Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Last Shuttle To Leave Pad 39B. Bring On Ares 1-x  
User currently offlineEksath From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1305 posts, RR: 25
Posted (5 years 22 hours ago) and read 4055 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
ARTICLE EDITOR

As mentioned in the thread title. I wanted to bring attention to this milestone.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Suresh A. Atapattu



Will post some more pics shortly.

[Edited 2009-09-19 12:58:48]


World Wide Aerospace Photography
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3523 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (5 years 22 hours ago) and read 4056 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The last shuttle to leave Pad 39A won't be until next year or perhaps sometime after that.

I think you mean Pad 39B...



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlineEksath From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1305 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (5 years 22 hours ago) and read 4047 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
ARTICLE EDITOR



Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
I think you mean Pad 39B...

You are correct. My typo.



World Wide Aerospace Photography
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3523 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 19 hours ago) and read 4010 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Nice photo BTW. Looks to be just before dawn. Thanks for posting it...


Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 10 hours ago) and read 3908 times:

According to NASA's Website, STS-129 (Atlantis OV-104) is planned for November 12th from Launch Pad 39A:

http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/schedule.html

I would really like to go see a night launch before they retire the fleet.

A question slightly off topic but is or was Vandenberg AFB ever an option for landing a Shuttle if both Edwards and Kennedy were covered by weather? 15,000 foot X 200 foot long runaway and not too far from Edwards.

David



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3523 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 hours ago) and read 3860 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Tiger119 (Reply 4):
A question slightly off topic but is or was Vandenberg AFB ever an option for landing a Shuttle if both Edwards and Kennedy were covered by weather? 15,000 foot X 200 foot long runaway and not too far from Edwards.

Vandenberg was the primary recovery location for flights that would have originated there. One must remember that USAF was very close, only months away, from being able to launch shuttles from Vandenberg at the time of the Challenger accident.

Only USAFs post-Challenger switch to expendables and a launch exhaust duct design problem (which would have been solved IMHO) prevented Vandenberg from being stood up as a shuttle launch site.

So certainly Vandenberg was an option for landing.



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 4 hours ago) and read 3842 times:



Quoting Tiger119 (Reply 4):
15,000 foot X 200 foot long runaway and not too far from Edwards.



Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 5):
So certainly Vandenberg was an option for landing

- I would think the fact of its proximity to Edwards and the fact their runways are at different angles would make it a good option for divert. My question is weather and whether weather conditions at VBG would be the same as EDW at the same time?

- Also, when the flight director and team decide on the landing location, what happens if something (weather comes to mind) to primary? Would the shuttle be able to divert from landing at EDW to VBG or KSC after they begin deorbit proceedures begin?

- What airports are the primary diverts for the Shuttle Program?

David



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3523 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 hours ago) and read 3833 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Tiger119 (Reply 6):
- I would think the fact of its proximity to Edwards and the fact their runways are at different angles would make it a good option for divert. My question is weather and whether weather conditions at VBG would be the same as EDW at the same time?

The decision of where to land is made before the deorbit burn (an hour prior to landing). Once the deorbit burn is made they're committed, from an operational standpoint if not aerodynamic. USAF insisted on a cross range capability and that's why shuttle has a big delta wing vs a lifting body or other solution. Given that Vandenberg is on the coast and Edwards is an inland desert I suspect that respective weather conditions are rather different. Runway changes can be made late in the entry if winds should change.

There are lots of variables that go into picking a landing sites, weather is but one.....

Quoting Tiger119 (Reply 6):
- Also, when the flight director and team decide on the landing location, what happens if something (weather comes to mind) to primary? Would the shuttle be able to divert from landing at EDW to VBG or KSC after they begin deorbit proceedures begin?

The weather is well studied and acceptable prior to the burn or they stay in orbit. As mentioned above shuttle does have a cross range capability, I don't know if Mission Control would order it be used post deorbit burn or not - they haven't yet.

Quoting Tiger119 (Reply 6):
- What airports are the primary diverts for the Shuttle Program?

Edwards and White Sands



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Last Shuttle To Leave Pad 39B. Bring On Ares 1-x
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Big John Last Visit To Norfolk posted Fri Feb 23 2007 00:41:01 by 747400sp
Due To A400M, UK Mulls Follow-on Order For 3 C-17s posted Thu Dec 28 2006 19:59:32 by N328KF
Airbus To Decide By June 23 On Jet Plant, Tanker posted Mon May 23 2005 23:23:34 by Keesje
Last C-141s To Be Retired This Month posted Thu Apr 14 2005 00:56:54 by Socal
Last C-141s To Retire From Active Service 9/16 posted Wed Sep 15 2004 22:39:01 by Ulfinator
Lufwaffe Transferred Last Mig To Poland posted Fri Aug 13 2004 21:35:58 by NoUFO
Usaf To Put 2 MOPs On B-2A posted Thu Aug 20 2009 12:34:30 by KC135TopBoom
Shuttle In 2011, ISS Past 2015, Ares I In 2017 posted Fri Jul 31 2009 00:01:26 by Rwessel
Two Shuttles On Two Pads For One Last Time posted Mon Apr 20 2009 15:32:07 by Csturdiv
Listen To CAP Onloine On 271.000 posted Wed Mar 18 2009 09:59:44 by Wardialer

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format