Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EADS, EPI Seek Damages Over A400M Engine  
User currently onlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12726 posts, RR: 25
Posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4120 times:

It seems the A400M fiasco has knock-on effects:

Quote:

The daily Financial Times Deutschland - citing EADS documents - said Thursday that the Airbus arm wants some euro500 million ($680 million) from EPI Europrop International GmbH. It said EPI wants euro425 million from the Airbus arm.

It says the dispute centers on who is to blame for lengthy delays to the troubled A400M program

Ref: http://www.kswo.com/global/story.asp?s=12122425


Inspiration, move me brightly!
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4087 times:

Well, I see EADS is far from finished in their quest to get more money for the A-400M program. The 500M Euro number is more than 25% of the money they are getting from the EU customer shakedown, oops I mean bailout. Now they are trying to shakedown EPI, when will they begin there shakedown attempt of US companies?

EADS has said the engine delays added about one year delay to the program that is delayed by more than four years, so is EADS 75% responsible for the delays?


User currently onlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12726 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4052 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
Well, I see EADS is far from finished in their quest to get more money for the A-400M program. The 500M Euro number is more than 25% of the money they are getting from the EU customer shakedown, oops I mean bailout. Now they are trying to shakedown EPI, when will they begin there shakedown attempt of US companies?

It's not clear to me if EADS started the process or if EADS is just countering EPI's claims.

In any case, it can't bode well for the "troubled A400M program (tm)".

There's a quote in the article from EPI saying "operationally it's business as usual."

Let's see, you are engaged in a serious dispute with your one and only customer, and your owners also have many other serious business relationships with your one and only customer, and it's business as usual, yes, operationally speaking?

If so, that's one strange business...



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4019 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 2):
If so, that's one strange business...

It seems that is the way EADS likes their relationships with both partners and customers.

Now they have the pipe dream of selling 179 KC-30s ($35B-$40B +) and 118 A-400Ms (at as yet an undisclosed price, but surely much higher than the C-17) to the USAF, and we should just accept their "business models" for pricing, overruns, delays and relationships?


User currently onlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7380 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3901 times:

Obviously EADS if they continue to build th eA400M requires an engine, so if they are successful, either the profits per frame goes up or the price to teh customer goes down. The penalty would be paid over time rather thna bankrupt the engine supplier, especially since spare etc. will be needed over the life of thr program.

Question would be if EADS is successful, how does this affect the funds being provided by the various governments or it matters only to EADS.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic EADS, EPI Seek Damages Over A400M Engine
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A400M Engine Europrop Reshuffle posted Sun Oct 7 2007 22:21:07 by JayinKitsap
Video Of A400M's TP400-D6 Engine posted Thu Jul 27 2006 20:20:04 by RAPCON
Eads Courting U.S. Suppliers For A400M Program posted Tue Oct 28 2003 01:48:32 by AvObserver
Eads Finally Launches A400M Transport posted Wed May 28 2003 23:59:18 by AvObserver
A400M Delays Feed C-130J Sales posted Sat Mar 6 2010 08:36:01 by Revelation
B-17 Over Round Rock, TX? posted Mon Feb 22 2010 07:14:58 by BWI5OH
Flying Formation Over Calgary Today At 1415 posted Sun Feb 21 2010 14:36:29 by etstar
A400M Talks In Final Round posted Fri Feb 19 2010 07:07:12 by Revelation
Eads - Lockheed Martin Strategic Deal? posted Sun Jan 31 2010 02:46:45 by Keesje
V-22 Osprey Over Puerto Rico? posted Sat Jan 23 2010 09:17:06 by Planedudea380

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format