Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F-35 Milestone - First Successful Weapons Drop  
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 11371 times:

Looks like we are moving along just fine with the beginning of the weapons testing phase of the program. Congrats to all!


http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm...ction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=5091

Quote:
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md. – The F-35 Lightning II accomplished a significant test milestone Aug. 8 when the aircraft successfully released a weapon in flight.

BF-3, a short take-off and vertical landing F-35 variant, released an inert 1,000-pound GBU-32 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) separation weapon over water in an Atlantic test range while traveling at 400 knots at an altitude of 4,200 feet.

“While this weapons separation test is just one event in a series of hundreds of flights and thousands of test points that we are executing this year, it does represent a significant entry into a new phase of testing for the F-35 program,” said Navy Capt. Erik Etz, director of test for F-35 naval variants. “Today’s release of a JDAM was the result of extraordinary effort by our team of maintainers, engineers, pilots and others who consistently work long hours to deliver F-35 warfighting capability to the U.S. services and our international partners.”
http://www.navair.navy.mil/img/uploads/120808_O_GR159_003.jpg

The video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbSinROAtHI&feature=player_embedded

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 11918 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 11262 times:

Quoting ThePointblank (Thread starter):
The F-35 Lightning II accomplished a significant test milestone Aug. 8 when the aircraft successfully released a weapon in flight.

Under command? 



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11032 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 1):
Under command?

Yep. Don't want pilots accidentally pushing the shoot button!

Notice how fast the bomb separates from the aircraft; the F-35 has a pneumatic bomb ejection system. Major advance over other aircraft that use pyrotechnics. It means a safer work environment for ground crews around the aircraft, and is more reliable.

http://www.eglin.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123103101

http://www.eglin.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/080325-F-0000Z-074.jpg
http://www.eglin.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/080325-F-0000Z-079.jpg


User currently offlineebj1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 10727 times:

Maybe it's just me but that video looked animated. I'd have never thought the F-35 would move like that in flight.


Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 556 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 10684 times:

Quoting ebj1248650 (Reply 3):

Maybe it's just me but that video looked animated. I'd have never thought the F-35 would move like that in flight.

You mean fly straight and level?


User currently offlineebj1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 10669 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 4):
You mean fly straight and level?

The Youtube video made the airplane look very wobbly. Had a kind of animated look to it. Might have been the photographer didn't have a good grip on the camera, but I would have thought the airplane would be more stable during a weapons release.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlinelegs From Australia, joined Jun 2006, 230 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 10563 times:

Quoting ebj1248650 (Reply 5):

Its probably a case of slight disturbances in the F-35 and the chase plane's flight path stacking up to make it look much worse than it was.


User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 556 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 6 days ago) and read 10340 times:

Quoting legs (Reply 6):
Its probably a case of slight disturbances in the F-35 and the chase plane's flight path stacking up to make it look much worse than it was.

I thought it was because the F35 had poor flight control characteristics and was unable to maintain stable, level flight when dropping munitions. Thanks for clarifying.  


User currently offlinelegs From Australia, joined Jun 2006, 230 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 10111 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 7):

What I said above was just a guess. But I would be incredibly surprised if the test program had progressed to weapons quals without fixing basic flying stability problems like that. Just from memory, I havent heard of any problems with the flight control systems with the F-35.


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 8928 times:

Moving on, high AoA tests will commence soon for F-35A:

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...dwards-afb-about-to-start-f-3.html

Likewise, airborne engine start tests have wrapped up for F-35B, and they will work on starting the high AoA tests for F-35B as well:
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=69384


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8618 times:

The USAF will start operational utility evaluation with the F-35 on Monday:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...evaluation-on-10-september-376217/

Quote:
The US Air Force is scheduled to start an operational utility evaluation (OUE) of its Lockheed Martin F-35A Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) fleet at Eglin AFB, Florida, on 10 September.

The OUE is scheduled to last 65 training days, says Lt Col Randy Efferson, 33rd Operations Group deputy commander and lead planning officer for the evaluation. The review is being led by the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) though an F-35 Joint Operational Test Team (JOTT).

"What they are here to do is evaluate the entire air vehicle system that Lockheed Martin has delivered," Efferson says. "That entails the logistical support, the maintenance side of it, the maintenance training side of it, and the pilot training and the pilot execution side. So it's everything."


User currently offlineboeingfixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 525 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 8514 times:

Quoting ebj1248650 (Reply 3):
Maybe it's just me but that video looked animated. I'd have never thought the F-35 would move like that in flight.

