Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Where The Tigers? Not Ready For Afghanistan?  
User currently offlineLumberton From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 4708 posts, RR: 20
Posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6870 times:

Just a few lines in this Aviation Week blog. The close cooperation between US and German forces doesn't surprise me, but what did startle me was this:

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest

Quote:
Up to 5,000 US troops are reinforcing the 4,500 German soldiers in northern Afghanistan. Guttenberg welcomed the availability of US combat helicopters. Germany is not ready to send its own Tiger combat helicopters to Afghanistan.

US helicopters already provided medical evacuation of German soldiers under fire on 2 April. During McChrystal's visit, Guttenberg awarded the Ehrenkreuz der Bundeswehr in Gold (Bundeswehr Cross of Honor in Gold) to 14 US helicopter crew members in their absence for this mission.

What are the issues with the Tigers? I would have thought this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to use these expensive machines and show what they can do.


"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13206 posts, RR: 77
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6639 times:

The French have deployed their Tigers to Afghanistan, I think their version was, with little modification, more suited to the role there.
While the German version was still more optimised for the original European theatre anti tank role?
Just a hunch, since France has long done extra NATO deployments, compared to Germany due to restraints on such things, they might always have had an eye on this role.
Who would have thought less than a decade ago German troops would even be in Afghanistan?

French Tigers in Afghanistan;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zVg5h9AUY8

[Edited 2010-04-23 11:07:28]

User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6621 times:

Quoting GDB (Reply 1):

I think your right GDB.

The German version lacked a cannon.

From wiki....

UH Tiger


Tiger UHT of the German Army
The UHT (from Unterstützungshubschrauber Tiger German for Support Helicopter Tiger) is a medium-weight multi-role fire support helicopter built for the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces).
The UHT can carry PARS 3 LR "fire and forget" and/or HOT3 anti-tank missiles as well as 70 mm Hydra air-to-ground fire support rockets. Four AIM-92 Stinger missiles (2 on each side) are mounted for air-to-air combat. Unlike the HAP/HCP version it has no integrated gun turret, but a 12.7 mm gunpod can be fitted if needed. The German Army decided against the French 30 mm GIAT cannon that is used on other Tiger versions because it was dissatisfied with the heavy recoil of this weapon. The upgrade of the UHT with the Rheinmetall RMK30, a 30 mm recoilless autocannon, is not yet clarified due to the budget.
Another noticeable difference with the HAP version is the use of a mast-mounted sight, which has second-generation infrared and CCD TV cameras. Countermeasures include radar/laser/missile launch/missile approach warning receivers and decoy launchers.

In August 2009, the German magazine Der Spiegel reported that the ten operational aircraft in the German Army are only suitable for pilot training, while others have not been accepted due to defects.[13]



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6484 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 6567 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 2):
The German version lacked a cannon.

This seems like a major oversight in retrospect.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineBladeLWS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 6509 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
This seems like a major oversight in retrospect.

Attack helo without a gun is worse than a fighter without a gun. What happens when you try to attack moving infantry with a missile and they scatter?


User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14026 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 6504 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
Quoting mffoda (Reply 2):
The German version lacked a cannon.

This seems like a major oversight in retrospect.

Up to the mid-1990s Germany had strict constitutional limits on deplying her troops broad, especially for combat missions. These limits were very much insisted upon by the Allies and our neighbours, fearing that we might start invading them again (e.g. one condition for the re-unification was the reduction of the number of German soldiers to 350000 maximum, due to the sudden combing of the former East and West German militaries we suddenly had almost a million soldiers in 1990. Similar reductions had to be carried out with the eqipment).
Before the collapse of East Germany the West German Bundeswehr was intended to act as a speed bump to hold up the Warsaw Pact forces long enough to allow American and Canadian re-inforcements to arrive in Europe. The Tiger was designed and ordered during this period , when the most likely enemy were massive armoured forces pouring through the Fulda Gap. Up to 10 years ago the Bundeswehr was never faced with the prospect of having to fight an ant-guerilla war.

Jan


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 6445 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
This seems like a major oversight in retrospect.

The Germans felt that the cannon as offered was unsatisfactory for a variety of issues.


