Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Silent Eagle For KF-X?  
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4696 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 12266 times:



In my view, the best prospect yet for the F-15SE Silent Eagle has just emerged.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...requirements-come-to-the-fore.html

Quote:
"He points out that South Korea will be better served by going for an off-the-shelf solution such as the Boeing F/A-18E/F, Eurofighter Typhoon and the latest version of the F-15, the Silent Eagle. 'These can provide much of the capability that South Korea requires. Think about it. It will take the Koreans more than 10 years to indigenously develop an aircraft that is already in existence. It won't be unrealistic to think that t he aircraft will be dated by the time it comes out. Without a doubt, an off-the-shelf purchase will meet the operational requirements at a much lower cost.'

[.....]

The F-35 is being pushed by Washington as the main fighter to be exported by the country to replace existing third- and fourth-generation aircraft. South Korea would follow the likes of Singapore, which also has F-16s and F-15s and will eventually replace them with the JSF.

But if there are any delays in the F-35, Boeing stands ready to offer its F-15SE as an alternative. Indeed, the Silent Eagle was proposed for customers such as South Korea, which would like to have a transition to aircraft that are more capable than their existing fourth-generation fighters, but are not sure about the F-35 or its availability.

Industry sources indicate that Seoul could divide the third phase of the contract, going for another 20 F-15s first and then ordering the F-35 when it is ready.

'The F-15SE is very well positioned to win the contract. The issue of fifth generation is not just in South Korea, it is everywhere. Stealth is very sexy, fifth generation is very sexy. But we offer a twin-engined AESA-capable medium multi-role combat aircraft,' says Song.


An AESA-equipped Super Viper such as that proposed for India could be a dark-horse F-4 or F-16 replacement, but chances are the RoKAF would wait for the F-35.


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (4 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12193 times:

The F-35 isn't that far down the pike and I suspect the South Koreans might be willing to wait for it rather than spend the money for Silent Eagle in the meantime. Typhoon would be a good contender if South Korea is looking for a good swing role fighter, but then again it depends on what the F-35 has to offer that the Typhoon doesn't.


Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4696 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 11610 times:



Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 1):
The F-35 isn't that far down the pike and I suspect the South Koreans might be willing to wait for it rather than spend the money for Silent Eagle in the meantime.

With LockMart now offering a 2014 F-35 delivery date, this third phase of the KF-X competition promises to be a very hotly contested one.....


http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...y-date-for-south-koreas-first.html

Quote:
"Lockheed Martin remains confident that South Korea will select its F-35 Joint Strike Fighter for the third phase of its F-X competition, with the company saying that Seoul could even get access to the aircraft from 2014 if required.

'The F-35 is the best value fighter for South Korea. The country has received a classified briefing, and studies are under way to see if the aircraft can fit the various capabilities required by the air force. This will continue into 2010,' says Steve O'Brien, Lockheed's vice-president of F-35 business development."


.....if LM could stabilize its price and stick with that timeline.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 11289 times:

'"Boeing looks forward to Korea's anticipated competition. We are developing an advanced F-15, which we hope will fulfil Korea's defence capabilities and needs for many years to come," says Greg Laxton, vice-president Korea business development at Boeing Integrated Defense Systems.

"We are committed to building on the success of the F-15K next fighter I and II programmes, by working with our Korean industry partners to continue to strengthen Korea's aerospace industry."

Lockheed points out that only the F-35 and its F-22 Raptor are truly fifth-generation stealth fighters, while the F-15SE has only some "stealth elements", a fact that Boeing accepts.'

The thing that might swing the choice toward Boeing could be price. Could they possibly build the F-15 Silent Eagle for less than the F-35 is projected to cost?



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineCMB56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 230 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 10664 times:

I read a short very recent article in an aviation magazine, and then promptly lost track of which one, that descibed the F-15 stealth version as being equal to the F-35 in radar cross section (frontal). This was dependant on the level of stealth applied and mentioned the canted stabilizers. In addition this article also mentioned export controls of stealth technology and that Boeing was talking to the US governement about how much could be exported. Does anyone recall the publication this article was in. Is there any interest in the F-15(stealth) vs the F-35 for cost and availability. If you can get 90% of an F-36 for 60% the cost in 2 years would that not be attractive?

User currently offlinePar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 6729 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10592 times:

How about the US Air Force being the next customer for the silent eagle?
Remind us how the F-22 and F-35 were going to work together, since the F-22 got canned either the requirements are going to change the make the limited number work or there will be a shortfall of "heavy fighters"
The current F-15C's have and require structural modifications and they are also getting old, does anyone see the US government starting an F-22 replacement or an all new fighter design and production now?


