Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Did California Get A Shuttle?  
User currently offlineeksath From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1295 posts, RR: 25
Posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 6606 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
ARTICLE EDITOR

Why did California get a shuttle?

I have heard a lot of comments/complaints about where the shuttles should have/should not have been retired to.

There was really only one in play- Endeavour. Smithsonian was always getting one and so was KSC.

The following puts the case for Endeavour going to LA in good focus.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...ers-20121009,0,600268.story?page=1


I am sure this debate will arise next week again when the move starts. I hope this helps settle the argument.


World Wide Aerospace Photography
38 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6592 times:

The fact that its located in a high population area like New York dosen't hurt either. Even NASA admitted that one of the key factors were locations where as many people as possible could see the shuttles. That's why as a result of that criteria Houston and Dayton lost....


short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5419 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6500 times:

Quoting eksath (Thread starter):
Why did California get a shuttle?

Well California was home to the plants which manufactured the orbiters and the SSME's and is home to Edwards, where nearly half of shuttle flights ended

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineNBGSkyGod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 795 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 6345 times:

The LA area was once home to an aerospace industrial complex that rivaled the Silicon Valley's computer complex. All of the major manufacturers of aircraft and spacecraft had factories there: Hughes, Rockwell, Lockheed, Honeywell, McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, etc. It is only reasonable that an area that contributed so much to the program would get a shuttle when it retired.


"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 6139 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 2):
Well California was home to the plants which manufactured the orbiters

No, not quite. The FAL was at Palmdale, which is a USAF facility nearly all Californians cannot get into. The parts for the shuttles were manufactured in nearly every US state.

Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 3):
All of the major manufacturers of aircraft and spacecraft had factories there: Hughes, Rockwell, Lockheed, Honeywell, McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, etc. It is only reasonable that an area that contributed so much to the program would get a shuttle when it retired.

Their all gone, except Boeing Long Beach, which will be closing in the next few years after the last C-17 is delivered.

California got a real shuttle, New York got the prototype purely for political reasons. Houston got a mock-up of a toy. Houston ran EVERY shuttle mission, none were run from California. In fact the once built west coast shuttle launch site at VBG was never used by a shuttle, except for the test fits by Enterprise. SLC-6 is only used to launch Delta IV.

Politics was the ONLY consideration in selecting the final homes for the shuttle fleet. The selections were made by the White House and not by NASA.


User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5419 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 6114 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
No, not quite. The FAL was at Palmdale, which is a USAF facility nearly all Californians cannot get into. The parts for the shuttles were manufactured in nearly every US state.

Well I understand that. But Seattle (and now SC) is still where people consider Boeing's to to be built. California contributed a hell of a lot to the shuttle program and I see no need to diminish that.

I can see that you are upset at how things turned out but it doesn't change that "California" is deserving of getting a Space Shuttle. I was just pointing out why California was worthy of such and honor, not saying anywhere else was not.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8403 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 6105 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
The selections were made by the White House and not by NASA.

Israel is probably outraged they didn't get one!


User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 6094 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
Politics was the ONLY consideration in selecting the final homes for the shuttle fleet. The selections were made by the White House and not by NASA.

Prove it.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 6056 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tugger (Reply 5):
California contributed a hell of a lot to the shuttle program and I see no need to diminish that.

Califiornia contributed, and still contributes, a hell of a lot to TONS of aerospace programs, whether they are NASA, armed forces, private, whatever.

I've said it before, I'll say it again:

To be honest, I don't understand why people say SoCal shouldn't have one. Between the orbiters being built here and landing here on many missions, and TONS of aerospace industry here (which pumped a lot of parts and such into the program, I'm sure), it seems a fitting location.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
No, not quite. The FAL was at Palmdale, which is a USAF facility nearly all Californians cannot get into.

Which part are you saying "not quite" to? Palmdale is in SoCal. Of course components get manufactured elsewhere. Boeing doesn't put together every last component in Seattle, either.

Would you rather the Shuttle be at AF Plant 42, which, as you say, nearly all Californians cannot get into?

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
Their all gone, except Boeing Long Beach, which will be closing in the next few years after the last C-17 is delivered.

They may not all be factories, but Boeing, Northrop, Raytheon, Honeywell, SpaceX, Aerospace Corp., Lockheed, Gulfstream, the Air Force, the Navy, the Marines, NASA, and hundreds of other companies still have a large presence in SoCal.