User currently offlinesasd209 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Oct 2007, 642 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6313 times:

Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 6):
The Germans felt that the cannon as offered was unsatisfactory for a variety of issues.

Is it possible to retro-fit the French cannon or another cannon of the German choice? I'm sure the helicopter is capable without it, but surely it would be a nice addition? Is the 27MM Mauser that is used on the German navy vessels compatible?


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6128 times:

Quoting sasd209 (Reply 7):

Is it possible to retro-fit the French cannon or another cannon of the German choice? I'm sure the helicopter is capable without it, but surely it would be a nice addition? Is the 27MM Mauser that is used on the German navy vessels compatible?

The Germans were planning on using a Rheinmetall cannon, but there hasn't been much movement on that front. I think the primary issue was that the Germans were concerned over recoil of the French gun, so I doubt that the Mauser would be an acceptable substitute. The Germans do have a gun pod which is carried by a weapons pylon so that kinda deals with that situation.


User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4846 times:

"Germany suspends EADS helicopter purchase"

"None of the 11 Tiger helicopters delivered so far has been suitable for operational use or training, the report added."

"because of serious problems with the wiring"

I wonder if France is having these wiring problems as well? Does anyone know how they are working out in A-stan?

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp...RMDNC_0_-487856-1&sec=Worldupdates



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

Update:

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...d06dda-b328-4794-bd0b-5229fe04f06b

"The French Tigers are a different model - HAP - and have already been successfully deployed in Afghanistan ... although they too have this wiring problem. Christina Gotzhein, a spokeswoman for Eurocopter, told me that this wiring problem had been identified back in March 2009 and a service bulletin issued to the customers. The problem, she said, is that in certain circumstances wires touch each other but there are protective measures which can be taken. "The operational capability is not limited by these protective measures," she added, and no hint of difficulties has been mentioned by either the French army or the DGA French procurement agency."

Interesting; The wiring problem has been comfirmed by Eurocopter. But, the French army and procurement agency have not mentioned it.

Why would they be silent on this matter???  



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2129 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4389 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 10):
Why would they be silent on this matter???

Mabey the Germans were more particular to the quality of the product they are getting.

Mercedes vs Renault comes to mind.  

bikerthai



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3990 times:

Reading more into this, this is sounding more like the MH-90 situation; same 'program' but many sub models for different countries... sometimes defence cooperation isn't all its cracked up to be. Something about German Tigers having different sensors mounted in different locations, different weapons fit, different engine versions, and different ballistic protection levels. Sounds like a whole new helicopter.

User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (4 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3628 times:

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 11):

"France Demands Fix To Chafed Wires in Tiger Helo"

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4645401&c=EUR&s=AIR

I guess the French Army could no longer be silent on this matter...

"Tiger helicopters have flown more than 20,000 flight hours, without any flight incident from harnesses chafing," Eurocopter said.

Seems like Eurocopter is missing the point with the statement above... Remember the chafing problems of the early F-16's... Yeah... it was flying great up in till the point it crashed!!   



harder than woodpecker lips...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Where The Tigers? Not Ready For Afghanistan?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Could The CSeries Be Used For Military Tasks? posted Tue Oct 6 2009 19:44:42 by Alberchico
NSM Missile Ready For Production And Export posted Sat Apr 18 2009 05:50:57 by Mortyman
RAF Typhoons In Nevada/Ready For Air To Ground posted Tue Jul 1 2008 14:57:49 by GDB
Germany: Eurofighter Ready For QRA posted Thu Jan 24 2008 02:38:56 by TheSonntag
The EH-101 Repacement For Marine One - When? posted Sun Oct 29 2006 18:53:05 by Gh123
C17 Pickes Up Dutch Apaches For Afghanistan posted Wed Apr 12 2006 15:45:41 by Skippy777
Why Was The F-111 Not Called The B-111 posted Fri Feb 3 2006 19:40:15 by 747400sp
Where The Hell Is The Osprey? posted Tue May 3 2005 00:54:07 by KiwiNanday
Why Not Airbus For US Tanker Requirement: Answered posted Thu Jan 20 2005 22:24:16 by DL021
Did The 48th FW Deploy For "Enduring Freedom"? posted Thu Dec 27 2001 01:00:51 by CX747

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format