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10498 times:

No, the USAF will not start a F-22 replacement program right now. But they could easily argue the F-15SE could supplement the F-22 force of 185 airplanes by buying some 200 F-15SEs. They could eaisly get more if they begin replacing the oldest F-15E MudHens.

Of course Congress could say if you want F-15SEs you have to reduce your F-35A buy by XXX number of airplanes. I think this will be a good trade off as I see the F-35A as more of a F-16C/D replacement than an F-15C/D replacement in capabilities.


User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 10455 times:



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 6):
Of course Congress could say if you want F-15SEs you have to reduce your F-35A buy by XXX number of airplanes. I think this will be a good trade off as I see the F-35A as more of a F-16C/D replacement than an F-15C/D replacement in capabilities.

Given the number of F-35As the Air Force wants, trading some of them for F-15SEs probably wouldn't turn into a big issue and Boeing would have military production beyond the Super Hornet, assuming more Super Hornets aren't ordered in the next year or so.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 10295 times:



Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 7):
Given the number of F-35As the Air Force wants, trading some of them for F-15SEs probably wouldn't turn into a big issue and Boeing would have military production beyond the Super Hornet, assuming more Super Hornets aren't ordered in the next year or so.

I think the USN still wants more Super Bugs, the RAAF could also increase their order, too (But I doubt that right now since they ordered 14 F-35As).

I would hope the USAF takes a close look at the F-15SE, but probibly will not unless some one else orders it (South Korea possibly).


User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 10265 times:

I have the feeling the US government is telling the South Koreans, Japanese, Israelies, Australians and other air forces the F15 is good enough for them.

Not everybody is convinced the F15 will take care of the new Flanker versions flooding Asia. (US for self protection neither, hence the F22).

The world has changed during the last 20 yrs, in terms of strenght, ambitions, capabilities and finance. I wonder how this will end. If the US keeps refusing to provide F22 to its allies, they'll look for alternatives. I think the US will bend for the billions.



User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16693 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 10243 times:



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 8):
I think the USN still wants more Super Bugs, the RAAF could also increase their order, too (But I doubt that right now since they ordered 14 F-35As)

The Air National Guard wants to acquire F-18E/Fs to replace F-16s and F-15, as I understand it the F-35 is not going to every ANG Unit. And the ANG units that do receive the F-35 will have to wait.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
If the US keeps refusing to provide F22 to its allies, they'll look for alternatives. I think the US will bend for the billions.

The F-22 will not be sold abroad.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 10205 times:



Quoting STT757 (Reply 10):
The F-22 will not be sold abroad.

That could have longer term strategic implications. The Chinese are putting their Billions in stealth too, the J-XX. Makes everyone nervous, e.g. India (who do a lot with Sukhoi). The Asian countries know what they want & have the resources. Times are changing. Keeping out = loosing influence. E.g. maybe Dassault is more constructive.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 10156 times:



Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
I have the feeling the US government is telling the South Koreans, Japanese, Israelies, Australians and other air forces the F15 is good enough for them.

Not everybody is convinced the F15 will take care of the new Flanker versions flooding Asia. (US for self protection neither, hence the F22).

The F-15, in the hands of a good pilot will not have a problem with the Flanker.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
The world has changed during the last 20 yrs, in terms of strenght, ambitions, capabilities and finance. I wonder how this will end. If the US keeps refusing to provide F22 to its allies, they'll look for alternatives. I think the US will bend for the billions.

The F=15Se looks to be an airplane with great possibilities. Some countries asked about the F-22, but how many could afford it if they were allowed to buy it?

Quoting STT757 (Reply 10):
The Air National Guard wants to acquire F-18E/Fs to replace F-16s and F-15, as I understand it the F-35 is not going to every ANG Unit. And the ANG units that do receive the F-35 will have to wait.

Those units will not get F/A-18E/Fs. the USAF simply will not buy it. The units that do not get new F-35s will get the airplanes from active duty units that get the F-35A.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 11):
Quoting STT757 (Reply 10):
The F-22 will not be sold abroad.

That could have longer term strategic implications. The Chinese are putting their Billions in stealth too, the J-XX. Makes everyone nervous, e.g. India (who do a lot with Sukhoi). The Asian countries know what they want & have the resources. Times are changing. Keeping out = loosing influence. E.g. maybe Dassault is more constructive.

