Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Drone Tanker Aircraft?  
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2098 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5451 times:

While researching something else I came across this, and it's the first I've heard about it. Not only would the Global Hawk refuel another Global Hawk, but they have a role reversal... the tanker will join up from behind with the probe.. while the 'tankee' or reciever will be the forward aircraft with the hose and drogue! This will extend the flight time of the GH from 35 hours to 125 hours.

Nice article on this, and check out the "refueling mishaps" video linked at the bottom of the article.. its got the infamous Sea Stallion event but also several others I'd never seen before. Enjoy!

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...9f93ce-32ea-40ea-9b6c-4b20cb0d5bce

http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/5403/kq4.jpg


Here Here for Severe Clear!
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineebj1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days ago) and read 5241 times:

If this can be done, I see the day coming, though probably not in my lifetime, when military freight will go out on pilotless cargo planes which will be refueled by pilotless tankers. I see both being configured so that they can be piloted by human crews if passengers are onboard but would be pilotless if no life forms (people, livestock, etc.) are being carried. I also suspect both freighter and tanker will take the form of a very large flying wing, with the tanker doubling as a cargo plane when the need arises.


Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlinemoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2298 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5222 times:

They carry the world's smallest boom operator... 


KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5111 times:

NASA has wanted the tanker to be behind and below the receiver for years. They had this proposal to refuel the B-747 shuttler carriers with the tanker below and behind. That was so there would be no adverse turbulance from the tanker on the shuttle if the tanker were in the normal position.

Their plan was to fit several KC-135s with refueling probes for the reverse flow air refueling. The hose and drogue would be on the B-747 carrier aircraft.

The plan back then became unworkable due to the size and capabilities of the fuel pums needed to pump fuel "up hill" at a significant rate and quantity to refuel a B-747.

Will this NG scheme work? With enough technology, yes. I understand NG has a KQ-4 in flight testing now at EDW. But with the Global Hawks costing as much as $200M each, is a dedicated KQ-4 worth the costs? Modifying a few KC-135Rs to refuel RQ-4A/B/E, EQ-4B, and MQ-4Cs may be a much cheaper alternitive even if it has to be done at lower altitudes than the proposed KQ-4 refueling altitude of FL-600.

A modified KC-135 could refuel Global Hawks as high as FL-450, maybe a little higher. The KC-135 can fly as high as FL-500.


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2098 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4874 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
But with the Global Hawks costing as much as $200M each,

The 200M price is with the whole programs costs factored in.. actual airframe price is $35M each up to $50M depending on upgrades. I see your point just clarifying.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlinelegs From Australia, joined Jun 2006, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4834 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
KC-135 could refuel Global Hawks as high as FL-450
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
The KC-135 can fly as high as FL-500.

Are those sorts of altitudes SOP for -135 crews?

Quoting HaveBlue (Thread starter):
125 hours.

I wonder what is the next limiting factor, engine oil perhaps? And on a related note, I wonder what the record is for keeping a Global Hawk (or any other UAV, for that matter) in 'flight mode' with the datalink etc active? Is the system stable enough to support missions up to 5 days long?

[Edited 2011-11-27 22:41:19]

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Quoting legs (Reply 5):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
KC-135 could refuel Global Hawks as high as FL-450
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3):
The KC-135 can fly as high as FL-500.

Are those sorts of altitudes SOP for -135 crews?

Don't know if they are today with the KC-135R/T, but when I flew the KC-135A/E/Q, yes. We would often fly above FL-410 to save fuel.


User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3493 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 8 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 4564 times:

A tanker Drone, that is interesting.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Drone Tanker Aircraft?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Proposed B767 Tanker Is The Wrong Aircraft posted Thu Jul 22 2004 08:56:26 by Tasha
Curious About Non-tanker C-135s posted Sun Nov 20 2011 12:25:40 by Newark727
Government VIP Aircraft At HNL For Apec posted Sun Nov 6 2011 16:02:03 by HNLPointShoot
List Of Current Nasa Aircraft? posted Fri Oct 14 2011 13:04:55 by DCA-ROCguy
Assessment: KC-46A Tanker Low Cost/Technical Risk posted Wed Sep 21 2011 13:46:28 by redflyer
McCarran Military Aircraft? posted Mon Sep 19 2011 09:47:38 by 74-2xx
Thai Crown Prince's Aircraft Impounded posted Wed Jul 13 2011 05:56:46 by KFlyer
Vintage Aircraft From Around Utah posted Fri Jun 24 2011 06:58:35 by dodgerslc
Aircraft Used In The Assault On Osama Bin Laden posted Mon May 2 2011 10:12:44 by tugger
New RAF A330 Mrtt As VIP Aircraft? posted Fri Apr 29 2011 14:12:19 by Bthebest

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format