Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Japan Orders (4) F-35's  
User currently onlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6077 posts, RR: 24
Posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 10253 times:

Just seems a little off that they only order 4. I don't follow military as most of you on here, so I have to ask, is this testing the waters with ordering only 4?

The Japan Ministry of Defense has announced its selection of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II as the Japan Air Self Defense Force's next generation fighter aircraft, following the F-X competitive bid process. The United States government offered the F-35A conventional takeoff and landing variant under the F-X competition. The initial contract will be for four jets in Japan’s fiscal year 2012, which begins April 1. (www.examiner.com)


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently online747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3410 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 10193 times:

This is great news! I think F35s are great replacements for Japan's F-4 fleet.

User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 10162 times:

Flightglobal is saying Japan ordered 42 to replace its F-4 fleet. Too bad they cant get F-22s to replace their F-15s.

User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1656 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 9592 times:

This order could prompt a South Korean order for F-35's as well. They have a fleet of F-4's that also needs replacement, and the F-35 has been mentioned multiple times as a candidate for the third stage of their F-X program.

User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2097 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 9341 times:

Quoting as739x (Thread starter):
Just seems a little off that they only order 4. I don't follow military as most of you on here, so I have to ask, is this testing the waters with ordering only 4?

No, there will be many F-13's delivered to Japan, but apparently for Fiscal year 2012 they budgeted for 4 aircraft, with more to follow after that.

Quoting as739x (Thread starter):
The initial contract will be for four jets in Japan’s fiscal year 2012, which begins April 1. (www.examiner.com)

 



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlinewvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 516 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 8910 times:

its really the only true 5th generation aircrfat availible to both countrie sto offset the new russian and chinese aircraft so it doesnt superise me.

User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1656 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 7108 times:

The DSCA notice has been posted:

http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2012/Japan_12-15.pdf

Quote:
WASHINGTON, May 1, 2012 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress April 30 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Japan for a possible sale of an initial four F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Conventional Take-Off and Landing (CTOL) aircraft with an option to purchase an additional 38 F-35 CTOL aircraft. The estimated cost is $10 billion.

All aircraft will be configured with the Pratt and Whitney F-135 engines, and 5 spare Pratt and Whitney F-135 engines. Other Aircraft Equipment includes: Electronic Warfare Systems, Command, Control, Communication, Computers and Intelligence/Communication, Navigational and Identifications (C4I/CNI), Autonomic Logistics Global Support System (ALGS), Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), Flight Mission Trainer, Weapons Employment Capability, and other Subsystems, Features, and Capabilities, F-35 unique infrared flares, reprogramming center, and F-35 Performance Based Logistics. Also included: software development/integration, flight test instrumentation, aircraft ferry and tanker support, spare and repair parts, support equipment, tools and test equipment, technical data and publications, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $10 billion.

Looks like this sale is getting very close to being a confirmed order.


User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12274 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 6973 times:

Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 6):
The estimated cost is $10 billion.

$10B / 42 = $238M

Just sayin'....



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1042 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6857 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 7):
$10B / 42 = $238M

Just sayin'....

From Flightglobal:

"At $10 billion, the deal values each aircraft at roughly $238 million, although this number includes a lifetime of support."

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...se-f-35-deal-at-10-billion-371362/

I believe I've read somewhere that when considering "lifetime of support" for a fighter jet, the support ratio is somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 times the unit fly away cost?? Anyone else ever seen these ratio's used?

[Edited 2012-05-02 10:05:49]


harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6698 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 8):
I believe I've read somewhere that when considering "lifetime of support" for a fighter jet, the support ratio is somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 times the unit fly away cost?? Anyone else ever seen these ratio's used?

Yes, about 3.5 X the unit flyaway costs, over 30 years is normal for a fighter. But the F-35 is not a normal fighter in the sense it is a stealth aircraft, and maintaning that is very expensive.


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1656 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 6625 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 8):
From Flightglobal:

"At $10 billion, the deal values each aircraft at roughly $238 million, although this number includes a lifetime of support."

