Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New 750 Million Dollar Mexican President Toy? No  
User currently offlineogshelly From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 26 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 12552 times:

Such is the headline of iReport.CNN back in August 1, 2012. I thought that instead of the Dreamliner, Peña Nieto's new administration was acquiring the space shuttle. Today, I was very happy to read that Aeromexico will negotiate with Boeing, the acquisition of the 787-9 for newly elected president of Mexico Enrique Peña Nieto at a fraction of the price originally posted by CNN, it is $139 MM USD taking advantage of the order for 90 - 737-8 and 10 - 787's in Boeing's works currently. Training of pilots, engineers and mechanics will be championed by AMX. Below, both URL's:

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-823577 | http://www.excelsior.com.mx/index.ph...cion=portada&cat=28&id_nota=864786

Feel free to comment, add, delete, correct anything, you folks are the experts.
Good day amigos

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineORDBOSEWR From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 438 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 12536 times:

Should be 781 Million peso's and ~140M dollar, according to the article.
That is the purchase price that AeroMexico is paying and those are the terms for the presidents new plane.


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7582 posts, RR: 42
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 12153 times:

This has been discussed ad nauseam, but let's do it again: 750 million dollars was the aggregate cost of the lease payments of a 787-800 over 15 or 20 years (can't remember the exact term, but I think it was 20), plus a comprehensive maintenance and overhaul package that would cover the entire lease term. I do not believe 750 million was an outrageous amount for all these concepts spread over such a long period of time. The real problems are the inability of the Federal Government to explain in detail its plans, the bad faith and sensationalism of the media when reporting these types of news, and the ignorance and whining of large segments of the population.

Anyway, I think that the new plan consisting of a direct purchase of a 787-900 for 139 million is in the end a very good solution that will appease the whiners and will let the Federal Government have a state of the art aircraft for years to come.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 966 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 12011 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That 787 will be a good replacement for that old 757-200

Flying from Mexico City's high altitude to anywhere in Europe, Asia, Mid East and even deep South America requires a stop. Those get expensive with security and coordination. The 787 should take care of that

And as Eddie said, if the Mexican government took 5 minutes to explain why they're buying the airplane, that'd save them a lot of headaches


User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7560 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 11771 times:

Is this the first state-owned and operated 787?


次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6206 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 11730 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 2):
The real problems are the inability of the Federal Government to explain in detail its plans, the bad faith and sensationalism of the media when reporting these types of news, and the ignorance and whining of large segments of the population.
Quoting g500 (Reply 3):
And as Eddie said, if the Mexican government took 5 minutes to explain why they're buying the airplane, that'd save them a lot of headaches

I´m not so sure. Same thing happened back in the 80s when they got the 757. No matter the President had been flying for two decades in an old 727, the media raised up a stink when they discovered the 757 had been bought. I guess it´s what sells, and since logic doesn´t sell, you need to use these stories to generate stupid arguments.



MGGS
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 966 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 10349 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 4):

Sounds like it will be the first presidential 787.

Maybe a brand new 737 BBJ or ACJ-319 (airbus corporate jet) would have been a bit more discreet and half the price.... Those ACJ-319s have a 6700 Nautical mile range. The 737-BBJ has a 6400 NM range.

But then again our president here flies from D.C to NYC in a 747, so......


User currently offlineodwyerpw From Mexico, joined Dec 2004, 856 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 10305 times:

That is the issue here... communication.
In Mexico, we are very leary of large purchases made by public officials just on their way in or just on their way out of office. It is during these transitional periods that the graft and corruption runs the wildest.

The government really needed to explain the full details of the purchase to the public... Why? Because ultimately it is the public's money. Well the money of the 66% of those who get to participate in the economy. The 33% living in abject poverty cannot even begin to understand the necessity of such purchases. It really has to be laid out to them in very simple terms (fuel savings, maintenance savings, fuelstop staff/security savings, etc..).

That said, glad to see the 787-9 coming to Mexico!!



Quiero una vida simple en Mexico. Nada mas.
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 6 hours ago) and read 9506 times:

Why didn't Mexico just pick up one of the decommissioned flight test B-788s? Boeing has written them off. Removing test equipment, wiring, and refurbishing these airplanes can be done relitively cheaply. They still have the range to fly non-stop MEX to anywhere in the EU, and most places in western Asia. The B-788 is still a bogger airplane than the B-752.

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30989 posts, RR: 86
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 6 hours ago) and read 9505 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 8):
Why didn't Mexico just pick up one of the decommissioned flight test B-788s? Boeing has written them off.

Boeing legally cannot sell ZA001, ZA002 or ZA003.

As for ZA004, ZA005 and ZA006 it might be that the change incorporation cost is such that it's cheaper to buy a new-build. That being said, ZA006 is evidently undergoing change incorporation so it appears one 787VIP customer went that route...


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9282 times:

Thanks, stitch. That means if Mexico were to go that route, and wanted RR power, the only airplane available would be ZA-004, as ZA-005 has GEnx engines.

User currently offlineyyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16259 posts, RR: 56
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 8816 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 2):
Anyway, I think that the new plan consisting of a direct purchase of a 787-900 for 139 million is in the end a very good solution that will appease the whiners and will let the Federal Government have a state of the art aircraft for years to come.