Keep thinking that. I see many more possible international sales of Typhoons than I do of Rafels. Most countries do not need a carrier capable airplane, and the extra weight that comes with it.


User currently offlineWvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 516 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 9875 times:



Quoting STT757 (Reply 10):
The F-22 will not be sold abroad.

After 183 they wont be sold in the US either

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 12):
Keep thinking that. I see many more possible international sales of Typhoons than I do of Rafels. Most countries do not need a carrier capable airplane, and the extra weight that comes with it.

The F-35 is not just a carrier aircraft it has 3 versions only one of which being strickly built for aircraft carriers.


User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 39
Reply 14, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9853 times:



Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
I have the feeling the US government is telling the South Koreans, Japanese, Israelies, Australians and other air forces the F15 is good enough for them.

Which is why we steered clear of the F15, in any of its forms.

I do have a feeling that Dassault can provide the kind of plane these nations want - if demand exists for it.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 12):
The F=15Se looks to be an airplane with great possibilities. Some countries asked about the F-22, but how many could afford it if they were allowed to buy it?

Australia could. After all, we are throwing huge money at the F35. However, the powers that be keep saying that the F22 isn't a very good plane. It's hard to know if they really mean that, or if political influences are making them say nice things about the F18 Superhornet or F35 and bad things about the F22.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 9847 times:



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 13):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 12):
Keep thinking that. I see many more possible international sales of Typhoons than I do of Rafels. Most countries do not need a carrier capable airplane, and the extra weight that comes with it.

The F-35 is not just a carrier aircraft it has 3 versions only one of which being strickly built for aircraft carriers.

I know, the F-35A/B/C, but it was not the F-35 we were talking about in that reply.

Quoting Cpd (Reply 14):
Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
I have the feeling the US government is telling the South Koreans, Japanese, Israelies, Australians and other air forces the F15 is good enough for them.

Which is why we steered clear of the F15, in any of its forms.

Neither the F/A-18 or the F-35 are good interdiction mission F-111 replacements. The F-15E, or export versions can, almost do the F-111 mission.


User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4696 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9726 times:

Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
I have the feeling the US government is telling the South Koreans, Japanese, Israelies, Australians and other air forces the F15 is good enough for them.

The F-35 has supplanted the Eagle in that favored position.

Quoting Keesje (Reply 9):
Not everybody is convinced the F15 will take care of the new Flanker versions flooding Asia. (US for self protection neither, hence the F22).

Two countries recently bet with their wallets that it could - and that was not even this new SE version. As for flooding, only China and India have substantial numbers of those, mainly a foil against each other (in India's case at least). Even Russia is just building up its inventory only now. The F-22 in the U.S. is for deterrence and dominance.

I think the other Asian nations are more concerned with what's coming in the horizon.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...eal-on-pak-fa-fighter-variant.html

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/2590/19bh1.jpg
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/2590/19bh1.jpg

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600141/posts

Quoting Cpd (Reply 14):
Which is why we steered clear of the F15, in any of its forms.

A pity. Hindsight would prove if this has been sound.

Quoting Cpd (Reply 14):

Australia could. After all, we are throwing huge money at the F35.

With all the loud noises being made about the F-35's price, this bears watching.

[Edited 2009-12-13 07:38:08]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineCpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 39
Reply 17, posted (4 years 4 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 9627 times:



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 15):
Neither the F/A-18 or the F-35 are good interdiction mission F-111 replacements.

Even Lockheed Martin's representative says that the F35 is a great plane to replace the F111.

Goes to show you the sort of smoke and mirrors the politicians and the companies are playing back then.

We both know that the F111 was a very good plane, very fast, very long range and capable of carrying a heavy payload. Surely there must be demand for a new one that does a similar job?

The F15 isn't really the same thing.  Sad


User currently offlinePlayloud From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (4 years 4 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9483 times:



Quoting Cpd (Reply 17):
Even Lockheed Martin's representative says that the F35 is a great plane to replace the F111.

Aren't they rather biased?


User currently offlinePar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 6729 posts, RR: 8
Reply 19, posted (4 years 4 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 9419 times:



Quoting Cpd (Reply 17):
The F15 isn't really the same thing.

