Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Blog On UK Ministry Of Defence Procurement  
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3727 posts, RR: 32
Posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 5608 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Lasdt night I came across a series of articles on the excesses of the UK Ministry of Defence Procument Policy. They really make you want to cry.

The background:

The Apache/Chinook/ Anglisised Phantom saga's:

The Tornado F2/3 saga:

The Typhoon

The Nimrod:

[Edited 2012-09-19 13:45:30]

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9645 posts, RR: 42
Reply 1, posted (3 years 8 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5434 times:

Quoting VC-10 (Thread starter):
The Tornado F2/3 saga:

Oh yes... The old "Blue Circle" radar system.   

I just can't see short-term-Brownie-point-seeking politicians and the lumbering juggernaut of the Civil Service even beginning to learn lessons anytime soon.

User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 2411 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (3 years 8 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5261 times:

Read 2 so far, really good but really sad at the same time. And I'm not even a UK citizen,so not my taxes wasted......

User currently offlineRIXrat From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 804 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 8 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5209 times:

I read all five of them. Maybe I should take some of the comments with a grain of salt, but generally this is a keeper. I imagine that in most (if not all) countries, the "System" does exactly the same.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13604 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (3 years 8 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 5176 times:

They are not exactly 'new' are they, these stories?
Plus anything connected to the Daily Mail is deeply tainted.

The one of the Tornado F2/F3 apart from being near 30 year history, is deeply ignorant.
The ADV was not meant to be a 'fighter' in the sense that the blogger asserts, just purely an interceptor for the UK, against Soviet bombers.

The old chestnut about Typhoon only being designed for air to air, BS.
You can now search the entire archive of Flight International on line, presumably the blogger did not bother between the his numerous cut and paste jobs with ones from the late 1980's, including interviews with senior RAF staffers explicitly stating a multi role tasking within the design.
The UK pushed for a larger design, as built, to accommodate the attack role better, over the German partners who wanted something a bit smaller for AD only.

So sorry, not impressed, mostly very old stories, playing to the ill informed gallery on a noxious website.
There are loads of good stories about MoD cock ups, waste, out there.

User currently offlineart From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3639 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (3 years 8 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5161 times:

What I find so bewildering is that a system that is so badly organised has not been thrown away despite it reducing military capability for decades.

I suggest:

- Accelerate the decision making process. Decisions that could be taken in days or weeks should not take months or years. With constantly evolving technology an extremely protracted decision making process results in revision due to consideration of incorporating new technology.

- Once a requirement is formulated, that requirement is not subject to revision.

- Salaries payable to personnel organising procurement should be low. The bulk of their earnings should come from bonuses payable for hitting targets on time and within budget.

The effect of his approach would be:

- Faster delivery of equipment. This would mean enhanced capability through punctual delivery of the capability provided by new equipment. It would also help avoid updating existing equipment due to delays in its replacement being delivered, thereby increasing cost.

- Much lower cost than with delayed programmes. The reduction in cost would avoid delayed programmes soaking up funds that could be used for other purposes. It would avoid reductions in overall capability due to the need to cancel other programmes for budgetary reasons or to reduce existing capabiity for budgetary reasons.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Blog On UK Ministry Of Defence Procurement
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
National Audit Office Report On UK Tankers posted Tue Mar 30 2010 04:24:09 by Bongodog1964
UK House Of Commons Recommends C-17 Buy posted Thu Jul 5 2007 05:53:30 by N328KF
RAF Hercules Was Shot Down - Ministry Of Defence posted Thu Dec 8 2005 14:30:37 by Ant72LBA
Need Info On B-17s/B-24s Of 490th Bomb Group posted Mon Nov 22 2004 02:00:24 by SmithAir747
JSF Documentary On UK TV Tonight posted Mon May 12 2003 18:49:26 by GDB
F-35 On Exhibition In Front Of Oslo Town Hall posted Fri Aug 31 2012 15:43:25 by Mortyman
Safety Of Handcuffed Pax On Extradition Flights? posted Tue Apr 10 2012 16:45:18 by BuyantUkhaa
C-17 Operating Cost 1/3 Of C-5 On Par With C-130 posted Wed Sep 7 2011 11:39:30 by PolymerPlane
End Of An Era, Last UK Harrier Carrier Flights posted Thu Nov 25 2010 06:44:02 by keesje
UK Defence Cuts - 2nd CV Offered To India posted Wed Sep 22 2010 22:33:02 by Shmertspionem

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format