Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Space Shuttle Engine Power Questions  
User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2690 posts, RR: 10
Posted (3 years 3 months 1 hour ago) and read 5168 times:

Hi there. I've been trying to figure out several things about the shuttle stack lately whose answers have proven elusive to me. First, I've gotten varying results as to the total thrust each solid rocket booster produces at maximum. NASA claims it is 2.8 million pounds increasing to 3.3 million pounds each. Other sources I've found claim they produce 3.1 million pounds each. Which of these is correct, or are neither correct? Also, is the 104% rated performance 104% of the 1.2 million pounds the orbiter's engines produce, or did they produce less than 1.2 million pounds total at one time? I read that at some point their power was increased from what it was in the early days.

Second, I'm wondering if the thrust of the shuttle stack increases after max Q. The SI-C stage of the Saturn V increased to over 9 million pounds after passing through max Q, that's why I'm wondering. If in fact the shuttle stack does have greater total thrust after max Q, does anyone have an actual number for that? Thanks.


Fly one thing; Fly it well
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3525 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5117 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Define the conditions and you'll get better answers I think, but generally as atmospheric pressure decreases tthrust increases.

SSME rated thrust @ 100% = 375000lbs at sea level, 470000lbs in a vacuum.

Shuttle SSMEs throttle down thru max Q. SRBs are also designed to produce less thrust thru max Q. You may recall the infamous last words from Challenger "Go at Throttle Up!!" as Dick Scobee saw thrust levels increase post max Q.

I don't believe the F-1s on the S-1C could be throttled. More likely the increase in S-1C thrust was due to change in atmospheric pressure.

Check out some footage of the S-1C in flight. Note that at sea level the edge of the flame front is pretty much attached to the engine bell. But as atmospheric pressure decreases & aerodynamics change the edge of the flame front will move up towards the front of the RP-1 tank!

For good info on the shuttle check out Dennis R Jenkins book "SPACE SHUTTLE: The History of the National Space Transportation System". I understand a new edition will out within a year or two.



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2353 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5036 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
Also, is the 104% rated performance 104% of the 1.2 million pounds the orbiter's engines produce, or did they produce less than 1.2 million pounds total at one time?

The 100% number was based on the original design, and design improvements increased the available thrust, but they never changed the scale. At one point there were hopes of increasing the normal power to 110%, but NASA could never get that to work reliably, and 109% is the limit even for emergency use.

Quoting Thrust (Thread starter):
The SA) and Svea Flyg (Sweden)">SI-C stage of the Saturn V increased to over 9 million pounds after passing through max Q

The rated sea level thrust of the base F1 was 1,500,000lbs, the vacuum thrust was 1,740,000lbs. The uprated engine on SA-503 upped that a bit, and a bit more on the second uprate on SA-510 (which was rated 1.522Mlbs). Actual performance was a bit higher (the 9.1Mlbs figure comes from working the acceleration of the vehicle backwards on SA-510*). The F-1's expansion bell was sized for near sea level conditions, where thrust was most critical for the S-1C. Contrast the proportionately much larger bells on the J-2s and the AJ-10 (-137) on the Apollo Service Module, which were both optimized to work in vacuum.

Maximum thrust was achieved just before the center engine shutdown (which is about 55s after Max-Q, so it's not really related to that). The center engine was shut down first on both the S-IC and S-II to keep maximum acceleration below the vehicle limits.

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SaturnVThrust2.jpg


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Space Shuttle Engine Power Questions
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Space Shuttle Piggyback Questions posted Sat Jan 10 2009 16:51:33 by AC_B777
Space Shuttle Technical Questions posted Wed Oct 29 2008 17:27:37 by Lnglive1011yyz
Few Space Shuttle Questions posted Sat Jun 23 2007 19:06:05 by Bruce
Book Excerpt: Space Shuttle Owner's Wrkshp Manual posted Tue Apr 12 2011 07:57:03 by j_hallgren
How Much Does It Cost To Launch A Space Shuttle? posted Tue Apr 5 2011 20:36:32 by g38
Space Shuttle Evacuation posted Sat Mar 12 2011 23:46:01 by hamad
Intrepid Museum,NY, Space Shuttle? posted Tue Sep 7 2010 05:37:12 by soon7x7
Choose Wakeup Songs For Last Space Shuttle Flights posted Tue Aug 24 2010 15:23:41 by L410Turbolet
Space Shuttle Manuals posted Thu Jun 3 2010 01:57:54 by propilot83
Space Shuttle Takeoff Sequence As Seen By Me. posted Tue May 18 2010 17:23:48 by eksath

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format