Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Tail Of Two Airplanes  
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4947 times:

How is it we can afford a $395B airplane program, but cannot afford the "luxury" of a $2B airplane program?

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2012/04/30/a-tale-of-two-airplanes/

http://battleland.blogs.time.com/201...el-a-pentagon-procurement-program/

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16858 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4921 times:

I don't understand why they don't give the C-27s to the Army as originally intended.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4909 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 1):
I don't understand why they don't give the C-27s to the Army as originally intended.

That's probably what it's really all about, I don't see any need to compare with F-35.
The C-27 is the subject of inter service rivalry which might still rankle, there are not many of them, they in the minds of some at least, look to be short of a mission post 2014 as regards Afghanistan.
And there are budget cuts.
A perfect storm for this aircraft?


User currently offlinechuchoteur From France, joined Sep 2006, 763 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4891 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Thread starter):
How is it we can afford a $395B airplane program, but cannot afford the "luxury" of a $2B airplane program?

I sometimes get the feeling it is about numbers.
Big numbers mean important things...

A $2bn program for a fleet that is marginal in size (compared to the USAF or Army fleet) is clearly not essential... it is a luxury that one can afford to lose, whereas a $395bn program that will represent the bulk of the future fleet must be preserved...

...and at federal gvt level, writing off $2bn is not unheard of (alas!).

I personally believe the C27J was a good buy, providing a niche capability in the tactical supply/delivery domain, as seen today in Afghanistan.


User currently offlineaeroweanie From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1608 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4470 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

To me, it can be summed up very easily:
F-22 = Fighter airplane
C-27J = Not a fighter airplane

It was the same way with the A-10. The fighter mafia kept trying to retire them and then another war would start and everybody would see how valuable the A-10 is.

Back in 1967, the Air Force felt threatened by the Army's fixed-wing operations and grabbed the tactical airlift mission, getting the C-7 Caribous that were in service and the C-8 Buffalos that were on order. The Air Force promptly retired the Caribous and cancelled the Buffalo order. They did operate some C-123s, but retired them as soon as they could. This was despite the lessons learned in Vietnam, where the C-130 was just too big for many front-line airfields. This forced the Army to buy second-hand Short 360s, glue a Short 330 tail on them and use them for airlift as C-23s. Now that the C-23s are worn out, the Air Force played a con game on the Army, going in as a "partner" on the C-27J buy, grabbing the program and then terminating it. I personally think that every Air Force officer involved in the C-27J scam should be demoted to Airman First Class.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 4279 times:

The C-27J can also be used by Spec Ops guys, it is the perfect airplane for them, small, good range and speed, and able to drop small groups of paratroops. It has also been proposed as the AC-27J Stinger gunship, freeing up the AC-130s for bigger targets.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A Tail Of Two Airplanes
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Two F 16 Jets Of US Air Force Collides! – Accident posted Fri Oct 16 2009 07:09:46 by Seefivein
Two Types Of Inflight Refueling Question posted Sun Jul 6 2008 13:40:14 by Airmech
Two F-15's Collide Over Gulf Of Mexico posted Wed Feb 20 2008 14:54:05 by AGC525
Talk Of F-35 Project Being Scrapped! posted Sat Apr 28 2012 19:03:19 by Zkpilot
F-22'S With In 200 Miles Of Iran! posted Fri Apr 27 2012 20:47:14 by Thumper
94th Anniversary Of The Red Baron's Death: 21.4.12 posted Sat Apr 21 2012 20:06:59 by vanguard737
Another Birdstrike- Air Force Two posted Fri Apr 20 2012 16:22:17 by PSAJet17
Eventual Fate Of The Shuttle Carrier 747 posted Tue Apr 17 2012 09:30:42 by RobertS975
60th Anniversary Of B-52 First Flight posted Sun Apr 15 2012 18:50:46 by Avnut43
50th Anniversary Of First Man In Space posted Thu Apr 12 2012 07:36:11 by PanAm707320B

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format