Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Does The Luftwaffe Keep The F-4's Around?  
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 11556 times:

I still see plenty of pics on here of Luftwaffe F-4''s, and I'm just wondering what role they serve when they have plenty of Tornado and Typhoon aircraft, the former especially having been well proven by now (that's not to insult the Typhoon, just to acknowledge that the Tornado has been around much longer). I'm not sure what capability the F-4 gives them other than maybe top end speed, but even then, it's surely got a much larger radar signature, fuel guzzler, probably can't run all the new toys, etc.

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinesasd209 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Oct 2007, 642 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 11395 times:

Because they are beautiful A/C of course!  
I wonder this myself, surely they must be among the last 2-3? active users of the Phantom? I'm thinking that perhaps Greece and Iran are still using them and the JASDF retired them only recently?


User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 4680 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 11210 times:

Quoting LHCVG (Thread starter):
Quoting sasd209 (Reply 1):

Germany uses the F-4 in the air-to-air role. Due to the slow introduction of the Eurofighter, it is still around, but should be gone completely in two or three years. And remember, in the 1990s Germany updated the F-4s with the APG-65 radar (also used on the F-18) and since then, it can employ ANRAAM missiles.

The Tornado was intended as a fighter bomber and therefore, it didn't replace the F-4 completely.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlinetripledelta From Croatia, joined Jul 2004, 1120 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 11210 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting sasd209 (Reply 1):
I'm thinking that perhaps Greece and Iran are still using them and the JASDF retired them only recently?

Turkey uses them too, with theirs having been upgraded by IAI to a higher standard with some modern avionics.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Thomas Kraemer




No plane, no gain.
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 11208 times:

For years the Phantoms were Germany primary fighter aircraft and have had several upgrades over the years. They have received the radar of the F/A 18 Hornet and are pretty good in BVR range interceptions.
The Tornado is the fighter/bomber of the German Air Force and only used in air to ground missions. The Tornado therefore could never replace the Phantom although it was briefly intended to do so.
The Typhoon is not combat ready yet, although being used on some QRA missions. The Phantom will continue to be in the fleet till 2015 maybe even longer.

Tthe Phantom was only acquired as an interim solution till the Tornado would be ready, but as it came clear that the Tornado would be a terrible fighter aircraft the decision was made to keep it a while longer. Since the Eurofighter is also delayed (it was once called "Fighter 90") the Phantoms stayed in the fleet for almost 40 years now. Not too bad for an short term interim solution 



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1067 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 11110 times:

Why keep them.... Mercedes... BMW... MTU... etc. etc. Those Germans are pretty good mechanics  

I'll bet those aircraft are maintained like NEW!



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 11110 times:

Doesn't Israel, Japan, and Egypt also still fly the F-4? If they do, that brings the number of countries still flying her to 7, being Germany, Japan, Israel, Greece, Egypt, Turkey, and Iran.

User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1546 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 11026 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 2):
And remember, in the 1990s Germany updated the F-4s with the APG-65 radar (also used on the F-18) and since then, it can employ ANRAAM missiles.

I had forgotten that upgrade, so indeed that would be great for BVR ops.

Quoting mffoda (Reply 5):
Why keep them.... Mercedes... BMW... MTU... etc. etc. Those Germans are pretty good mechanics

I'll bet those aircraft are maintained like NEW!

I bet! That's always been my joke about the old East German MiG's -- that they might not be Western a/c, but you can bet they were in the best shape of anybody's around the world! I guess too after forty-ish years they have all the particulars for the F-4's down to a science, so greater mx requirements is probably a minor issue.


User currently offlinemechatnew From United States of America, joined May 2005, 101 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 10916 times:

South Korea still has a good number of F-4D/Es flying in the fighter/bomber role, and RF-4C for recon.

User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11446 posts, RR: 76
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 10815 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Because:

They're paid for.

They are good missile carrying interceptors and can launch AMRAAMs with the best of them.

They have good electronics upgrades.

They're fast (still) and fit Germany's stated need for an interceptor as well as any available interim aircraft would while they're waiting on the Tornado ADF.

Besides.....who's gonna send fighters into attack Germany now?



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3523 posts, RR: 29
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 10798 times:

I think the others have pretty much covered it all. The Phantom is the interim solution until the Eurofighter replaces it finally in 2012. It is still used because it does the job, and the Eurofighter was delayed.

