MikeN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 12 months 4 hours ago) and read 3549 times:
Very good! Did you have to look in the -1? Just kidding, I wish I still had mine. I was a 436 AW manuals control nco for two years before I separated in 1993. If I had any idea of the Internet or of building The Aviation Zone back then, I would have certinaly keep that C-5 bible!
Galaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 23
Reply 8, posted (14 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3525 times:
the ones that where removed where.
1. crosswind gear
2. weight and balance computer
3. HPPS ( high pressure pneumatic system )
4. the MILSTONE intercomm system
5. the Nitrogen fuel scrubbing processor
6. sextant port
7. MADAR 1
8. pnuematic kneeling system
9. FE 1301 system
things that are stiil there or are improvements
1. LPPS is there but is basically inop
2. potable water system is active on B-models
3. MADAR II ( soon to be replaced with MADAR III )
4. L-band SATCOM
6. navigators are still used for special ops
7. MWS CMDS
"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
JohnM From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 376 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (14 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3497 times:
You guys did real well. However the sextant mount was installed on B's. It was yanked out very soon after arrival at home station. I wish it had stayed, the cockpits came home much cleaner when the inflt vac system was still in service. Also the A's never had an auto spoiler system like the C-141. And go around is still installed on the airplane. G/A will advance throttles if auto throttle is engaged (never done), but only give a stupid G/A light and a pitch up command. Go around would be an excellent system to yank out of FRED tomorrow. It is ME leaving home station which I find quite amusing.
B747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 245 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (14 years 11 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3499 times:
JohnM : They should change the MEL to reflect this. It is stupid to have it ME when it isn't used. It's stupid things like that which causes tail swaps, and an embarising FMC rate. Maybe you should put in a Form 22 to have it changed, and collect your whopping $125.