Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Uncertain Future Of Saab Viggen 51-21  
User currently offlineg38 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 229 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4393 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Note to Mods: I would have posted this in the Lelystad topic, but I could not find it, so if you think this inappropriate placement feel free to delete or move this topic. It seems most every topic I post gets deleted for one reason or another, so for that I apologize.

My question is with the closing of the museum at Lelystad, what will become of the Saab Viggen 51-21? Is it still technically owned by the Swedish AF, and if so do they have any plans of preserving it?

On that note, I had heard talk that a Viggen or two might be preserved on the airshow circuit. Is there any truth to this? There seem to be a few high performance jet in private hands here and there (Mig-29s in the USA, and Hawker Hunters in Europe, etc.) Would it be at all possible even if unprobable that one might end up in private hands?

[Edited 2012-01-04 19:28:51]

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinespudh From Ireland, joined Jul 2009, 300 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4281 times:

Quoting g38 (Thread starter):
Would it be at all possible even if unprobable that one might end up in private hands?

I would love to see one of these still flying in years to come. I think they were one of the most underrated fighters ever, far superior to operation in europe than some of the aircraft that beat it in competions. People go on about 9G fighters, these things were designed for 12G!! Short take off and landings from remote strips, very surviveable.


User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3764 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4255 times:

Quoting spudh (Reply 1):
People go on about 9G fighters, these things were designed for 12G!! Short take off and landings from remote strips, very surviveable.

And, at one point, able to get a radar lock on an SR-71 over the Baltic back in the 80's, IIRC. Not bad at all...

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3905 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3961 times:

Quoting g38 (Thread starter):

I remember the Viggen's arrival in Lelystad on a nice winter day six years ago.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong



I believe the aircraft was donated to the museum, I'm not sure though.

In any case, I dont't think there will be, or should be, much fuss about the fate of this Viggen. You can't preseve all old aircraft, and qiuite a number are in European museums even outside Sweden, including Cracow, Hermeskeil, Madrid-Cuatro Vientos and Montelimar.

Quoting spudh (Reply 1):
. I think they were one of the most underrated fighters ever, far superior to operation in europe than some of the aircraft that beat it in competions. People go on about 9G fighters, these things were designed for 12G!!

You seem to imply that the Viggen was superior to the F-16. Generally speaking I disagree with that. Saab's real masterpiece was the Draken which was superior to the F-104, Mirage III and everything else in the previous round.

Peter 



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinespudh From Ireland, joined Jul 2009, 300 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3830 times:

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 3):
You seem to imply that the Viggen was superior to the F-16. Generally speaking I disagree with that. Saab's real masterpiece was the Draken which was superior to the F-104, Mirage III and everything else in the previous round.

I agree with you completely on the Draken but the Viggen had attributes which I believe made it better suited to some operations on the Eastern European front than the F-16. While I'm pretty sure that it could give a good account of itself in the air ironically for a fighter it is on the ground that I feel the Viggen was superior.

If you look at each air war since Vietnam the vast majority of fighters have been destroyed sitting on the runway not in the air. In each of the Israeli, Balkan and Gulf wars this is the way it panned out. The Viggen was designed from the outset with dispersed operations from roads, maintained by conscripted forces as part of its design rationale. It would be very difficult to make a big dent on the Viggen force with a pre-emptive strike. The F-16 by contrast and every other western fighter bar the A-10 and Harrier are firmly tied to big long runways and their associated intensive ground crew infrastructure with great big 'hit me here' signs.

Which of these two scenarios would you rather have at your disposal if the cold war had turned hot? In comparison to Sweden, how many of Germany, Austria, Italy, Greece or Turkeys front line fighters beyond the alert squadrons would have gotten beyond the first day? ideally you would have wanted both available but the Viggen was never procured by anybody else along the Eastern front because it was always in direct competion with the F-16 when in fact it would have been very complimentary.


User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3905 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3780 times:

Quoting spudh (Reply 4):

And I agree with a lot of what you're saying. The F-16 is a good fighter only if you have a spotless big concrete airbase, which is quite an assumption.

The Viggen was more survivable. But I wonder if it was really that flexibe. It's big, heavy, draggy. There were four quite different versions plus a trainer that looks really clumsy   I feel it should have been smaller and more practical, more multirole. Admittedly I have nothing to back this up, except that the Gripen is very much like that  

[Edited 2012-01-07 09:25:16]


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Uncertain Future Of Saab Viggen 51-21
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Future Of Spacelift: Falcon 9 Reusable posted Thu Sep 29 2011 15:35:26 by titanmiller
Future Of Bell Cobra AH1-1Z Secured For 30 Yrs? posted Mon Dec 27 2010 05:50:10 by keesje
The Future Of Ktts? posted Mon Apr 26 2010 23:32:36 by kelpKID
YF-23, F-117, And The Future Of Fighter/bombers posted Wed Feb 4 2009 20:44:23 by PanAm788
The Future Of Nasa Under Obama posted Mon Feb 2 2009 10:54:53 by TheSonntag
What Is The Future Of The Mig Design Bureau posted Tue Nov 11 2008 17:59:11 by Alberchico
Spectacular Saab Commercial With Saab Viggen posted Thu Nov 15 2007 10:06:27 by OwlEye
Future Of Iraqi Air Force? posted Wed Jun 29 2005 23:59:24 by AirRyan
Russia X-555: The Future Of Star Wars & ICBMs posted Mon Jun 6 2005 03:27:56 by AirRyan
Future Of Nasa posted Thu Mar 10 2005 17:57:27 by Daedaeg
Russia X-555: The Future Of Star Wars & ICBMs posted Mon Jun 6 2005 03:27:56 by AirRyan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format