Broke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5299 times:
Though I was stationed stateside while I was in the Air Force, I had friends who were stationed at either of two radar sites on the west coast of Alaska. One site was Tin City AFS about 90 miles north of Nome and the other was at Cape Lisbourne. They told me that in the early '60's about 2/3's of all the traffic that they plotted was west of the international date line; you can use your imagination as to whom those airplanes might have belonged to. In addition, the gang at Cape Lisbourne were regularly treated to overflights from airplanes crossing the international date line from the west.
Occasionally, they would receive short cryptic radio messages from a U.S. airplane flying East from Alaska; sometime later an airplane with the same call sign would make another quick message while flying west; hours later a short message using the same call sign was made while flying east again.
U.S. overflight of the eastern Soviet Union?? Hhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmm!!
Jwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5288 times:
Nah, the US would never violate Soviet airspace
There are undoubtedly still strong forces in Siberia. Remember that the US was never the greatest enemy (at least over there, and despite the rethoric).
The greatest danger to Siberia comes from the south, from China.
There has been near constant fighting between Soviet/Russian forces and Chinese forces almost since the communist revolution in China.
These are not mere borderskirmishes but major battles involving troops in division strength and up on either side.
China also has a major force of nuclear weapons mounted on bombers capable of reaching the main cities of the USSR/Russia.
USAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5202 times:
Umm...Eielson Air Force Base is in Fairbanks, Alaska, which is south of the Arctic Circle and nowhere near the North Pole really...Im sure a -16 with full internal fuel and a couple of external tanks could reach Soviet/Russian airspace easily...
Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5180 times:
Eielson AFB was originally known as Mile 26 airstrip and was built as an emergency field for Ladd AFB which was in Fairbanks. Mile 26 is where the town of North Pole is located.
After the war in the 1950's B-36's and B-47's that SAC was flying couldn't used the Ladd landing strip because it was only 8500 feet and it couldn't be lengthened due to the Chena River passing right past both thresholds allready.
So what the Airforce did was take the old Mile 26 strip and lenghten it out to 14500 feet and move all of their facilities from Ladd AFB to the now named Eielson AFB.
The Army then took over Ladd and renamed it Fort Wainwright.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.