Just because SoCal isn't a focus of final assembly anymore doesn't mean it doesn't have a large aerospace sector.

Quoting alberchico (Reply 1):
That's why as a result of that criteria Houston and Dayton lost....

You know Houston is the 4th most populous city in the country, right? And the focus of the 5th most populous metro area?

I really can't see NYC getting a Shuttle over Houston.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineNBGSkyGod From United States of America, joined May 2004, 795 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5992 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
Their all gone, except Boeing Long Beach, which will be closing in the next few years after the last C-17 is delivered.

Yup, I still remember having Boy Scout meetings at the Rockwell plant in Downey, with a full shuttle mockup inside.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 8):

Califiornia contributed, and still contributes, a hell of a lot to TONS of aerospace programs, whether they are NASA, armed forces, private, whatever.

This is true, but it is only a shell of its former self. Although Boeing Space (formerly MDC Space) still has its main building in Huntington Beach, just off the Seal Beach Navy Base.



"I use multi-billion dollar military satellite systems to find tupperware in the woods."
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5964 times:

Quoting SSTeve (Reply 7):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):Politics was the ONLY consideration in selecting the final homes for the shuttle fleet. The selections were made by the White House and not by NASA.
Prove it.
http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2011/04...-in-bid-for-retired-space-shuttle/

http://www.rv-103.com/charlie-bolden...r-obama-here-have-a-space-shuttle/

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 8):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):Their all gone, except Boeing Long Beach, which will be closing in the next few years after the last C-17 is delivered.
They may not all be factories, but Boeing, Northrop, Raytheon, Honeywell, SpaceX, Aerospace Corp., Lockheed, Gulfstream, the Air Force, the Navy, the Marines, NASA, and hundreds of other companies still have a large presence in SoCal.

Just because SoCal isn't a focus of final assembly anymore doesn't mean it doesn't have a large aerospace sector.
Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 9):
This is true, but it is only a shell of its former self.

Yeap, In the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s SoCal was pounding out hundreds of DC-8s, DC-9s, DC-10s, and L-1011s, along with many other airplanes and space vehicles. SoCal has been loosing its aerospace industry since the 1990s due to the unfriendly tax on businesses to states like Washington, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and others. The same can be said for New York State, which once had a large and proud aerospace industry, too. Engineers have left California by the hundreds of thousands in the last 20 + years. No state, except maybe Florida, has a longer and more proud tradition in space than Texas. Yes, SoCal did have a large space and flight testing program, mostly at EDW and NID which are in SoCal because of the high desert and weather, and for no other reason. PMD started out as a USAAF Field training B-25 crews during WWII, It later was opened for commerical operations by several aerospace companies for FAL of many projects there for civilian, military, and space programs. The L-1011 was built there, as was the SR-71, F-117, and currently the Global Hawk.


User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5940 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 9):

This is true, but it is only a shell of its former self.

A shell of it's former self still equals a larger aerospace industry than probably every other city in the US....probably some states, too.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 5922 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 10):
http://www.rv-103.com/charlie-bolden...r-obama-here-have-a-space-shuttle/

I'd like to believe you're joking, rather than believe you think an angry rant is somehow proof.


User currently offlineJeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 836 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5895 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
Politics was the ONLY consideration in selecting the final homes for the shuttle fleet. The selections were made by the White House and not by NASA.

The irony is rich there. Why are NASA operations in Houston at all and not just Florida? Politics. Specifically because of LBJ. Where did I learn that? Well, aside from history, it was publicly stated by the tour guide who led our group at KSC. So to kvetch about Houston not getting a Shuttle is just sour grapes.

That said, huge amounts of development for the Space Shuttle program were done in southern California. Don't take my word for it, for a great in-depth set of lectures by those who designed, built, managed, and also flew the Shuttle, I recommend this series of lectures from MIT:

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronauti...aft-systems-engineering-fall-2005/

Quote:

Course Highlights
This course was administrated by shuttle astronaut and MIT Professor Jeff Hoffman and Professor Aaron Cohen, who was the Space Shuttle Orbiter Project Manager. Guest speakers provide the majority of the content in video lectures, discussing topics such as system design, accident investigation, and the future of NASA's space mission.

