Fireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 765 times:
Thank u about your note but I'm quite well informed about difference between the super agile su-37 super flanker ( or terminator ) & s-37 berkut ( the golden eagle ).
If mig 35(1.42) could use it why shouldn't su-37 also
Steman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1275 posts, RR: 8 Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 764 times:
thanks for the e-mail with links.
So now I would ask why a conventional although advanced design like the SU-37 should use plasma-stealth? It would be better fitted (if it exists and works) on a purposely built new design. The S-37 itself looks to me less advanced than the Flanker: look at its fuselage, it doesn't have the blended wing body of the Flanker. Its overall design seems to be thought only to experiment the Forward swept wing.
Fireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 751 times:
I'm (mostly) agree with u but stealth could give su-37 a big advantage in a fight( hard to find ,hard to kill ) and with an inside weapons & S-400 would be unbeatable at less 4 a two decades.