Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Kawasaki XP-1 As YS-11 Replacement  
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Posted (4 years 7 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 7793 times:

Latest news from Flightglobal cites at least four potential suppliers for the JASDF YS-11 replacement program --- with Mitsubishi's MRJ getting prominent mention.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...japans-ys-11-replacement-need.html

Quote:
"The Japanese air force, navy and coastguard have a future requirement for regional aircraft to replace their ageing fleets of NAMC YS-11 turboprops.

Japanese authorities acknowledge there is a need to start replacing the assets, say industry sources involved in the sale of regional aircraft.

'There is some small movement in the ministry of defence to phase out the YS-11s,' says one. 'I don't know when they plan to phase out the YS-11s, but the physical condition of the aircraft will decide it.'

[.....]

Flightglobal's MiliCAS database says the average age of Japan's YS-11 fleet is 40 years. The air force has 13, the navy 10 and the coastguard three, it adds."


Conspicuous by its absence is Kawasaki's XP-1.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Terlouw
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Esa Kaihlanen


What could be wrong with this purpose-built military prototype originally intended for those missions that now, civilian prop and jet designs are being considered for adaption in its stead? Number of engines, propulsion type, or some other aspects in its development?

[Edited 2010-05-26 17:47:00]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4728 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7669 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
What could be wrong with this purpose-built military prototype originally intended for those missions that now, civilian prop and jet designs are being considered for adaption in its stead? Number of engines, propulsion type, or some other aspects in its development?

The XP-1 is a P-3 replacement. It would be way too much plane to replace the YS-11. Just my two cents.



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4007 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7657 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 1):

Exactly.

YS-11 MTOW, 52,000 lbs.
P-1 MTOW, 176,000 lbs.

Peter 



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7543 times:

That said given the cost of developing the aircraft - just to meet domestic reqs - it is possibly a natural replacement solution. Also till Japan got the EP-3s they used to use YS-11s in the ELINT/SIGINT roles and I think this plane with its endurance and floorspace/MTOW increase is a natural for that role (should the JSDF choose to resuscitate it)

check out this Japanese web site - it has lots of CGI images of the different P-1 variations imagined/possible

http://www.heinkel.jp/yspack/ysf_p1_eng.html


here's a pic of the ELINT configured YS_11

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4059/4378653440_72bb0f8566_o.jpg



Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 7481 times:

And also it will be very very useful supplying far flung bases in the chitose - minami torishima - okinawa triangle. The max range of the YS-11 was 2,200km and less still - full load. The P-1 will enable not just the full complement of pax but also a meaningful luggage/freight ratio to be ferried between these bases freeing up larger capital assets.


Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 7370 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 1):
The XP-1 is a P-3 replacement. It would be way too much plane to replace the YS-11. Just my two cents.
Quoting ptrjong (Reply 2):
Quoting A342 (Reply 1):

Exactly.

YS-11 MTOW, 52,000 lbs.
P-1 MTOW, 176,000 lbs.

As you said in a previous thread.....

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 12):
The P-1 doesn't look like a heavy, but these are not small aircraft. alert
Kawasaki XP-1 (by Lindy Field Dec 11 2008 in Military Aviation & Space Flight)?threadid=100392&searchid=100704&s=xp-1#ID100704

Was aware of the size and weight differences, hence the reference to the number of engines. My point is if it was their design goal to field a bigger aircraft than the YS-11 possibly to overcome the latter's size and power limitations, range and time on station.

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 3):
Also till Japan got the EP-3s they used to use YS-11s in the ELINT/SIGINT roles and I think this plane with its endurance and floorspace/MTOW increase is a natural for that role

        

This may also apply.....

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...eillance-aircraft-for-finland.html

Quote:
"DENVER --- Lockheed Martin announced today that it has been awarded a four-year contract to supply the Finnish Air Force with an airborne surveillance system and associated ground systems. The value of this contract is approximately $100 million.

'Lockheed Martin is honored to work with the Finnish Air Force,' said John Mengucci, President of Lockheed Martin Information Systems & Global Services-Defense. 'We intend to provide the Air Force Command with a highly capable system that fulfils their dynamic airborne intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operational requirements.'

Under this contract, Lockheed Martin's team will modify an EADS CASA C-295 turboprop aircraft to accommodate an advanced surveillance system. A key attribute of the system will be an open and modular architecture to allow future system upgrades to be easily added and readily reconfigured to support evolving mission needs.'



I guess the ATR 42-500 (or the upcoming update) would be fine for coastal patrols and search and rescue, in conjunction with the requested replacements for the UH-60Js..

[Edited 2010-05-27 15:08:24]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4728 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 7362 times:

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 3):
here's a pic of the ELINT configured YS_11

Does that YS-11 have GE T64 engines or am I seeing things?!? Never knew about that version...

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 4):
And also it will be very very useful supplying far flung bases in the chitose - minami torishima - okinawa triangle.

The runway at Minami Torishima is rather short, only 1372m, according to worldaerodata, so that could be "interesting" (I'm aware of the 2250m figure on the English wikipedia page, but that is definitely wrong).



Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 7299 times:

Quoting A342 (Reply 6):
Does that YS-11 have GE T64 engines or am I seeing things?!?

Yes thats correct - the ES Y-11 were modified towards the end of the YS-11s production run and the RR darts were changed to the Allison T64-IHI-10J to make a "super YS-11" if you want to call it that.

Quoting A342 (Reply 6):
The runway at Minami Torishima is rather short, only 1372m

Yes i know worldaero says its 1372 but methinks they're wrong on 2 counts

1) The wikipedia source (AIS Japan) is a run by the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and has a government IP address (https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/) presumably they should know their own country better

2) Since i didn't want to rely on them either i took out my foot rule and measured the runway on the 1/25,000 map of torishima by the Geographical survey of Japan and it measured 84mm which multiplied by 25,000 gives us 2100 meters which is closer to the higher figures quoted on the internet.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 5):
Lockheed Martin's team will modify an EADS CASA C-295 turboprop aircraft to accommodate an advanced surveillance system
Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 5):
I guess the ATR 42-500 (or the upcoming update) would be fine for coastal patrols

Ja i was thinking of the same thing - especially given that the ATR is used by the Guarda Costeria in the same role and the C-295 has been at it for quite some time now. I guess it will depend on the Japanese calculation of costs with regards to many factors - domestic vs foreign, new plane type vs existent plane type, fuel economy of twin engine turboprop VS cost of a new spares reserve etc etc etc.



Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineAraiguma From Japan, joined Feb 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7257 times:

JASDF
2 YS-11EA for Electoric Warfare
4 YS-11EB for ELINT
3 YS-11FC for Flight Checker
1 YS-11NT for Navigation Trainer
3 YS-11P for Passenger/VIP Transport

JMSDF
2 YS-11M for Freighter
2 YS-11M-A for Freighter
6 YS-11T-A for MPA trainer

JASDF & JMSDF YS-11 replacement program have no move yet, but some Japanese military source says JASDF is considering modified XC-2 replaces YS-11EB.

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 4):
And also it will be very very useful supplying far flung bases in the chitose - minami torishima - okinawa triangle. The max range of the YS-11 was 2,200km and less still - full load. The P-1 will enable not just the full complement of pax but also a meaningful luggage/freight ratio to be ferried between these bases freeing up larger capital assets.

YS-11 should drop by Iwojima to refuel to go to Minamitorisihima because of its range.
JMSDF operates YS-11 once a week to supply there, and JASDF C-130H goes to there once a month but there is no altanative airport under bad weather condition so flexibility of those mission are very limited. It will be useful more long range aircraft like XP-1/XC-2.

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 7):
Yes i know worldaero says its 1372 but methinks they're wrong on 2 counts

1) The wikipedia source (AIS Japan) is a run by the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and has a government IP address (https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/) presumably they should know their own country better

2) Since i didn't want to rely on them either i took out my foot rule and measured the runway on the 1/25,000 map of torishima by the Geographical survey of Japan and it measured 84mm which multiplied by 25,000 gives us 2100 meters which is closer to the higher figures quoted on the internet.

According to GSI 1/25.000 map or Google Earth or even Wikipedia(Japanese), Minamitorishima runaway is 1372m. I think you should try again.

GSI (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan)
http://watchizu.gsi.go.jp/watchizu.html?b=241715&l=1535848

Wikipedia(Japanese)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8D%...8%88%AA%E7%A9%BA%E5%9F%BA%E5%9C%B0


User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 7243 times:

Quoting Araiguma (Reply 8):
According to GSI 1/25.000 map or Google Earth or even Wikipedia(Japanese), Minamitorishima runaway is 1372m. I think you should try again

1) You are absolutely right - 1400 thats what i'm getting of your map - but if you try the map i posted above (also GSI) i'm getting 2100 - see this site here http://www.gsi.go.jp/WNEW/LATEST/special00-01-Nhigashi.htm

2) Cant get torishima on google maps/earth - pls cud you help with this since my hiragana/katakana sucks - my kanji skills are non existant - and the romaji search gets me nowhere.

thanks



Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineAraiguma From Japan, joined Feb 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7223 times:

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 9):
1) You are absolutely right - 1400 thats what i'm getting of your map - but if you try the map i posted above (also GSI) i'm getting 2100 - see this site here http://www.gsi.go.jp/WNEW/LATEST/spe...i.htm

I think this image size is not correct scale.

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 9):
2) Cant get torishima on google maps/earth - pls cud you help with this since my hiragana/katakana sucks - my kanji skills are non existant - and the romaji search gets me nowhere.

I find coordinates, 24.283753,153.980076. Try this.


User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7217 times:

Quoting Araiguma (Reply 10):

I find coordinates, 24.283753,153.980076. Try this.




