Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Saab Gripen Slightly Underpowered?  
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3118 times:

Looking at the thrust of the 404 (8 kN) and the empty & MTOW it looks like Gripen is not a very high powered fighter. (comapred to mig 29, F16, F18, etc.)

Although it probably is an excellent aircraft, doesn't this translate itself in average climb rate, limited sustained speed in high AOA dog fights and perhaps limited ordenance when operating from roads ?

With a 10/11 kN engine it probably would have a much better "jagt" performance.


7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3039 times:

Comparing Gripen and F18, Gripen has both an empty weight and MTOW about half of the F18's. Since they share the same basic engine, their thrust to weight ratio should be about the same depending on the version of the F18.
Also, considering it's a single engine jet, it will need to carry less fuel for it's operations than a twin engine a/c that weighs twice as much.
What I've heard, it has pretty impressive climb performance, and short runways don't seem to be much of a problem even at high take-off weights. It's also an unstable a/c which gives it very good turning performance.

Regards,

Staffan


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2952 times:

Thrust alone isn't everything either.
Aerodynamic shape has a lot to do with it, and Gripen's shape is more advanced than that of earlier generation aircraft.
Then there's mission. Gripen's designated primary mission might not require as much thrust as that of the F-16.
etc. etc.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2927 times:

Having a lighter engine will require to use the afterburner more often e.g. during take-off. This is bad for range.

F16 is about a light as Gripen. F18 is heavier but not twice as . .

It could easy lose the initiative in dogfights if oposing fighter is a e.g. mig29.


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2904 times:

What numbers do you have for their respective weights and thrusts?

Thanks,

Staffan


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2763 times:

http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/gripen/
says 54KN, 80.5KN with reheat.
empty weight 5700kg, TOW in AA config 8500kg, MTOW 14000kg.

F-16A (according to a book I have):
66.5KN, 108.1KN with reheat
empty weight 6900kg, AA profile 10600kg, MTOW 17000kg

F/A-18A (different book):
2x 77KN
empty weight 9900kg, AA config 15700kg, MTOW 23500kg

According to another source, the engines of the F/A-18 are 86-91KN each and that of the Gripen 81.5 (not 80.5).

Note that my data on the F-16 and F/A-18 isn't the latest. Engine upgrades may have increased their thrust ratings (and MTOW probably).



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2738 times:

The good thing about Gripen is that no Swedish made fighter been involved in any fighting since 1960ies and Congo, with the flying barrel! That´s pretty impressive I think....



User currently offlineAtenara From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 93 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2651 times:

Hey, at least it's better than the Philippine Air Force F-5A freedom fighters.
like they say for the Philippines, all air but no force.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Saab Gripen Slightly Underpowered?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photos And Video Of First SA Gripen posted Thu Sep 21 2006 01:13:58 by DEVILFISH
Saab 2000 Awacs posted Thu Jun 22 2006 13:38:01 by Alessandro
Hungary Gets First JAS Gripen's posted Sat Apr 1 2006 07:41:25 by KrisYYZ
Slightly OT: New Class 45 Destroyer Launched posted Wed Feb 1 2006 19:50:38 by WhiteHatter
Gripen For Denmark -- The Future Has Arrived posted Fri Jan 6 2006 16:34:42 by Columba
Saab J-350E "Draken" For Sell posted Tue Dec 27 2005 14:55:03 by PETER05
Gripen Engine posted Fri Apr 29 2005 09:08:41 by N77014
Spectacular Gripen Video posted Sat Feb 5 2005 23:00:42 by Boeing4ever
First Czech Gripen posted Sat Oct 23 2004 15:34:31 by Vzlet
JAS Gripen Sold To Thailand? posted Fri Oct 8 2004 16:21:02 by Alessandro

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format