is/was suffering from. The FE panel changes from Legacy and AMP to RERP include a new VAC electrical panel, replaces the left and right APU switches with a much easier "RUN/STOP" toggle switch, and (I THINK) removes the hydraulic pump bypass switches.

I'm sorry I don't have a picture. I was focused on the new lighting in the cargo compartment I totally forgot to snap any shots of anything.

-J



...
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4608 times:



Quoting HawaiianHobo (Reply 9):
and (I THINK) removes the hydraulic pump bypass switches

What hydraulic pump bypass switches? As a former hydraulic troop, I never heard of bypass switches on the C-5. No switches for hydraulics were removed, they are all the same, including the depress valves for the engines, and the start switches for the ATMs. The APU switches are dial knobs that are Stop, Run and Start.
The engine throttles, spoiler and flap handles are new. The entire annunciator light strip was removed. Again, go check out my fence check pictures of the cockpit that I posted in my previous posts link.


User currently offlineHawaiianHobo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4576 times:



Quoting Galaxy5007 (Reply 10):
What hydraulic pump bypass switches?

I'm sorry, I was referring to the ATM pump switches. Sometimes you say "ATM" and people get the wrong idea. I figured people would understand "bypass" better. Anyway, I thought they removed them but I wasn't positive. Thanks for the clear up!

Do you know if there is any truth to the rumor floating around Dover about the new cargo lighting not being installed on the rest of the fleet? My crew and I were told (from a young crewchief, mind you) during a tour that the lights "probably" wouldn't be installed because of difficulty with the installation.

I wish they'd throw in some commercial "first class" seats for us loads in the troop compartment  Smile



...
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4573 times:



Quoting HawaiianHobo (Reply 11):
Do you know if there is any truth to the rumor floating around Dover about the new cargo lighting not being installed on the rest of the fleet? My crew and I were told (from a young crewchief, mind you) during a tour that the lights "probably" wouldn't be installed because of difficulty with the installation.

The new cargo lighting will be installed on all the M models. It has already proven its worth compared to the troublesome legacy lighting system. That young crew chief might of been thinking about the A models not being RERPed. The lighting is actually not that difficult to install. They have all the insulation down during the mod anyways, so that clears up any concerns about wiring, and the mounts are easy to fabricate from what I've seen.


User currently offlineHawaiianHobo From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4563 times:



Quoting Galaxy5007 (Reply 12):
That young crew chief might of been thinking about the A models not being RERPed.

I hope so, the new lights are perfect and I'd hate to think we'd be stuck with the old ones forever. One of our engineers suggested that maybe it was due to rough landings and that maybe the lights just couldn't take it but I doubt it since the C-17 has similar lighting and they land on surfaces way rougher than what we land on... (throw in a good "no landing gear" joke in for good measure)
 duck 

Great pics on fencecheck! Spirit of Global Reach was the jet we got the tour of. I can't wait for us here in Cali to start getting our "M's and N's" ...that is, if they really DO plan on RERP'ing the SCM birds.



...
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4543 times:



Quoting HawaiianHobo (Reply 13):
that is, if they really DO plan on RERP'ing the SCM birds

As of now they are still approved...just need to be funded. There have been rumors over here on the east coast that Travis is going to give up their C-5s all together for another squadron of C-17s, and the same rumor is going for Stewart IAP. They want to retire the POS planes that just never get off the ground, and give the B models off to Lackland. Rumors are always fun to analyze...so who knows whats going to come of it all.
Thanks for the complements! It was a chilly day, but it was worth it! 69-0024 is due back from PDM in 2 weeks, so I'm hoping to get some pics of a newly painted C-5M  Smile


User currently offlineJohnM From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4529 times:



Quoting HawaiianHobo (Reply 9):
and (I THINK) removes the hydraulic pump bypass switches.

I think you might mean the ATM on/REMOTE/off switches. Do you guys remember what the REMOTE position does? Bet you remember now.

I think the M panel kept the remote position. Not 100% sure, but if memory serves, the M panel looks just like legacy, including the useless remote position of the switch. I've never seen the remote function used. Especially since the FE seat has to be occupied when ground troops run the ATM.


User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4485 times:



Quoting JohnM (Reply 15):
I've never seen the remote function used. Especially since the FE seat has to be occupied when ground troops run the ATM.

They didn't change anything on the hydro panel. The Remote function doesn't work on any of the C-5s. We have tried it on at least 40 jets, and none worked. I think they deactivated it long ago. The FE seat has to be occupied at home station, but those rules always get bent off station.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic First C-5 Rerp Production Aircraft Inducted
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
First Iris-T Serial Production Missile Delivered posted Tue Dec 6 2005 01:41:51 by TheSonntag
First Carrier Borne Stealth Aircraft.... posted Wed Jun 30 2004 23:25:52 by PPGMD
First Eurohawk Rolls-Out posted Tue Aug 4 2009 10:52:15 by Columba
USN Aircraft Carrier With Island On The Left? posted Sat Aug 1 2009 22:34:31 by Max Q
Usaf Launches Coin Light Attack Aircraft posted Fri Jul 31 2009 21:08:47 by ThePointblank
Usaf Chartering An-124 & IL76 Aircraft? posted Sat Jul 25 2009 11:41:45 by TropicBird
Senate Votes To Halt Production Of F22 posted Tue Jul 21 2009 11:34:40 by Stealth777
D-19T Aluminum In Old Soviet Aircraft posted Mon Jul 6 2009 09:38:32 by Blackbird
JF-17 Finally Enters Production posted Wed Jul 1 2009 17:40:46 by Alberchico
Military/Commercial Aircraft posted Thu Jun 11 2009 09:52:46 by AncientPelican

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format