Course Description
16.885J offers a holistic view of the aircraft as a system, covering: basic systems engineering; cost and weight estimation; basic aircraft performance; safety and reliability; lifecycle topics; aircraft subsystems; risk analysis and management; and system realization. Small student teams retrospectively analyze an existing aircraft covering: key design drivers and decisions; aircraft attributes and subsystems; and operational experience. Oral and written versions of the case study are delivered. For the Fall 2005 term, the class focuses on a systems engineering analysis of the Space Shuttle. It offers study of both design and operations of the shuttle, with frequent lectures by outside experts. Students choose specific shuttle systems for detailed analysis and develop new subsystem designs using state of the art technology.


User currently offlineAreopagus From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5880 times:

I think the above arguments for Florida, Houston, LA, and the Smithsonian are very strong. The real issue is, why should one be posted in NYC, less than 250 miles away from the Smithsonian, when the country is so big? Houston would help to bring a much bigger swath of the US within driving range of a shuttle. Putting one in New York doesn't make any sense.

User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5851 times:

Quoting Areopagus (Reply 14):
Putting one in New York doesn't make any sense.

I agree-- their criteria sucked. What didn't happen is political intervention when those criteria delivered a stupid result.


User currently offlinenickh From United States of America, joined Jun 2008, 182 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 5758 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I live in Houston, TX, and I did some work out at KSC on STS-67/Endeavour back in the mid 1990s (comm/up-downlink), so it was a personal thing for me when Endeavour did a fly-by on the Shuttle Transporter 747 -- near my office, several days ago, and landed at Ellington Field in Clear Lake (Houston) for a refueling, show & tell.

I saw the fly-by through my office window. I tried to run outside to catch the tail-end, but it was too late.

So WHY did Mission Control/JSC in Houston *not* get a shuttle? Incompetent politicians. Simple as that.

Almost makes you want to not vote any more - it only encourages the b*stards.

.

-Nick



"We all have wings, but some of us don't know why..."
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10884 posts, RR: 37
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 5686 times:

I would so much love to see this... a Space Shuttle parading through city streets!
What an awesome sight this must be!!!

     

The Space Shuttle Endeavour began its first-ever parade through city streets late Thursday, and anyone in the Los Angeles area can get a front-row seat.
The retired craft is on its way to a Los Angeles museum where it will spend its retirement.

Endeavour, which made its last trip to space in May 2011, is soon set to join the ranks of museum displays at the California Science Center (CSC).

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49380316/ns/technology_and_science-space/

I hope this most unusual Space Shuttle road trip will be turned into a giant party!

Those who happen to be in the area please get us some nice pictures!

              



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9776 posts, RR: 27
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5671 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MadameConcorde (Reply 17):
I hope this most unusual Space Shuttle road trip will be turned into a giant party!

They already put a pretty big damper on that:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...uttle-anger-20121005,0,98874.story



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5541 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 10):
http://www.rv-103.com/charlie-bolden...r-obama-here-have-a-space-shuttle/

That's your proof? What partisan crap!

Why New York and not Houston? Because tourists flock to New York. What else is in Houston that anyone would want to see? The tallest building that's not in a downtown area? Wow, I'M impressed!    They're just pissed that we pronounce our street Howston, not Youston.



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5539 times:

Quoting JeffSFO (Reply 13):
Why are NASA operations in Houston at all and not just Florida? Politics. Specifically because of LBJ. Where did I learn that? Well, aside from history, it was publicly stated by the tour guide who led our group at KSC.

That is correct. Then President Kennedy put (then) VP Johnson in charge of the flrdling space program.

Quoting nickh (Reply 16):
So WHY did Mission Control/JSC in Houston *not* get a shuttle? Incompetent politicians. Simple as that.

Correct.

Quoting MadameConcorde (Reply 17):
I hope this most unusual Space Shuttle road trip will be turned into a giant party!

Yeah they can create bon fires from all the trees that had to be cut down along the route. LOL

The fact is the CSC is a small museum when it comes to their air and space exhibits, compared to the space museum at Houston and the USAF museum at Dayton. They only have 6 airplanes or airplane replices and 5 space exhibits, including the Apollo 16 space suit from a moon mission.


User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5537 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 20):
flrdling

Did you mean 'fledgling'?



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineeksath From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1295 posts, RR: 25
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5534 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
ARTICLE EDITOR

You guys do know that that the OV-101 is merely a prototype that is far removed from the orbiters that actually flew in space?

101 was deemed to too structurally different to be economical fitted as an space worthy orbiter very early on (hence Challenger was born). Again, after the Challenger incident, 101 was passed up for Endeavour's creation.

