Decommissioned German C-160 Near Catastrophe! — Military Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Decommissioned German C-160 Near Catastrophe!

flightsimer From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 409 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 10237 times:

Holy Crap that was close!
Video and pic below

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=002_1350495356

Instrument Rated: Single/Multi Engine

18 replies: All unread, jump to last

bennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 6352 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (7 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 9845 times:

IMO, the public were allowed WAY to close to a landing aircraft, even before the kangaroo hop.

francoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3195 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9794 times:

That was close...
The onlookers were too close, but they were still outside the fences and far from the displaced threshold.
I don't know how long the runway was, but the approach was just way too low in any case.

Good thing it was its last landing too. The landing gear took quite a beating.

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...

flyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 1268 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9792 times:

---> ---> ---> ---> --->

David

Even a letdown, if it is thoroughly and final, is a step forward.

L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29350 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (7 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9792 times:

Well he walked away from it so it was a good landing

Seriously any details about the field he landed on? Was it so short he felt it was better not to follow the glideslope laid out by the PAPI? The field clearly has one, he rolls by it at the end of the film

OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.

flyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 1268 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 9781 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 4):
Seriously any details about the field he landed on?

Here's the map....

The asphalt runway is 685 meters long (per Wikipedia). Now I've measured on Google maps:

When landing on RWY 27 (as in the video), the distance from the landing threshold to the end of the runway is 610 meters.

David

Even a letdown, if it is thoroughly and final, is a step forward.

Larshjort From Denmark, joined Dec 2007, 1216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 9752 times:

Landing distance is quoted at 1970ft in Flight 1961. That is 600 meters, so he had to put it right at the start of the runway

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1961/1961%20-%201722.html

Looking at the pictures it looks like some cones were put to show how close spectators were allowed to go, and they were sitting beyond those.

/Lars

[Edited 2012-10-18 10:53:47]

306, 319, 320, 321, 332, 34A, AN2, AT4, AT5, AT7, 733, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 146, AR1, B22, CN1, CR2, DH1, DH3, DH4

NoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7796 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (7 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 9743 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 5):
the distance from the landing threshold to the end of the runway is 610 meters.

Plenty for the C-160 even if fully loaded.

I support the right to arm bears

flyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 1268 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 9658 times:

Quoting Larshjort (Reply 6):
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1961/1961%20-%201722.html

That PDF file also shows a Piaggio PD.808 business jet. Now that's an aircraft I want to cuddle.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Richard Vandervord

David

Even a letdown, if it is thoroughly and final, is a step forward.

L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29350 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (7 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 9652 times:

Flyingturtle: that is why lears and t-37's shouldnt have sex

OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.

rheinwaldner From Switzerland, joined Jan 2008, 2061 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (7 months 18 hours ago) and read 9142 times:

At least the Transall left some stunning rubber marks on that road!

GPHOTO From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 817 posts, RR: 27
Reply 11, posted (7 months 1 hour ago) and read 8921 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

That's why you should never stand under the flightpath close to the end of the runway. You never know when something like this could happen. Even on a good approach, a sudden gust of wind from behind could unexpectedly increase the descent rate in the final seconds.

I bet there were a few 'gusts of wind' all around when this happened.......

Glad no-one was injured.

Best regards,

Jim

Erm, is this thing on?

flyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 1268 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (6 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 8840 times:

Quoting GPHOTO (Reply 11):
That's why you should never stand under the flightpath close to the end of the runway.

What should the car drivers do?

The runway effectively ends at the rural road.

David

Even a letdown, if it is thoroughly and final, is a step forward.

btblue From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 531 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (4 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6564 times:

Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I just saw this come up on the Daily Mail website...

DM Spotting Article

DH 89 146/2/3 737/2/3/4/5/7/8/9 A320 1/2/18/19/21 DC9/40/50 DC10/30 A300/6 A330/2/3 A340/3/6 757/2/3 747/4 767/3/4 F50/7

HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31201 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (4 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 6174 times:

A few feet earlier and the result would have been different....

Think of the brighter side!

soon7x7 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 2796 posts, RR: 14
Reply 15, posted (4 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5207 times:

Possibly a bit of hubris there along with the distraction of photogs holding for the $$ shot....Hope this flight crew flies a amphibian if future plans include Maho Beach.

ptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3766 posts, RR: 20
Reply 16, posted (4 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5153 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
What should the car drivers do?

Passing road traffic would have been unlucky, but that doesn't make Jim's advice not to stay under the flightpath less sensible.

Peter

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)

PHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 4946 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (4 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3594 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 14):
A few feet earlier and the result would have been different....

Precisely. If that thing landed in anything but asphalt we'd be talking about casualties.

頑張ろう日本!

dandaire From UK - Wales, joined Jul 2008, 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (4 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2599 times:

Reminds me of this video of a Vanguard Merchantman making its final landing at Brooklands in 1996.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmakSwlYLs0

Wow!

Old age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Decommissioned German C-160 Near Catastrophe!

Username:	No username? Sign up now!
Password:	Forgot Password? Be reminded. Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)

Military aviation related posts only!
Not military related? Use the other forums
No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
No hostile language or criticizing of others.
Do not post copyright protected material.
Use relevant and describing topics.
Check if your post already been discussed.
Check your spelling!
DETAILED RULES

Check Spelling

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics: