Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
QuestionsAbout Su37?  
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1355 times:

why sukhoi su37 does not use plasma-stealth ?


12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

because it does not exist/work? Has anyone seen or heard anything about it after that first much-hyped statement by some Ruskie official?

Sounded to me like "we can do better than you" without any substance.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1381 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1105 times:

I think we are still confusing the Sukhoi SU-37 Terminator, evolution of the Su-35 Flanker with the Sukhoi S-37 Berkut where the S stands for Simonov, the designer of the prototype.

Ciao

Stefano

P.S.
Plasma stealth is a fake


User currently offlineCobra27 From Slovenia, joined May 2001, 1011 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

BECAUSE plasma techonolgy is still under development
BUT it is a question if there will be enaugh money for this ambitius project.
PLASMA wll reduce drag and 99% reduce radar croos section


cobra27


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1095 times:

Honorable
Thank u about your note but I'm quite well informed about difference between the super agile su-37 super flanker ( or terminator ) & s-37 berkut ( the golden eagle ).
If mig 35(1.42) could use it why shouldn't su-37 also
use it.
Best regards
Fireblade

P.S.
I'll send u some links by e-mail


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

What u think could be an S-400 missile be
fit in to the su-37 armmament ( if they ever choose to produce the super flanker)?


User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1381 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1094 times:

Fireblade,
thanks for the e-mail with links.
So now I would ask why a conventional although advanced design like the SU-37 should use plasma-stealth? It would be better fitted (if it exists and works) on a purposely built new design. The S-37 itself looks to me less advanced than the Flanker: look at its fuselage, it doesn't have the blended wing body of the Flanker. Its overall design seems to be thought only to experiment the Forward swept wing.

Ciao

Stefano


User currently offlineSU508 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

Jwenting,

YES! If you actually bothered to go to some airshow and not sit on your but and write retarded comments like that, which are dictated by your ignorance!!!

Regards,


BBC_CCCP
RUS AF RULES!!!


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1087 times:

Can you share the links with the rest of us, please?

As for puting S-400's on the SU-37, aren't they a little too big?

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1082 times:

Where is the ignore button?


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

Steman
I'm (mostly) agree with u but stealth could give su-37 a big advantage in a fight( hard to find ,hard to kill ) and with an inside weapons & S-400 would be unbeatable at less 4 a two decades.
Yours
Fireblade


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

LY744
I'm very sorry about the links so I'm proclame them now"
http://www.areonautics.ru/plasmamain.htm
http://www.aeronautics.ru/mig142article.htm.
And about S-400 it could be lanch from the air
so this is the longest range AA
Best regards
Fireblade


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1076 times:

Thanks a lot for the links!
So, the S-400 can be used as an AA missile, very interesting. Did they try launching it from a/c yet? Can't wait to see the results!

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic QuestionsAbout Su37?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
SU37 Info posted Wed Apr 21 2004 23:26:00 by N685FE
QuestionsAbout Su37? posted Tue May 29 2001 16:57:30 by Fireblade

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format