Interesting for me is the fact that the Phantoms were used to defend the airspace of a Baltic state, something where they actually came quite close to russian SU-27s some years ago.


User currently onlinewalter2222 From Belgium, joined Sep 2005, 1293 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 10797 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 6):
Doesn't Israel, Japan, and Egypt also still fly the F-4? If they do, that brings the number of countries still flying her to 7, being Germany, Japan, Israel, Greece, Egypt, Turkey, and Iran.
Quoting mechatnew (Reply 8):
South Korea still has a good number of F-4D/Es flying in the fighter/bomber role, and RF-4C for recon.

Showing the flags of the countries still flying the Phantom (back in 2008):


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Walter Van Bel



Best regards,

Walter



canon 340d ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l is usm - ...
User currently offlineAvro7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 10545 times:

wikipedia actually lists the number of Phantom II's still in use at well over 400, quite plausible.

User currently offlinesasd209 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Oct 2007, 642 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 10439 times:

Quoting walter2222 (Reply 11):
Showing the flags of the countries still flying the Phantom (back in 2008):

Well, I guess I was off by a few.  


User currently offlinesovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2578 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 9871 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't forget USAF still uses them. Yes they are drones but hey they still fly right ?  

User currently offlineBongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3536 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 9773 times:

Quoting columba (Reply 4):
Tthe Phantom was only acquired as an interim solution till the Tornado would be ready, but as it came clear that the Tornado would be a terrible fighter aircraft the decision was made to keep it a while longer.

I wasn't aware that West Germany as it then was ever considered to ADV version of the Tornado. The ADV was purely a UK aircraft, subsequently exported to Saudi Arabia, and leased to Italy.
Whilst it was not a dog fighting fighter aircraft in the mould of the F16, or F15 it possessed long legs which suited the UK requirement for covering the gap between Iceland and Norway. It was however a good generation newer and superior to the F4.

In hindsight the ADV Tornado might have been a good move for Germany, especially as its now been available and in service for over 20 years, whilst they continue to upgrade and try to keep their Phantoms in the air. Of course though when the decision to stick with the Phantom and not for the Tornado was made probably in 1980 or thereabouts, I'm sure they had no intention of operating them for another 30 years.

As to it being a "terrible fighter aircraft" the only major problem I can recall was with the foxhunter radar. The early RAF examples being given the "blue circle" designation due to the nose having a concrete block instead of a radar system (Blue circle is a major UK brand of cement)


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 9598 times:

Quoting sovietjet (Reply 14):
Don't forget USAF still uses them. Yes they are drones but hey they still fly right ?

Perhaps, but the QF-4C/D/E/J fighters are not considered as "active" USAF or USN aircraft. Those that fly with pilots aboard are flown by contractors, not active duty pilots.

Quoting Bongodog1964 (Reply 15):
As to it being a "terrible fighter aircraft" the only major problem I can recall was with the foxhunter radar.

The F-4 is still a very good fighter and is still very good with the advorsaries it had back in it's hayday. There are still plenty of Mig-21/-23 fighters out there the F-4 can easily match up with.


User currently offlineMarcus From Mexico, joined Apr 2001, 1781 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 9578 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 10):
Interesting for me is the fact that the Phantoms were used to defend the airspace of a Baltic state, something where they actually came quite close to russian SU-27s some years ago.

Did not know about this....can you please elaborate?



Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
User currently offlineAnt72LBA From United Kingdom, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 414 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9470 times:

Quoting Marcus (Reply 17):
Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 10):
Interesting for me is the fact that the Phantoms were used to defend the airspace of a Baltic state, something where they actually came quite close to russian SU-27s some years ago.

Did not know about this....can you please elaborate?

NATO Baltic Air Patrol - Wikipedia details the various Air Forces that have been involved. Presume this is what TheSonntag is referring to.


User currently offlineOV735 From Estonia, joined Jan 2004, 909 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9465 times:

Quoting Marcus (Reply 17):
Interesting for me is the fact that the Phantoms were used to defend the airspace of a Baltic state, something where they actually came quite close to russian SU-27s some years ago.

Did not know about this....can you please elaborate?

The Baltic Air Policing is a rotating mission between NATO members, whereby four fighters are based in Siauliai (Lithuania) for four months. Luftwaffe has carried the role three times (2005, 2008, 2009), twice with Phantoms and once with the Typhoon. Currently it's Poland's third rotation with MiG-29s.

