Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Pulse Jet Vertical Take-off Concept  
User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3212 posts, RR: 26
Posted (2 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6130 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

ran into the attached story and video

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...ideo-boeings-all-new-advanced.html

while the concept is interesting looking at the number of pulse jets required per plane, I wonder how efficient it would be for moving large amounts of materials and equipment... plus with the range projected would it have any value (300 NM and 540 NM)?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFoxTwo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5994 times:

Have you seen the movie Avatar  . But in all honesty, I often wonder what will be gracing our skies 20-30 years from now. Mind you, I think Boeing has its hands full answering to the 320NEO.  

User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2011 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5592 times:

Quoting kanban (Thread starter):
would it have any value (300 NM and 540 NM)?

Theater airlift. This was one of the concept Boeing included as part of the future theater airlift a few years back.
More capacity than a V-22.

bikerthai



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently onlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12061 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5475 times:

Quoting FoxTwo (Reply 1):
Mind you, I think Boeing has its hands full answering to the 320NEO.

That is BCA that is answering the A-320NEO. BDS works just on military applications, of which this could be one, they have enough engineers to bring this to a prototype concept. This type of pulse-jet system looks to have significant tactical advantages over hilos and MV/CV-22s. Since the model looks like a conventional airplane (sort of), it is probibly CTOL as well as VTOL capable, thus saving fuel for the VTOL operations and take-off/land on a convential runway at the MOB.

Quoting kanban (Thread starter):
plus with the range projected would it have any value (300 NM and 540 NM)?

With most current helio ops today, they are working on much shorter ranges than that. For example a USMC amphibious operations, the LPDs, ect. are just 25 to 50 nm off-shore, and the hilos, LCACs, and MV-22s just shuttle men and equipment that far, plus maybe up to a few miles ashore.


User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3212 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5467 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
With most current helio ops today, they are working on much shorter ranges than that.

don't they pack most of them in larger planes to get to the theater (Army anyway) this looks to large to do the same... and how many hops required to get from the US to Japan or Algeria? they do mention no mid point refueling however I guess that does not preclude the capability


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2011 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
That is BCA that is answering the A-320NEO. BDS works just on military applications, of which this could be one, they have enough engineers to bring this to a prototype concept.

Depending on which BDS you are referring. It is relatively easy to transfer Engineers from BDS to BCA in the Puget Sound area. So any surplus BDS engineering here would be "sucked" into the tanker or the 737 program.

C-17 (Anaheim) BDS folks would probably be responsible for this plane. Don't know if they have sufficient engineering down there to do the work. They would be less likely be impacted by the Commercial "job sucking sound" though not immune.

bikerthai



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3212 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 5):
They would be less likely be impacted by the Commercial "job sucking sound"

what a switch... for years the "job sucking sound" was the military side sucking the cream of the commercial team.. (B-2, F-22, etc)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Boeing Pulse Jet Vertical Take-off Concept
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Buzz Saw Sound, When C-17s Take Off? posted Wed May 4 2011 14:23:22 by 747400sp
Short C-5 Take Off posted Tue Jan 15 2008 20:25:02 by Beau222
Awesome F-14 Barrer/A-10 Low Take Off Video posted Sun Feb 25 2007 05:35:21 by CF188A
Executive Decision F-117 Take Off Sene posted Fri Mar 24 2006 01:05:46 by 747400sp
Does F-18 Take Off With Speedbrake Extended? posted Thu Dec 15 2005 21:08:00 by Lemmy
Landing And Take Off posted Mon May 2 2005 22:45:50 by EMBQA
Fighter Take-off Question posted Sat Apr 9 2005 05:50:45 by Sprout5199
Did Space Ship One Take Off On Its Own Power... posted Thu Dec 16 2004 15:56:35 by Duke
New Jets Too Heavy For Take Off posted Sun May 16 2004 11:56:22 by EZYAirbus
B52s Take Off posted Fri Mar 21 2003 11:07:41 by Gc

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format