Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Curtiss C-46 Commando  
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5718 posts, RR: 7
Posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1616 times:

Were C-46's built in an engineless glider version?

I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSkymaster From Denmark, joined Apr 2001, 228 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

No it was the C-47 Skytrain/Dakota.
It think only 1 was converted for testing, before the Waco CG-4 transport glider was operational.

User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6383 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1565 times:

Somewhere in the dark recesses of memory, I recall a glider version of the C-46 also. That would have been one big glider though. I could, but won't, research the topic. That bit is up to anyone with time and motivation to do so.

it's getting harder not to tell people they are really odd if they think an airplan can be sexy.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29909 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (11 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1550 times:

I don't recall a glider version of a C-46.

The C-123 was originally developed as a glider but was to late to see wartime service.

I think the C-47 was glide converted after the WACO was already in service. The WACO design was steel tube and much easier and cheaper to put together then a C-47 glider would have been.

I want to say the bulk of the gliders where made up of the WACO's and the British wood HORSA's.

Note about the HORSA's. They built a flying replica of the HORSA for the Orne bridge assault in the move, "The Longest Day".

The British CAA wouldn't grant the thing an airworthiness certificate so they weren't able to use it and had to use models for the assault on the Orne Bridge.

The funny thing is that thousands of Horsa's where used and flown quite successfully during the war. There was even a proposal for a motorized version.

[Edited 2003-04-05 06:49:52]

User currently offlineFBU 4EVER! From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 998 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

No,the C-46 was not contemplated as a glider.
The wing profile was completely different from the C-47's and would have created insurmountable problems when landing in the field.
It was also a very heavy construction,even without the engines.
BTW,the wingspan was wider than a B-17's.It was a big plane,indeed.

"Luck and superstition wins all the time"!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Curtiss C-46 Commando
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
C-46 Usaf #477852, Help! posted Mon Mar 22 2004 00:11:59 by FlyingColors
VA 46 "Clansmen" And VA 75 "Bluehawks" Questions. posted Sun Aug 26 2001 19:43:56 by CX747
Curtiss P-40 posted Tue May 29 2001 00:46:47 by TEDSKI

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format