It's more than likely a small problem with a gyro stabilized camera. The background is also moving in an erratic fashion but is in sync with the F-35.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6143 times:

Meanwhile, weapons testing continues with the first AIM-120 release (using an instrumented AIM-120):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQeBgdoiTa4


User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 5615 times:

Kind of surprised no one covered this here yet...

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/images/news/2012_F35C_weapons_P00493_web_1269967624_2521.jpg


User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 899 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 5494 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 13):
Kind of surprised no one covered this here yet...

lol, nobody cares when things are going right for the F-35!


User currently offlineWolbo From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 476 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5343 times:

So six years after it's first flight the JSF has managed to open it's doors and drop something out of it. Impressive.

User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5163 times:

Wolbo...it is impressive. Complicated things, such as stealth aircraft, require a lot of testing. The US had fielded 4 production manned stealth aircraft to date. How many have the Dutch fielded?

User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 556 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5041 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 16):
How many have the Dutch fielded?

Or anyone else besides the US for that matter.


User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1804 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 5002 times:

But still 6 years...EIS is when? Combat ready?

User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 556 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4969 times:

Quoting sweair (Reply 18):
But still 6 years..

I didn't know there was an acceptable timeline for fighter development and testing. The more complex the machine the longer it takes to hash out all the kinks. There was nothing revolutionary about the 4th gen SH or Eurocanards so their programs went rather smooth in comparison.


User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 899 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4166 times:

Gave me a chuckle!

Quote:
"The system right now is behaving as advertised, [although] occasionally, we will have some issues with it on the ground," he says. However, this is usually easily fixed by shutting the aircraft down and then restarting it,
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...ce-of-lockheed-martin-f-35-378578/


http://blog.iso50.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bsod.jpg


User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1551 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4166 times:

Quoting Oroka (Reply 20):
Gave me a chuckle!

Quote:
"The system right now is behaving as advertised, [although] occasionally, we will have some issues with it on the ground," he says. However, this is usually easily fixed by shutting the aircraft down and then restarting it,
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...ce-of-lockheed-martin-f-35-378578/


http://blog.iso50.com/wp-content/upl...d.jpg

Definitely good news to be this mature at this stage of development. It means the hours of development and flights in the CATbird have paid off. The aircraft is performing as expected.

FYI, the F-35's Operations Procedures Manual is online:
http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFI11-2F-35AV3.pdf


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic F-35 Milestone - First Successful Weapons Drop
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
DOD Announces First 3 F-35 Squadrons posted Fri Feb 6 2009 21:02:37 by LAXintl
F-35 First Flight Imminent posted Wed Dec 6 2006 17:34:49 by RichardPrice
F-35 Sonic Boom posted Sat Aug 4 2012 15:03:06 by 787atPAE
F-35 And Burlington, VT posted Thu Jul 5 2012 10:12:24 by ChrisNH
GAO On F-35, June 2012 posted Fri Jun 29 2012 13:37:21 by tommytoyz
Talk Of F-35 Project Being Scrapped! posted Sat Apr 28 2012 19:03:19 by Zkpilot
Usaf Retires First Boeing C17 Globemaster III posted Fri Apr 27 2012 04:17:08 by 747classic
LM F-35/F-16 Fort Worth Plant On Strike posted Mon Apr 23 2012 05:02:19 by KC135TopBoom
60th Anniversary Of B-52 First Flight posted Sun Apr 15 2012 18:50:46 by Avnut43
50th Anniversary Of First Man In Space posted Thu Apr 12 2012 07:36:11 by PanAm707320B
DOD Announces First 3 F-35 Squadrons posted Fri Feb 6 2009 21:02:37 by LAXintl
Talk Of F-35 Project Being Scrapped! posted Sat Apr 28 2012 19:03:19 by Zkpilot
F-35 First Flight Imminent posted Wed Dec 6 2006 17:34:49 by RichardPrice
Air Force Association Magazine On F-35 posted Tue Oct 2 2012 20:48:37 by ThePointblank
First A400M Delivery Suffers Fresh Slip posted Thu Sep 6 2012 09:15:57 by Revelation
F-35 On Exhibition In Front Of Oslo Town Hall posted Fri Aug 31 2012 15:43:25 by Mortyman
F-35 Sonic Boom posted Sat Aug 4 2012 15:03:06 by 787atPAE
F-35 And Burlington, VT posted Thu Jul 5 2012 10:12:24 by ChrisNH
GAO On F-35, June 2012 posted Fri Jun 29 2012 13:37:21 by tommytoyz
Talk Of F-35 Project Being Scrapped! posted Sat Apr 28 2012 19:03:19 by Zkpilot

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format