Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Looking For Info On The Boeing Skyfox  
User currently offlineWingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 835 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 8088 times:

I was wondering if the collective expertise had any knowledge of the Boeing Skyfox program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Skyfox



I'm rather fascinated by the concept of the 'conversion kit' that the former lockheed engineers who formed 'Skyfox Corp' came up with. According to the only info I can find, the concept was to re-engine and heavily modify existing Lockheed T-33 airframes into a rather sexy jet trainer/ground attack aircraft - to me it looks sort of like an Me262 with tail-mounted engines.

The business model was based on the fact that surplus T-33s were (and maybe still are) quite plentiful, and that by heavily modifying the existing T-33 airframe it was possible to engineer an essentially all-new airplane without having to design and build one from scratch, allowing a capable trainer to be built for half the cost of a new equivalent.

Boeing was impressed with the idea enough to buy the rights to the program, and there was interest from the Portugese and US airforce, but the program seemed to fizzle out... So this is another airplane to put in the book of 'could have been awesome' failed projects.

If anybody out there has any additional info about what went on with the Skyfox program I'd love to hear your stories, but also what other surplus airframes could benefit from a modification kit like what was done with Skyfox?


Resident TechOps Troll
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline328JET From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 7983 times:

Hey, never heard about that airplane.

And i really like it!


Any more details from somebody?

 

User currently offlineTripleDelta From Croatia, joined Jul 2004, 1053 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 7746 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

There are a few photos of it in the db:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darrell Crosby
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darrell Crosby


Looks like a cross between a Blackbird and an A-10  (and by that I mean it looks great, but IMHO civilian colors suit it better).


No plane, no gain.
User currently offlinejwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7636 times:

Project was shut down because of lack of customers.
Turboprops like the Tucano and PC7/9 are cheaper and do the same job.


I wish I were flying
User currently offlinegarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5251 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 7632 times:

Quoting TripleDelta (Reply 2):
ooks like a cross between a Blackbird and an A-10 (and by that I mean it looks great, but IMHO civilian colors suit it better).

For some reason it reminds me of a cross between an Me-262 and an A-10, especially in that second picture you have there.


South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineWingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 7595 times:

A light twin-jet such as this could have made a great COIN aircraft, although with a MTOW of 20,000lb, less than half of an A-10, it probably would have been limited to light guns and rockets.

But then, there are air forces who would put such as aircraft to great effect, could have been a great value export-aircraft, I puzzle at 'lack of customers'... the IA63 Pampa, Dassault Alphajet and AMX were all coming into service at or after the time this was developed, all in a similar weight and performance category, but all would have been more expensive than the Skyfox, but it wasn't to be...


Resident TechOps Troll
User currently offlinespudh From Ireland, joined Jul 2009, 279 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7568 times:

Thats a good looking airplane.

It's one hell of a conversion, with the raised tail I'm really struggling to see any hint of the T-33, even the stance of it is different, as if they've lengthened the front undercarriage too.

User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4450 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7535 times:

Quoting Wingscrubber (Thread starter):

The business model was based on the fact that surplus T-33s were (and maybe still are) quite plentiful, and that by heavily modifying the existing T-33 airframe it was possible to engineer an essentially all-new airplane without having to design and build one from scratch,

The business case might have been a lot better now, with plenty of competitors proposing clean-sheet business jets, but falling along the wayside after investors lose interest. It would have made an awesome owner-pilot ride!


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29367 posts, RR: 61
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6685 times:

The aircraft did a cameo on an episode of "Airwolf"

It was supposed to be some new fancy air force fighter and the pilot was suffering from the manchurian canidate syndrome from nam was going to steal it and give it the soviets.

Needless to say String and Dominic prevented that from happening.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinetrigged From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 497 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6644 times:

Before:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Williams




After:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darrell Crosby




Believe it or not this is the same aircraft. I wonder if there is a single part on the aircraft that was NOT modified.

Mod edit: Please use the thumbnail feature for posting photos from the database instead of the IMG code.

[Edited 2011-05-07 07:40:54 by srbmod]

User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3252 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6393 times:

That thing looked like a good candidate for chronic tailstrikes...


Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Looking For Info On The Boeing Skyfox
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lockheed & Boeing Designs For The C-17 Contract? posted Sun Mar 27 2011 11:48:18 by 747400sp
Official Boeing KC-X Tanker Post-Bid Thread. posted Thu Feb 24 2011 16:11:36 by moderators
New Boeing Study Compares KC-X Bids posted Thu Sep 16 2010 10:13:01 by KC135TopBoom
Boeing And Northrop To Merge? posted Sun Sep 12 2010 12:29:33 by Flighty
Chances That Boeing/Bell Will Build Quad Rotor? posted Sat Sep 11 2010 04:56:10 by 747400sp
Boeing Military Cuts Jobs Amid Restructure posted Thu Sep 9 2010 02:47:36 by BMIFlyer
Boeing Says KC-X Contest Enters "phase 2" posted Fri Aug 20 2010 16:39:45 by KC135TopBoom
Boeing Plans Commercial Space Taxis By '15 posted Fri Aug 6 2010 18:27:48 by GAIsweetGAI
Is NG Going To Work With Boeing On KC-X? posted Wed Jul 14 2010 18:32:29 by KC135TopBoom
Will Boeing, Eads Show Details After 7/9/10? posted Thu Jul 8 2010 06:58:19 by KC135TopBoom

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format