Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Plane With Michelle Obama Had To Abort Landing  
User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3091 posts, RR: 4
Posted (3 years 8 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 4851 times:

I guess her airplane didn't have the required spacing behind a C-17.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...LC7D_story.html?wpisrc=al_national

Fair use from the article: The Federal Aviation Administration, already dealing with a series of controversies involving controllers sleeping and watching a movie on the job, on Tuesday sent a team of investigators to the Warrenton radar control center where the mistake was made. The First Lady was returning from a television appearance and other events with Jill Biden in New York and was aboard a Boeing 737 that is part of the presidential fleet of jets when the error occurred on final approach to Andrews. The controllers in the tower at Andrews recognized that the massive C-17 and Obama flight designated EXEC1F, a classification for a plane carrying members of the president’s family, were far too close when the Warrenton controller handed off responsibility for the two aircraft.

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGalaxy5007 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 8 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4509 times:

This is really a non news story; CNN is just now breaking news on this (which happened yesterday) and again, its a non issue. The aircraft were 3 miles apart when the first ladys plane were notified to circle the airfield; it happens all the time in the civil world. The only reason why its news is because it probably delayed Obamas landing by 5 minutes....whoopdee do!

User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (3 years 8 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4447 times:

CNN and Eliot Spitzer (client #9) are skewering FAA right now. And they have some idiot named Michael Goldfarb who used to be the Chief of Staff at the FAA who is throwing around terms like "harrowing experience for the first lady and Dr. Biden" and saying that they must have been fearful when the plane was making typical S turns, and that 3 miles is "dangerously close."

User currently offlineJohnM From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 8 months 4 days ago) and read 4350 times:

I knew the article was BS when it referred to the C-17 as "massive".......

User currently offlineWESTERN737800 From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 693 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4064 times:

Quoting Galaxy5007 (Reply 1):
This is really a non news story;

Exactly! Anyone who has flown for any length of time has had to do their share of go-arounds, big deal! I've done several go-arounds over the years. I've seen several other people do go-arounds and nobody called the press! What they fail to realize is that go-arounds can actually enchance safety.



Bring back Western Airlines!
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12178 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4059 times:

It is obiously the C-17's fault.

Or did another Controller fall asleep in the RAPCON?


User currently offlinefxramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7359 posts, RR: 85
Reply 6, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4059 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Galaxy5007 (Reply 1):
This is really a non news story;

It's just fuel to the fire given the recent news about 8 controllers getting busted for various issues.


User currently onlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 7625 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4046 times:

So are we heading for the Republican President to pull another fire all the controllers to set another example?
Ooops, my bad, current president is a Democrat, I'm lost, too early  


User currently offlinecargotanker From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 164 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3967 times:

I wonder why the Andrews controllers didn't send the C-17 around and let the C-40 land? Clearly the C-40 would have a higher priority and Andrews tower knew the First Lady was on board. Maybe the C-17 was already on the ground and the C-40 on three mile final? Not enought time to let the C-17 clear the runway?

User currently offlineCALPilot From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 999 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3959 times:

Quoting cargotanker (Reply 8):
I wonder why the Andrews controllers didn't send the C-17 around and let the C-40 land? Clearly the C-40 would have a higher priority and Andrews tower knew the First Lady was on board. Maybe the C-17 was already on the ground and the C-40 on three mile final? Not enought time to let the C-17 clear the runway?

Because protocol is for the lower/lead aircraft have priority of the runway. As cat3 and others said this was a non event. cat3, you are right,,, this Michael Goldfarb is a total tool.


User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2843 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3927 times:

NPR said they had to "Wave off" the first lady's plane. I guess Andrews is a navy carrier now.


The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlinecargotanker From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 164 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

Quoting CALPilot (Reply 9):
Because protocol is for the lower/lead aircraft have priority of the runway.

Yes, given the two aircraft are of equal importance. Andrews AFB and the President's family are a different story. Andrews routinely shuts down ALL movement on the ramp as well as departures and arrivals if AF1 or AF2 are taking off/landing. It seems odd to me having transited Andrews numerous times that the C-17 is allowed to continue while Exec1Foxtrot has to do a pattern. That being said, the attention level of this is absolutely ridiculous.


User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8759 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3802 times:

Quoting cargotanker (Reply 11):
It seems odd to me having transited Andrews numerous times that the C-17 is allowed to continue while Exec1Foxtrot has to do a pattern.

Obviously, that is the problem and that is why the FAA is in a tizzy. In terms of govt protocol, what happened is beyond ridiculous. Probably you tell the C-17 to take a hike, and let Michelle land! Internally, there must be at least double or triple separation the norm for VVIP flights (POTUS, First Lady, VP). You know, the C-32, E-4B, VC-25 type of people. Don't they give the VC-25 very wide separation?


User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8759 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (3 years 8 months 3 days ago) and read 3703 times:

Update:

FAA says "supervisors" now must oversee the arrivals and departures of VVIP aircraft. This is clearly a "cover your ass" Washington style nonsense-fest.

"The Warrenton controller’s error was rated an “A,” the top of the FAA scale for degree of seriousness."

WTH? I've been in go-arounds before. Seen them happen, they are common at some airports. Is this ceremonial error really an A? Just because they aren't polishing the boots of Michelle Obama enough?

Maybe VVIP super separation is one of FAA's prime directives? What is _going on_ here?

     Wash Post Story



[Edited 2011-04-20 19:24:13]

User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2191 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (3 years 8 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3567 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 13):

WTH? I've been in go-arounds before. Seen them happen, they are common at some airports.

Don't get confused. The go-around was not the error. The error was not enough spacing between the aircraft that ultimately ended up with the go-around. Wake turbulence is a big issue, no matter who's on board.

From the article you quoted:

"Warrenton were occupied with other duties and unaware that one of their controllers had allowed the first lady’s plane to get two miles closer than allowed by FAA regulations to the wake of a 200-ton C-17 . . . The Warrenton controller’s error was rated an “A,” the top of the FAA scale for degree of seriousness."

Seems like the folks at Andrews WAS paying attention and did the correct call for the go-around.

bikerthai



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Plane With Michelle Obama Had To Abort Landing
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Obama Proposes To Sell China C-130s posted Mon Oct 11 2010 12:08:14 by ryu2
Obama's Visit To Austin (AUS) posted Fri Aug 6 2010 15:21:07 by Longhornmaniac
Michelle Obama Coming To SAN Today posted Thu Apr 15 2010 08:56:05 by dl767captain
Military Plane With 2 Aboard Crashes At SAV posted Sat Apr 3 2004 20:11:17 by Av8rdal
Student, MPs Ask Government To Keep VIP Plane Grey posted Mon Feb 14 2011 16:08:10 by AC788
Croatian AF To Possibly Stick With The MiG-21? posted Thu Feb 3 2011 00:55:47 by TripleDelta
Obama's AF1 Visit To Hawaii - Which Airport? posted Thu Dec 16 2010 21:04:35 by Aaron747
Is NG Going To Work With Boeing On KC-X? posted Wed Jul 14 2010 18:32:29 by KC135TopBoom
Bundeswehr To Boost Air Power With US Attack Helic posted Mon May 17 2010 14:14:24 by columba
Obama To Visit KSC posted Tue Apr 13 2010 22:02:55 by propilot83

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format