The F-111 is a unique a/c, for a replacement in the US military inventory you either go up to something like the B1 or you go down to something like the F-15E - two seater - I believe its the reason it was produced - I stand to be corrected -. At the time of the F-111 retirement the a/c in inventory best able to accomodate the missions whether bombing or weasel were the F-14, F-15 and the A6 Intruder, they offered the best options of range and speed, none are the ideal replacement, neither is the F-35.
I never understood why the Mud Hen was not looked at by the Air Force as an ECM a/c, it sure must hurt the Air Force to have Marines providing their ECM support in Navy a/c - A6 - even with the new Growlers, bummer  Smile


User currently offlinePlayloud From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (4 years 4 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 9329 times:



Quoting Par13del (Reply 19):
I never understood why the Mud Hen was not looked at by the Air Force as an ECM a/c, it sure must hurt the Air Force to have Marines providing their ECM support in Navy a/c - A6 - even with the new Growlers, bummer Smile

I agree completely. If you built an EF-15 (specialized modern build), you would have so many hardpoints for Jammer pods (the CFTs alone provide a lot), and still have a great fuel load. The huge AESA radar would also be great for jamming (isn't it it a lot bigger than the Growler's radar?)

It just seems like a no-brainer for me. The Marines want to make a jammer variant of the F-35, though unless they plan to make a 2-seat version, I don't see how that will work.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 21, posted (4 years 4 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 9292 times:



Quoting Par13del (Reply 19):
I never understood why the Mud Hen was not looked at by the Air Force as an ECM a/c, it sure must hurt the Air Force to have Marines providing their ECM support in Navy a/c - A6 - even with the new Growlers, bummer



Quoting Playloud (Reply 20):
I agree completely. If you built an EF-15 (specialized modern build), you would have so many hardpoints for Jammer pods (the CFTs alone provide a lot), and still have a great fuel load. The huge AESA radar would also be great for jamming (isn't it it a lot bigger than the Growler's radar?)

Because the USAF was not allowed to look at other platforms afther Clinton ordered the USAF to retire all F/FB/EF-111s in the mid 1990s. During the Bush years the USAF did look at apossible EB-52H as a big, wide area jammer, but that lost funding and support when the USAF decided to park some 30 B-52Hs.


User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1438 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (4 years 4 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 9288 times:

I wonder if USAF will be supplying aircrews for the Growlers like they already do for the EA-6B Prowlers?


I would help you but it is not in the contract
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (4 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9247 times:

In the early years of the F-15E's development and promotion, the FAST packs were reported to be able to carry all kinds of electronic gear and weren't thought of strictly as fuel tanks. It follows that had there been the will to go forward, the F-15E might have been further developed into a very effective EF15E variant and there was also talk of a Wild Weasel version of the F-15E but this, of course, didn't happen, presumably because of the projected cost. Hence we got the Wild Weasel version of the F-16.


Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlinePlayloud From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (4 years 4 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 9205 times:

I would love to see new build "Silent Eagle" EW versions of the F-15, though I can't see it actually happening.

25 Post contains links DEVILFISH : Update: Aviation Week reports that RCS testing for the Silent Eagle was conducted last year though it was not made public, nor was Boeing forthcoming
26 Post contains links and images DEVILFISH : Update: Boeing applies for license to brief South Korea on the Silent Eagle..... http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/u...ds/2009/03/f-15-silent-eagle-3
27 Post contains links DEVILFISH : Export license granted and first flight test with the CWB done..... http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...ts-with-export-license-flight.html Quote: "
28 Post contains links DEVILFISH : Missile launch video..... http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...arn10-fox-3-for-f-15-silent-e.html
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Silent Eagle For KF-X?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Store Production Facilities For Future Use posted Tue Oct 6 2009 07:54:26 by Rheinwaldner
Looking For P&W R-1340 To Buy For Texan posted Mon Oct 5 2009 02:33:34 by Art
New Boeing Trainer For T-X Contest posted Sat Oct 3 2009 07:31:38 by DEVILFISH
A Treat For Fellow B-1B Fans posted Fri Oct 2 2009 20:48:29 by 747400sp
Last Chance For The VH-71? posted Mon Sep 28 2009 11:16:01 by AirRyan
Time For A Space Federation? posted Sat Sep 12 2009 03:24:35 by Centrair
Hawker Hurricane P3351 For Sale posted Thu Aug 20 2009 04:53:58 by Slats
Suitability Of V-22 Osprey For CG SAR Missions posted Thu Aug 13 2009 08:29:18 by BOACVC10
Usaf Asks For 100 Coin Acft. posted Thu Aug 6 2009 18:49:06 by Venus6971
Report Casts Doubt On F-35B For UK Carriers posted Wed Aug 5 2009 19:04:42 by Art

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format