The mission itself is more of a friendly pat on the back for the Baltic states, rather than an actual deterrent, as the location of the base leaves some parts of the Baltic States out of operational range, and the chain of command is much too long for an actual engagement to happen in a timely manner. In 2005, during Luftwaffe's first watch, a Russian Su-27 operating a recon sortie, crashed in Lithuania, well before the Phantoms could even take off.


User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3523 posts, RR: 29
Reply 20, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 9311 times:

Quoting Ant72LBA (Reply 18):
NATO Baltic Air Patrol - Wikipedia details the various Air Forces that have been involved.

Correct, thats what I meant.

Regarding the initial plan to use the F-4, the F-4F germany uses initially was a downgraded F-4E, designed for dogfighting only, with the Sparrow capability removed. It was intended for use in the German short range cold war theater only.

Only when it became apparrent the F-4 was to be used longer, it finally got upgraded with the ICE programme, thus being able to use AMRAAMs.


User currently offlinemechatnew From United States of America, joined May 2005, 101 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 9236 times:

The USAF Drone Phantoms, QF-4Es, and the first QRF-4Cs are flown by a mix of Active duty, and contract pilots.

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9008 times:

Quoting mechatnew (Reply 21):
The USAF Drone Phantoms, QF-4Es, and the first QRF-4Cs are flown by a mix of Active duty, and contract pilots.

Thanks, I had thought they were only flown with contractor crews.


User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3523 posts, RR: 29
Reply 23, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 8921 times:

Quoting mechatnew (Reply 21):
The USAF Drone Phantoms, QF-4Es, and the first QRF-4Cs are flown by a mix of Active duty, and contract pilots.

Sorry if this question sounds stupid, but what exactly are Drone Phantoms used for? I mean when they are used as a target, they obviously are unmanned, and I do understand that test, but what is the purpose of using drones? Testing radars and other avionics?


User currently offlinemechatnew From United States of America, joined May 2005, 101 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 8747 times:

The drones are used for many different testing missions, and most of the flights are manned. Only when live missles are being used against it, is it unmanned.

25 Breiz : Just curious about an apparent contradiction. Are they still regarded as drones when manned?
26 mechatnew : The Phantoms have the QF-4E/G or QRF-4C designnation , and considered drones because on all the modifications for unmanned flight. When the QF-100Ds,
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Does The Luftwaffe Keep The F-4's Around?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Does The A-7 Have That Weird Wing? posted Thu Jun 17 2004 01:20:11 by Mirrodie
Why No Cannons On The Mustang? posted Thu Jul 30 2009 01:47:43 by ThirtyEcho
Would The Luftwaffe Buy American Aircrafts? posted Wed Jan 30 2008 07:21:07 by LHStarAlliance
Why Does Usaf Keep Aircraft For So Long? posted Mon Oct 8 2007 20:46:27 by QFA380
RAH-66 Commanche-Why Can't It Replace The Apache? posted Sun May 13 2007 05:12:53 by AirRyan
Does LM Have The Right Answer? posted Sat Feb 3 2007 17:22:34 by KC135TopBoom
Why Not A B-736 For The Army's Sigint? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 01:57:52 by DEVILFISH
Why Would Israel Want The Dhruv. posted Sat Jan 29 2005 11:21:45 by HAWK21M
Why No Winglets On The Air Force One? posted Mon Aug 16 2004 09:03:19 by Squirrel83
Why Did Canada Choose The F-18? posted Tue Feb 17 2004 10:35:53 by Vio
Why Does The A-7 Have That Weird Wing? posted Thu Jun 17 2004 01:20:11 by Mirrodie
Why No Cannons On The Mustang? posted Thu Jul 30 2009 01:47:43 by ThirtyEcho
Why Does Usaf Keep Aircraft For So Long? posted Mon Oct 8 2007 20:46:27 by QFA380
RAH-66 Commanche-Why Can't It Replace The Apache? posted Sun May 13 2007 05:12:53 by AirRyan
Does LM Have The Right Answer? posted Sat Feb 3 2007 17:22:34 by KC135TopBoom
Why Not A B-736 For The Army's Sigint? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 01:57:52 by DEVILFISH
Why Would Israel Want The Dhruv. posted Sat Jan 29 2005 11:21:45 by HAWK21M
Why No Winglets On The Air Force One? posted Mon Aug 16 2004 09:03:19 by Squirrel83
Why Did Canada Choose The F-18? posted Tue Feb 17 2004 10:35:53 by Vio

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format