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...se-f-35-deal-at-10-billion-371362/

I believe I've read somewhere that when considering "lifetime of support" for a fighter jet, the support ratio is somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 times the unit fly away cost?? Anyone else ever seen these ratio's used?

[Edited 2012-05-02 10:05:49]

Yep, support costs can easily be 2-3 times the unit fly away costs. Don't forget that given the nature of the JSF partnership, per unit pricing differs for partners and non-partners. Simplified, partners contributing to the MOU do not pay for R&D costs on the airframes they purchase; non-partners do pay those costs.


User currently offlinelegs From Australia, joined Jun 2006, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6551 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 9):
about 3.5 X the unit flyaway costs

For comparisons sake, the Australian Super Hornet ended up being about 3.7 times the flyaway cost.

Are these F-35 deals as comprehensive as that contract though? Are they including fuel and weapons and the whole shebang as well?


User currently offlinemffoda From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1042 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6496 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 9):
Yes, about 3.5 X the unit flyaway costs, over 30 years is normal for a fighter. But the F-35 is not a normal fighter in the sense it is a stealth aircraft, and maintaning that is very expensive.
Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 10):
Yep, support costs can easily be 2-3 times the unit fly away costs. Don't forget that given the nature of the JSF partnership, per unit pricing differs for partners and non-partners. Simplified, partners contributing to the MOU do not pay for R&D costs on the airframes they purchase; non-partners do pay those costs.
Quoting legs (Reply 11):
For comparisons sake, the Australian Super Hornet ended up being about 3.7 times the flyaway cost.

Thanks guys,

So, this $10 Billion dollar number for 42 A/C seems to be in-line with what LM has been saying all along (regarding unit flyaway cost). When you take away the questionable news reporting on the costs of this project... It seems to be tracking according to plan (reasonably).

$10 Billion / 42 = $238 million per A/C (Life time support included)

$238m / 3.5 = $68m per A/C (unit flyaway cost)
$238m / 2.5 = $95.2m per A/C (unit flyaway cost)

I suspect the real number will be somewhere in between....



harder than woodpecker lips...
User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6333 times:

Quoting mffoda (Reply 12):
$238m / 3.5 = $68m per A/C (unit flyaway cost)
$238m / 2.5 = $95.2m per A/C (unit flyaway cost)

I suspect the real number will be somewhere in between....

Even if it is the $92m price, it is well below what all the anti-F-35 sources are quoting.


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1656 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3990 times:

Update: Mitsubishi is working with Lockheed Martin on a FACO (Final Assembly and Check Out) facility, with the first Japanese F-35 rolling off the line in 2017:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...th-mitsubishi-on-f-35-line-377480/

This will be important, not only for Japan, but for the US as it means F-35's from the USAF and USN can be maintained in Japan rather than having to be flown back to the US.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Japan Orders (4) F-35's
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus A400m And F-35, A Waste Of Money? posted Sat Dec 3 2011 08:24:14 by B17GUNNER24
F-35 Lrip V Fluctuations posted Mon Oct 31 2011 13:07:26 by kanban
S Korea 4-4E Replacement: F-15 Or F-35? posted Fri Oct 14 2011 07:10:05 by art
US Proposes F-18 Super Hornet To Japan posted Sun Sep 25 2011 21:55:49 by LAXintl
F-35 Structural Cracking Still Being Resolved posted Tue Sep 6 2011 11:20:26 by kanban
More Grief For The F-35... posted Thu Sep 1 2011 05:01:23 by JoeCanuck
Dewline: Bipartisan Conspiracy Against F-35 & V-22 posted Tue Aug 9 2011 10:43:50 by oykie
F-35 Tests Suspended Over System Failure posted Wed Aug 3 2011 17:23:19 by kanban
LM May Offer F-35 To India On Fighter Deal posted Mon Jun 20 2011 13:53:14 by comorin
F-35 Performance According To Test Pilots posted Tue May 17 2011 21:06:40 by ThePointblank

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format