Thanks - Yep you and A342 are correct - its around the 1400 meter mark



Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7192 times:

Quoting Araiguma (Reply 8):
JASDF
2 YS-11EA for Electoric Warfare
4 YS-11EB for ELINT
3 YS-11FC for Flight Checker
1 YS-11NT for Navigation Trainer
3 YS-11P for Passenger/VIP Transport

JMSDF
2 YS-11M for Freighter
2 YS-11M-A for Freighter
6 YS-11T-A for MPA trainer

JASDF & JMSDF YS-11 replacement program have no move yet, but some Japanese military source says JASDF is considering modified XC-2 replaces YS-11EB.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Katsunori Kimura


Could we assume then that the P-1 is being considered for the remaining roles (EW, FC, NT & P), while the XC-2 would take that (ELINT) on and the pure freighter mission? Perhaps they might also do a tanker version later.

Quoting Shmertspionem (Reply 3):
That said given the cost of developing the aircraft - just to meet domestic reqs - it is possibly a natural replacement solution.

Yes. Blowing away $2B just to retain the knowledge as put forth before doesn't sound so convincing anymore, even if it was Japan doing it, especially in this economic climate. I take the linked report at the thread's start as an effort to promote the MRJ, perhaps to gain additional development funding and a captive customer. It may also be the Government's way of introducing competition to ensure quality and to keep prices fair.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7144 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 12):
especially in this economic climate.

We really don't know - the problem is we don't have good English sources on Japan. Till now all of us have been speculating as to the most likely options. Problem is Japan has always maintained an independent defence production capacity - knowing full well that it is uneconomical. This was policy even during the worst period of the late 80's bubble burst at the end of Yasuhiro Nakasone's premiership. This current downturn is a mere footnote compared to what happened in the late 80s.

We will never know unless we analyse the tone and tenor of the Japanese newspapers on this subject.

Araiguma San cud u please enlighten us on this subject? is it discussed in the press ? any hints - indications?



Vi veri universum vivus vici
User currently offlineAraiguma From Japan, joined Feb 2010, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6988 times:

Japanese media tendency about XP-1/XC-2 program is comparatively affirmative. I think there is some reasons;

1) This program is require low budget compared to the other program like A400M or P-8 MPA.
2) Domestic aircraft program like YS-11, C-1, T-2/F-1, T-4, OH-1 were always thought as necessary expenses to develop competitiveness in the world. Most Japanese people think the manufacturing industry is still our economical basis, so bad economy is not the reason to quit domestic aircraft program.
3) XP-1/XC-2 is the first domestic military aircraft program being taken into consideration to entry into commercial market from the beginning.


User currently offlineShmertspionem From India, joined Aug 2006, 453 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (4 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 6960 times:

Quoting Araiguma (Reply 14):
so bad economy is not the reason to quit domestic aircraft program.

Thanks

Devilfish - i think we have our answer here - as i suspected especially since Japan has been in recovery and Hatoyama chickened out on all his major promised reforms, we can expect him to follow past policy.



Vi veri universum vivus vici
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Kawasaki XP-1 As YS-11 Replacement
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
V-22 As A C-2 Greyhound Replacement? posted Wed Nov 11 2009 20:30:02 by 747400sp
Boeing C-17C As C-5 Galaxy Replacement? posted Fri Oct 10 2008 06:27:49 by Keesje
CC 150 Polaris Replacement? posted Tue May 18 2010 23:25:09 by columba
Space Shuttle Takeoff Sequence As Seen By Me. posted Tue May 18 2010 17:23:48 by eksath
Searching For Four Ex Japanese Coast Guard YS-11´s posted Sun May 16 2010 07:01:27 by MHG
Ngad For Super Hornet Replacement? posted Fri May 7 2010 10:25:54 by Devilfish
AVX Offers Alternative To OH-58 Replacement posted Sun Apr 25 2010 21:37:27 by sonic67
Polish Replacement Air Force One? posted Tue Apr 13 2010 07:24:12 by KochamLOT
French Buy C-235s As A400M "Stop Gap" Measure posted Sun Apr 4 2010 07:50:59 by Lumberton
Will There Ever Be A Replacement For The E-2? posted Fri Apr 2 2010 03:34:11 by 747400sp
Boeing C-17C As C-5 Galaxy Replacement? posted Fri Oct 10 2008 06:27:49 by Keesje
A4M And Mig-29 Replacement Aircraft. posted Sun Feb 26 2012 18:16:55 by L-188
Q400/Elta To Make P-3 Replacement posted Mon Dec 5 2011 09:56:15 by JoeCanuck
C17 At DTW 11-12-11 Why? posted Sat Nov 12 2011 10:20:13 by falstaff
Air Force One And Orlando 10/11/11? posted Sun Oct 9 2011 20:59:24 by Plainplane
SF Fleetweek "11 Question posted Thu Sep 29 2011 10:15:10 by as739x
Prince Harry Back In Afghan War As Apache Pilot. posted Thu Jun 16 2011 03:01:01 by bjorn14
New RAF A330 Mrtt As VIP Aircraft? posted Fri Apr 29 2011 14:12:19 by Bthebest

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format