Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could The CSeries Be Used For Military Tasks?  
User currently offlineAlberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2911 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 10222 times:





http://www.casr.ca/id-aerospace-daly-cseries.htm

Very interesting article. Would Canada go for such a project ?

[Edited 2009-10-06 19:54:17]


short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 10213 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As someone who, as a child, watched the Avro Arrow take to the air a few times (my father was an Avro engineer), I certainly hope so. But governments here are not known for taking bold steps in the national interest these days, and it would take a very compelling case for them to commit. Remember, this bird hasn't been built yet.

On the other hand, we did build our own frigates for the Navy ...



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently onlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4384 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 10169 times:

When is the right timing to replace the world wide Orions, and can such an aircraft have the same range as an Orion?

User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 10121 times:

And specifically, what advantage would such an aircraft have over the already existing P-8?

Looking at the performance specs of the C-series and the potential cost of engineering, I'd say it's a money pit.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently onlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8397 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 10103 times:

For the sake of argument, a bathroom stall _could_ be used for military purposes. It all depends on how and why.  Smile

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 10069 times:

I agree that Canada is capable of modifing the CSeris into various military roles, but even in the story, they talk about the MRTT version only being a short ranged tanker, for domestic opertions, or tactical operations only. So, to me range of the tankers or ASW versions would be a killer of the overall projects of ASW and MRTT. Light and medium cargo/transport functions could easily be handled by these aircraft, freeing up the CC-130E/H/Js and CC-150s.

User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 10062 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Spacepope (Reply 3):
And specifically, what advantage would such an aircraft have over the already existing P-8?

Well, "specifically" it would be built by a Canadian company employing Canadians (I know, there's lots of foreign subcontracting). But given the current spat we're having with "Buy America" language in the US stimulus package, and given the battle being waged between Boeing and Airbus over that tanker project, maybe a "Buy Canada" clause isn't such a bad thing.

As the article points out, we used to do this kind of thing all the time. In the 50s, the RCAF flew a Canadian designed and built fighter -- the CF-100 -- and if they hadn't cancelled the Arrow, that would have continued well into the 70s and perhaps beyond. But when you combined the government's lack of vision with an outrageously expensive RCAF weapons requirement, the plane was doomed.

Whether it would have any operational advantage over the P-8 I don't know, since no one at Bombardier has addressed this possibility and drawn up any specs. Putting aside the rah-rah nationalism, I wouldn't expect the government to buy a Canadian product if it didn't meet the mission requirements and wasn't cost-effective. Unfortunately, we've had a sorry history of avoiding home-grown products even when they do meet the mission requirements.



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1669 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9996 times:

We don't want orphan fleets anymore. The current CF policy is to buy as much as it can off the shelf with little modifications, as maintaining the many orphan fleets is very expensive. Take the CP-140 Aurora. The base airframe is the good old USN P-3 Orion, but the avionics and sensors are taken off the S-3A Viking. While everyone else who flies standard P-3's are taking advantage of the USN's upgrades, we have been forced to develop our own upgrades and maintain unique systems at our own cost.

User currently offlineSpectre242 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 9965 times:

You may be on to something - the low, pointy nose and refueling probe on the maritime patrol aircraft on top seems very reminiscent of the Nimrods (even the color is a good match); makes it look very natural to my eye at least. If it was all down to looking the part, it would be a winner!

In seriousness though, a CSeries military aircraft looks good on paper at least. It gives an excellent, very modern airframe that is fits in a nice size between the larger 737-based P-3 and Wedgetail, and the much smaller biz-jet and ERJ sized mini-AWACSs, ASTOR, etc. Could suit the needs of many mid-sized air forces in multiple applications.

But I doubt Canada would likely kick-off the program alone, it would also need another large order from another ally to help get it going and spread the costs. Australia is already going with the 737-based platforms, and the UK is getting new Nimrods, which would have otherwise struck me as two good candidates for CSeries-based aircraft. Who else will need mid-sized patrol aircraft replacements in the next decade or so?

Also, didn't Bombardier start touting the Q400 earlier this year for potential military applications too?


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29791 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 9948 times:

It would be nice to see Canada develop it's own military platforms again.

I do question if a small RJ is the correct choice, when considering the large amout of surface area they have to operate in. The country does border 3 different oceans after all.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5678 posts, RR: 45
Reply 10, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9935 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Spectre242 (Reply 8):
But I doubt Canada would likely kick-off the program alone,

Very valid point

Quoting Spectre242 (Reply 8):
Who else will need mid-sized patrol aircraft replacements in the next decade or so?

With Australia going for P-8, Japan developing their own P-1 that leaves about 120 P-3 out in the wild that will need replacing in the coming decades, the trouble is most of them are relatively small operators. Canada would have to get several on board to make a program viable rather than just one other sizeable user.
Having said that many of them will have budget issues with a P-8 platform and the ERJ/Astor sized platforms too small so there could be some mileage in it.

Cheers



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4775 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9724 times:



Quoting Spectre242 (Reply 8):
Who else will need mid-sized patrol aircraft replacements in the next decade or so?

Also, didn't Bombardier start touting the Q400 earlier this year for potential military applications too?

India is buying the E-2D Hawkeye to supplement their Il-76s and the P-8Is they selected.....

http://www.tekmicro.com/images_PRODS/E2Dcutaway.jpg

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...ced-hawkeye-as-relations-warm.html

Canada could conceivably get a land-based MP variant of that for its medium range requirements, or at least the systems that go into it (for integration into a Q300 or Q400) to avoid building the thing from scratch - and just supplement those with UAVs. For the longer-ranged missions, I think buying into the P-8A program would be more cost-effective for the number of platforms the CF require, than developing a dedicated version of the CSeries. It's a toss-up if national interests or fiscal and logistical realities would dictate the course of such a program - although it could be said that the latter two also fall under the former's mantle.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 9670 times:

If the 737 based Poseidon is a good idea, I can't see why a CS100 based MPA would be a bad idea. It would be leaner, cheaper and more modern.



User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7094 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (4 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 9599 times:



Quoting Arrow (Reply 1):
On the other hand, we did build our own frigates for the Navy ...

Hmm but since the both the yards which built the frigates have either been closed or mothballed it would be pretty difficult to do it again.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Could The CSeries Be Used For Military Tasks?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Long Will The ISS Be Used? posted Sun Feb 26 2006 20:07:28 by TheSonntag
Could The 2707 Have Been Useful To The Military? posted Thu Aug 31 2006 01:14:46 by 747400sp
Best Airshow For Military Aircraft? posted Thu May 14 2009 02:09:33 by B787
Could Gas Turbines Been Used In A Super Carrier? posted Fri Sep 5 2008 14:10:24 by 747400sp
Who's Plane Is This? And What Is It Used For? posted Sat Dec 1 2007 20:52:26 by Boeingluvr
Could The Usaf Use The C-30? posted Mon Nov 5 2007 06:00:58 by KC135TopBoom
Would The USN Sell Used Aircraft Carriers? posted Wed Aug 8 2007 21:48:50 by A342
Could The Space Shuttle Land On Water? posted Sun Apr 22 2007 16:39:50 by Pizzaandplanes
The EH-101 Repacement For Marine One - When? posted Sun Oct 29 2006 18:53:05 by Gh123
For Military Buffs - Hypothetical Re Carrier Group posted Wed Jun 7 2006 22:52:21 by AerospaceFan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format