In a country as poor as Mexico, surely that $139M can be better spent on healthcare, education, or perhaps law enforcement. Third world countries do not need state-of-the-art Presidential aircraft when they are facing so many social problems. This new 789 will NOT help the average (poor) Mexican nor solve the Mexican crime problems.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 8706 times:

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
This new 789 will NOT help the average (poor) Mexican nor solve the Mexican crime problems.

Neither will the $139M. With the size of the budget of Mexico, about $250B, this isn't even a drop in the budget bucket. Mexico has the world's 13th largest economy (PPP), with a 2012 GDP of $1.75T (PPP) and a GDP per capita of nearly $15,800. Mexico has a population of nearly 115M people, and 10.5% of the population is discribed as being "extreme poverty". Then again, Mexico has a school drop out rate about 22%.

Crime in Mexico is a whole other problem the Mexican people face, mostly from drug lords with the extremely high murder rate.


User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8693 times:

I don't see where a G-V or Global Express would not have served the Mexican President just fine. Does Mexico President really make a lot of worldwide trips? Do they carry a lot of staff, or security?

Mexico's interests would seemingly be more confined to the Western hemisphere, are they really much of a global player? (Exports/Imports.) And will this be a BBJ like configuration, or will it have some sort of secure comms infrastructure? Just don't see where they need a plane the size of a 787. Makes sense to let AeroMexico do the purchase and MX for cost savings like Qantas does, but for example in the US, in order to work on AF1 you have to have TS security clearance, which not every qualified mech is readily able to get and keep. ($$$)


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 8580 times:

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
In a country as poor as Mexico,

Relative to the US yes, relative to other countries, no. Mexico has an large trade surplus with the US. tthat has to say something.

Third world? Don't think so. With plenty of export of agricultural and manufacturing goods to the US, Mexico would be more closely be considered as second world.

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
country as poor as Mexico, surely that $139M can be better spent on healthcare, education,

Why? we don't do it here in the US  
Quoting AirRyan (Reply 13):
. Does Mexico President really make a lot of worldwide trips

Just look at who owns all the electronic manufacturing plants in Mexico. If you want to bring that type of work to Mexico, you have to go to where the board room for those companies resides . . . Japan and China. Then just think of the flights to the South America . . . it's not trans oceanic but it's definitely intercontinental . . .  
Quoting yyz717 (Reply 11):
Third world countries do not need state-of-the-art Presidential aircraft

This will not be a state-of-the-art aircraft in the same sense as AF1. It will be more or less similar to Aeromexico's 787 (with maybe some advance communication added). We are not talking about command and control here.

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4837 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 8528 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 6):
Maybe a brand new 737 BBJ or ACJ-319 (airbus corporate jet) would have been a bit more discreet and half the price.... Those ACJ-319s have a 6700 Nautical mile range. The 737-BBJ has a 6400 NM range.
Quoting bikerthai (Reply 14):
Just look at who owns all the electronic manufacturing plants in Mexico. If you want to bring that type of work to Mexico, you have to go to where the board room for those companies resides . . . Japan and China. Then just think of the flights to the South America . . . it's not trans oceanic but it's definitely intercontinental . . .

If they wanted nonstop global reach, the farthest possible capital from MEX (apart from the former Russian republics) is CGK which would require at least 91120 nm via GC.....

http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=mex+-+d...+rgn+/+pnh+/+khi+/+bom+/+thr&DU=nm


As an aside, Boeing now offers a BBJ version of the 738MAX.....

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article....e-xml/awx_10_29_2012_p0-511481.xml

6,325 NM range.....4 passengers.  Smile I wonder what the rest of the plane would be for.  scratchchin 

[Edited 2012-10-29 11:03:44]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 8431 times:

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 14):
Third world? Don't think so. With plenty of export of agricultural and manufacturing goods to the US, Mexico would be more closely be considered as second world.

Actually, first world, second world, and third world have nothing to do with economies. It is a military alignment with first world aligned with the US and/or NATO, second world aligned with Russia and communism, and third world not aligned countries. In this respect, Mexico is a non-aligned country.


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 8410 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 16):
. In this respect, Mexico is a non-aligned country.

  

Thought about this after the post. However, people keep referring to "third world" as poor/impoverish. Maybe we should all shift to new definition because the the world have broken up in to many geo-polictical allegiances now . . . so the economic connotation remains the best definition.

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 8001 times:

But Mexico has a bigger and more stable economy than Greece or Spain.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic New 750 Million Dollar Mexican President Toy? No
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Romanian President Receives New Upgrade posted Mon Nov 22 2010 10:15:41 by klm77
Misplaced Wings No Sweat For DARPA's New FCS posted Thu Jun 12 2008 12:08:50 by TGIF
Why No New AC-130 Gunships? posted Thu Dec 22 2005 01:51:31 by CX747
US President Selects A380 As New Air Force One... posted Tue May 3 2005 22:56:35 by AirOrange
China's New Y-20 Pictures On Internet posted Mon Dec 24 2012 12:10:35 by fly828
New A.NET Article On The Nasa 747 SCA Is Up! posted Tue Nov 20 2012 12:20:53 by eksath
President Obama's Asia Trip posted Sat Nov 17 2012 05:19:27 by wahdadli
An-225 No. 2 To Be Completed posted Tue Nov 6 2012 04:46:59 by KiwiRob
First Flight Of China's New Stealth Fighter J-31! posted Wed Oct 31 2012 13:37:08 by justinlee
Usaf Tests New EMP Weapon. posted Thu Oct 25 2012 09:26:38 by WB556

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format