Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Usaf Cancels Contract For Super Tucanos  
User currently offlinevoar From Canada, joined Jul 2008, 95 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 8654 times:

Yet another chapter in this story. It seems the USAF is alleging improper documentation and will "review" the contract. Seems like a move to let Hawker-Beechcaft back in in my opinion.


http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...f-reverses-tucano-purchase-368892/

[Edited 2012-02-28 14:18:50]

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12181 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 8580 times:

This story is getting more twists and turns than the 3 KC-X and CSAR-X.

User currently offlinebennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7809 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 8572 times:

Given that the US is out of Afghanistan in 2014(?) do the USAF want/need this type.

Will the new Afghan/Iraqi govt have the money to buy these planes?.


User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7613 times:

What goes around comes around.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...-after-failed-us-selection-369202/

Quote:
"The US Air Force will probably have to restart its Light Air Support (LAS) programme, the service's top civilian official told Congress on 6 March.

'This is an urgent need from our Afghan partners,' air force secretary Michael Donley told the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. It is very likely we will need to go back and start from scratch on this source selection'."


Quoting bennett123 (Reply 2):
Given that the US is out of Afghanistan in 2014(?) do the USAF want/need this type.

Might have more to do with FX-2.....

Quote:
"The service has started an internal investigation, led by Air Force Materiel Command chief Gen Donald Hoffmann, to determine if there was any wrongdoing. USAF chief Gen Norton Schwartz said last week that there would be 'hell to pay' if any misconduct was discovered.

The Brazilian government, which the USA has been trying to court as an ally, has reacted angrily. However, after the US said it was still interested in the Super Tucano, the two sides have reopened negotiations."



There may be a bit of sense in this proposal after all.....

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...-time-as-acquisition-founders.html

Quote:
"Taking a page from the book of tort reform advocates, perhaps the Pentagon should require that the losing side in a protest pay the program back for the additional costs."



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5593 times:

And then there was one.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/Assets/GetAsset.aspx?ItemID=48097

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...n-light-air-support-tender-382842/

Quote:
"The US Air Force has awarded Sierra Nevada and partner Embraer a $427 million firm fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to supply the Afghan air force with 20 Embraer A-29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft. The award brings to a close a long-running battle between Sierra Nevada/Embraer and Beechcraft to secure the Light Air Support tender."



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinemoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 4089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5533 times:

The question is, did the past year (to the day) improve anything at all?

User currently offlinemoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 4089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5481 times:

In answer to my own post, after a little investigating, no it did not improve anything at all.

The contract awarded a year ago was for $355Million for an initial 20 LAS aircraft.

The contract awarded just now is for $427Million for an initial 20 LAS aircraft.


User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3184 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4924 times:

While I do love the Super Tucano and would be good for places like Afghanistan, with all the spending cuts and sequester in the U.S. - the US public opinion wouldn't be too favorable for a new contract especially for a non US built plane - unless Embraer was planning on building it in Melbourne FL with their Phenom jets

User currently offlineflightsimer From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4772 times:

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 7):

I don't think the issue will be that's it's a non US company, which they are going to be built in Jacksonville BTW. The issue will be why is the US paying for planes they are just going to give away in the first place...



Commercial Pilot- SEL, MEL, Instrument
User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3184 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4594 times:

Quoting flightsimer (Reply 8):
I don't think the issue will be that's it's a non US company, which they are going to be built in Jacksonville BTW. The issue will be why is the US paying for planes they are just going to give away in the first place...

Good point - that is a big reason we are in this kind of debt to begin with. We gave F-16s to Pakistan and in the past we have given weapons to other countries that are now our enemies. For example - the Reagan Administration gave those SAM launchers to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets in the 80s and now they are using them against Americans.


User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4177 times:

Quoting moo (Reply 6):
The contract awarded just now is for $427Million for an initial 20 LAS aircraft.

Which forms the basis for this newest protest by Beechcraft.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...-contract-award-to-embraer-383239/

Quote:
"Now, Beechcraft wants to know why the USAF selected the Embraer A-29 Super Tucano despite the aircraft costing 40% more than a bid based on the AT-6 Texan II.

Bill Boisture, Beechcraft chief executive, says he remains concerned about 'significant errors' in the USAF evaluation process, but did not elaborate."



When are we going to see the end of this?         



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinemoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 4089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4150 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 10):
Bill Boisture, Beechcraft chief executive, says he remains concerned about 'significant errors' in the USAF evaluation process

As usual, the most significant error probably being "they didnt choose our product".


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FAB F-18 Proposal; Fach Signs Up For Super Tucanos posted Fri Aug 15 2008 16:33:42 by PPVRA
New Stealth Aircraft Under Contract For Usaf posted Sat Jun 24 2006 23:05:17 by RichardPrice
Ngad For Super Hornet Replacement? posted Fri May 7 2010 10:25:54 by Devilfish
Indonesia Acquiring Super Tucanos posted Fri Oct 16 2009 16:27:51 by PPVRA
FRANCE/IRAK Sign A Contract For Helicopters posted Wed Mar 25 2009 16:00:58 by JPRM1
Finmeccanica Wins A Contract For 48 M-346 To EAU posted Wed Feb 25 2009 08:10:59 by 777
Usaf Considering Contractors For Aerial Refueling posted Mon Dec 8 2008 20:53:22 by Venus6971
Alenia Won A Contract For 18 G-222 To Afganistan posted Tue Sep 30 2008 02:27:25 by 777
Usaf Cancels C-5 Re-Engine, More C-17s Coming? posted Fri Feb 15 2008 12:31:24 by USAF336TFS
Another USAF/Boeing Contract In Trouble posted Fri Dec 28 2007 07:56:51 by TropicBird