There is also nothing really inside her when one compares with the real thing. She is pretty bare inside for example her flight deck just a frame with everything that was used in the approach and landing tests removed. Big empty holes fill the flight deck where things would have been. She lacks many of the subsystems and components that one would expect to be inside. i.e. the shape and her history in the ALT testing and fit testing is what one is looking at. Hey payload bay is no different.

Just thought i would put it in there as people equate her with the space worthy fleet by merely looking at the outside shape.



World Wide Aerospace Photography
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10884 posts, RR: 37
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5513 times:

Quoting eksath (Reply 22):
She is pretty bare inside for example her flight deck just a frame with everything that was used in the approach and landing tests removed. Big empty holes fill the flight deck where things would have been. She lacks many of the subsystems and components that one would expect to be inside. i.e. the shape and her history in the ALT testing and fit testing is what one is looking at. Hey payload bay is no different.

About the same as Concorde G-BOAB at Heathrow, an almost empty shell with piles of British Airways magazines stacked up inside her, yet still as beautiful looking as the first day, as if she was ready to taxi and align on the runway for flight.

     



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5493 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 20):
Quoting nickh (Reply 16):
So WHY did Mission Control/JSC in Houston *not* get a shuttle? Incompetent politicians. Simple as that.

Correct.

You could name names. Who do you have in mind? Mayor of Houston? The Texas delegation in Congress? Who simply assumed they'd get one and sat on their hands?


25 vikkyvik : The fact is that this small museum's air and space exhibit is growing. You know, cause they just got a Space Shuttle. That's what museums do...... Wa
26 SSTeve : ^ Enterprise did the fit check at Vanderburg. NYC should be whingeing about getting the fake Shuttle that CA deserved.
27 NBGSkyGod : I suppose the fact that they were built here doesn't matter much then.
28 vikkyvik : That makes absolutely no sense. You haven't read the rest of the posts, I take it.
29 SSTeve : It was a joke making light of the abject seriousness which ya'll take the arguments about which place was more entitled to which shuttle. I don't gen
30 vikkyvik : Guilty as charged, I suppose. My bad.
31 Post contains images MadameConcorde : I just hope they will be able to raise enough money so they can provide Space Shuttle Endeavour proper 'maintenance'. through the years. Also it seem
32 135mech : Defnately, NY has other things to "have" and with the Udvar-Hazy being that close... there was no need for NYC. No offense to any New Yorkers, just t
33 seachaz : I get the sentimental reasons people feel slighted but looks like they pretty much followed the tourists. According to the Forbes list of most visited
34 vikkyvik : I don't know for sure, but I would bet a fair amount of money that the metro LA area in general gets far more tourists than metro Chicago. In fact I'
35 SSTeve : Chicago did complain.
36 Post contains links CplKlinger : As much as I might be tempted to complain that Dayton didn't get one (as I'm about an hour and 20 mins away), they got something just as exciting to m
37 seachaz : That's a good point - will you be able to do more then merely view the exterior of Discovery/Atlantis/Endeavor at their respective locations?
38 Post contains links and images vikkyvik : Don't know, but this is all I saw of Endeavour on my way to the USC game today, and I was really freaking excited about seeing that little sliver!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Did California Get A Shuttle?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did The US Navy Retire The S3B? posted Mon Jul 16 2012 19:15:09 by Max Q
Why Did The Usaf Pick The 742 Over The 743? posted Tue Mar 30 2010 14:31:04 by overloaduk
Why Did The IAF Choose The F-15? posted Tue Jun 24 2008 19:10:39 by Blackbird
Why Did The Sikorsky S-72 "X-Wing" Fail? posted Tue Jul 3 2007 18:14:17 by N231YE
Why Did RB-57F Need The Extra J 60 Turbojets? posted Sat Sep 23 2006 23:20:31 by 747400sp
The X-33: Why Did It Fail? posted Tue Aug 16 2005 05:26:48 by Citation X
Why Did The French Navy Operate The F-8 posted Sat Mar 19 2005 18:58:58 by RampRat74
Why Did Canada Choose The F-18? posted Tue Feb 17 2004 10:35:53 by Vio
" Video Highlights Why Shuttle “Rocked” " posted Sun Feb 19 2012 17:16:08 by eksath
Changes In Shuttle Launch Stats And Reasons Why posted Sun Aug 28 2011 15:09:26 by Thrust

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format