Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Novel Way To Reduce Space Junk?  
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13194 posts, RR: 77
Posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4625 times:

Interesting idea, very low cost too.
With the ever increasing amounts of satellites and rocket stages in orbit, some solutions need examining.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8590103.stm

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3509 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 4454 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

makes too much sense and is too inexpensive to succeed. by that I mean not enough venders to scatter across the political spectrum for the voters.. now it this cost over $1 Billion with components from 30 states congress would be for it immediately   

User currently offlinekalvado From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 491 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

Doesn't look feasible to me.
Is it for new launches, or for already in-orbit components?
If it's a new-object feature... just one more system which may fail.
Booster stages are commonly left on elliptical orbits, so that they interact with atmosphere and re-enter some time after launch. For a satellite, it's just another system, which either need to be deployed as commanded at the end of lifecycle (if satellite is still under control at that stage!), or it would deploy at launch - and create extra drag and consume precious fuel on orbit.
Docking to uncontrollably flying objects.. that's an interesting one; however I doubt those plastic sails with controlled docking would be more cost effective than a small jet engine in a same package. After all, DARTs failed miserably, and conditions for junk pick-up going to be more harsh - so hypergolic engine is IMHO pretty much a must for docking. Would it be cheaper to put another 10 pounds of fuel? That's pennies on space scale, $50k or so. We don't need much thrust, we need total deltaV
Next, sail would work on relatively low orbits only as far as I understand. No GPS or earth-synchro orbit cleanup that way..
Pricetag - $10M per piece of junk, price of cheapest orbit delivery system by now. You cannot count on getting a piggy-back ride to required orbit every time..

Overall, I don't see that work. Not without very detailed mass-efficiency analysis at the very least.


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13194 posts, RR: 77
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 4084 times:

SSTL have a great record of pioneering small satellites since 1985, originally a small operation out of Surrey University in SE England, they gained a reputation for simplicity, innovation and gained a wide customer base including many governments.
Now part of EADS Astrium they are not an amateur operation and have a US branch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrey_Satellite_Technology_Ltd

www.sstl.co.uk

[Edited 2010-03-28 00:59:24]

User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2923 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4000 times:

I'm going to have to side with kalvado on this one. It's kind of like a hybrid car: An interesting and functional piece of technology to be sure, however it is akin to a band-aid over a bullet wound when dealing with the problem as a whole.


The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3950 times:

It will be good for de-orbiting new space junk, but existing junk, it would be expensive to intercept, attach to the junk, then de-orbit. I think a low power laser in space would be best, it could focus a beam on some junk, and push it lower so the atmosphere can grab it easier. Use solar panels, or maybe a nuclear reactor to power the laser. Too bad the ISS isnt in a higher orbit... you could add a module to it, use some of the ISS' power for the laser, and just pick stuff off when it comes into range.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A Novel Way To Reduce Space Junk?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Military: Plans To Fight Space Aliens? posted Thu May 4 2006 00:56:24 by AerospaceFan
Usaf Wants To Deploy Space Based Weapons posted Thu May 19 2005 00:17:01 by KC135TopBoom
Bring The Space Shuttle To NYC? posted Tue Mar 23 2010 06:42:00 by jfklganyc
Space Shuttle Journey To The Launchpad posted Thu Feb 18 2010 15:52:19 by alasdair1982
Air Force Space Plane To Fly Next April posted Tue Nov 24 2009 19:04:05 by ElpinDAB
What If The USN Reduce Carrier Fleet To 7 posted Thu Mar 26 2009 16:11:28 by 747400sp
Space Shuttle To Moon: Possible? posted Mon Sep 1 2008 20:46:20 by RG828
Space Shuttle Life To Be Extended? posted Sat Aug 30 2008 08:51:30 by JFKTOWERFAN
Space - What Would You Like To See? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 16:25:29 by RichardPrice
Sbirs Satellites To Detect ICBMs From Space posted Fri Aug 18 2006 05:51:42 by Wardialer

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format